aniket16c
@GMATNinja@abhimahna@
e-GMAT:
I have question regarding the use of as ... as comparison.
In general while approaching a comparison question ( I do not know if I have used the correct term - I mean the questions comparing ideas using
not only .. but also, either .. or , nor etc.), my general approach is to check the meaning of ideas being compared and then check the sentence structure.
For instance, in this example, I checked
"disturbing to his own time" &
"it is compelling for ours". I observed that first phrase is an adjectival phrase and second is a clause with a subject (it --> to be corrected to they =style and choice) + verb (is). So there is a parallelism error.
Now in the OA, if I apply the same logic, it seems to suggest that there is something wrong with parallelism.
So can I rectify the above logic as: If there is a tense ambiguity then the parallelism must denote proper timeline, hence the structure must be:
1. X + "tense indicator" + as/not only/etc. + "comparing phrase" + as/not only/etc. + Y + "tense indicator" + "comparing phrase".
2. X + "tense indicator"+ as fast/likely/equal etc as+ Y + "tense indicator" + "comparing phrase"
And extending the previous logic, I need to ensure parallelism between the two "comparing phrases".
I would like to know if there is anything wrong in my basic understanding of parallelism and if I my logic is correct?
First, it's important to differentiate between parallel markers such as "both/and," or "either/or," and comparison markers, such as "as" or "like." When you see "both," for instance, the structure of the parallel components will usually be close to identical: "Lebron James, for all of his many impressive accomplishments, has disappointed fans both
in Cleveland and
in Los Angeles. In each case, we have "preposition + noun," so grammatically speaking, they're the same.
But when we use "as," which is a comparison marker, we have a little more flexibility, in terms of the placement of the items we're comparing. For example:
"Tim ate as many hot dogs yesterday as Dave will tomorrow."
This sentence is perfectly fine - we're comparing how many hot dogs Tim ate yesterday and how many hot dogs Dave will eat tomorrow. We wouldn't read it and worry about the fact that the noun phrase "many hot dogs" follows the first "as" and the full clause "Dave did" follows the second. Moreover, there are structural clues indicating that the actions take place at different times, so it's appropriate that the verb tenses vary.
Put another way, rather than breaking the items into parts of speech and rigidly applying rules, we want to think about the
logic of the construction.
In the OA, we're comparing two elements: 1) how compelling Eakins' style and choices were in his time to 2) how compelling they are in ours. The meaning makes sense, and there are no grammatical mistakes. That's what we care about most.
I hope that helps!