Nez
In no other industry would firms resort to such an idiosyncratic idea as that it is good to milk their best suppliers dry as would western retail-food sector do.
as that it is good to milk their best suppliers dry as would western retail-food sector do.
such as that it is good to milk their best suppliers dry as would retail-food sector in the west.
as that it is good to milk their best suppliers dry as retail-food sector in the west does.
such as that it is good to milk their best suppliers dry as retail-food sector of the west.
such as that it is good to milk their best suppliers dry as in retail-food sector of the west.
How is that sentence correct? the OA. Help.
First consider the following sentence:
In no other industry would firms resort to such an idiosyncratic idea
as (firms) in retail-food sector of the west (would resort to).
The green font portion is compared to blue font portion using
such..... as.
The parallelism marker is :
such.... asThe parallel elements are:
1.
Firms in no other industry would resort to (words rearranged for easy understanding).
2.
(firms) in retail-food sector of the west (would resort to)Omitting the repeated words in the second part of the comparison, the sentence becomes:
In no other industry would firms resort to such an idiosyncratic idea as in retail-food sector of the west.
Now introduce an example of an idiosyncratic idea using
such as (the example is in orange font):
In no other industry would firms resort to such an idiosyncratic idea
such as that it is good to milk their best suppliers dry as in retail-food sector of the west.
There are 2
such as constructions in the sentence:
1. such.... as.. is used to compare activities in 2 industries.
2. such as is used to introduce an example of an idiosyncratic idea.
Is the above explanation clear?
Big NO.
There is no two "such as" in the OA.
The OA is wrong grammatically.
That's very annoying.