Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2107:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
09 Sep 2026, 19:00
Kudos
Bookmarks
N
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
(N/A)
Question Stats:
100% (01:24) correct
0%
(00:00)
wrong
based on 34
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Time and time again it has been shown that students who attend colleges with low faculty/student ratios get the most well-rounded education. As a result, when my children are ready to attend college, I'll be sure they attend a school with a very small student population.
Which of the following, if true, identifies the greatest flaw in the reasoning above?
A. A low faculty/student ratio is the effect of a well-rounded education, not its source.
B. Intelligence should be considered the result of childhood environment, not advanced education.
C. A very small student population does not by itself, ensure a low faculty/student ratio.
D. Parental desires and preferences rarely determines a child's choice of a college or university.
E. Students must take advantage of the low faculty/student ratio by intentionally choosing small classes.
The OA will be automatically revealed on Thursday 10th of September 2026 07:00:29 PM Pacific Time Zone
Which of the following, if true, identifies the greatest flaw in the reasoning above?
A. A low faculty/student ratio is the effect of a well-rounded education, not its source.
B. Intelligence should be considered the result of childhood environment, not advanced education.
C. A very small student population does not by itself, ensure a low faculty/student ratio.
D. Parental desires and preferences rarely determines a child's choice of a college or university.
E. Students must take advantage of the low faculty/student ratio by intentionally choosing small classes.
The OA will be automatically revealed on Thursday 10th of September 2026 07:00:29 PM Pacific Time Zone
09 Sep 2026, 19:34
Kudos
Bookmarks
low faculty student ratio -> most wellrounded education.
but small student population doesnt always mean low faculty student ratio.
So, C must be the answer.
but small student population doesnt always mean low faculty student ratio.
So, C must be the answer.
09 Sep 2026, 23:12
Kudos
Bookmarks
history= colleges with low faculty-children ratio, children get well rounded education.
author- when my kid is ready to go to college, make sure they attend college with very small student population.
premise is about having low ration of faculty-student to get well rounded education but conclusion is about choosing colleges with small num of children. author must be assuming that small num of children means low ratio of faculty-students.
A this is says the effect is reversed and not whats mentioned in passage. but thats not author is looking at ton make conclusion. out.
B this is completely irrelevant here.
C yes, if small student popultion doesnt get to the low faculty-student ratio then having goal of receiving well rounded edu wont be there. so this attacks the assumption here.
D not concerned with whose desire its to select college. out.
E if that case then you dont necessarily need college with low students but rather classes that has low faculty-student ratio. this goes in different direction.
ans C
author- when my kid is ready to go to college, make sure they attend college with very small student population.
premise is about having low ration of faculty-student to get well rounded education but conclusion is about choosing colleges with small num of children. author must be assuming that small num of children means low ratio of faculty-students.
A this is says the effect is reversed and not whats mentioned in passage. but thats not author is looking at ton make conclusion. out.
B this is completely irrelevant here.
C yes, if small student popultion doesnt get to the low faculty-student ratio then having goal of receiving well rounded edu wont be there. so this attacks the assumption here.
D not concerned with whose desire its to select college. out.
E if that case then you dont necessarily need college with low students but rather classes that has low faculty-student ratio. this goes in different direction.
ans C
Bunuel
