Last visit was: 19 Nov 2025, 21:05 It is currently 19 Nov 2025, 21:05
Home
GMAT
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Rewards
Chat
My Profile
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
805+ Level|   Word Problems|      
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 19 Nov 2025
Posts: 105,390
Own Kudos:
778,390
 [5]
Given Kudos: 99,977
Products:
GMAT Club Tests Forum Quiz
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 105,390
Kudos: 778,390
 [5]
A state legislator drafts an income tax proposal that imposes a tax of 16 Nov 2023, 02:30
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
B
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

95% (hard)

Question Stats:

17% (02:45) correct 83% (02:24) wrong based on 58 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
A state legislator drafts an income tax proposal that imposes a tax of 20% on the first $100,000 of an individual’s income, increases the tax to 25% on the next $50,000 in income, and increases the tax by an additional 5% on each additional $50,000 in income, to a maximum tax of 40% on the portion of income over $250,000. Under the proposal, would the state collect an average (arithmetic mean) of more than 30% of the income of the residents of County X ?

(1) The median income for a resident of County X is $65,000.
(2) No resident of County X earns an income of more than $350,000.


ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
B
User avatar
cdrectenwald
User avatar
Joined: 05 May 2018
Last visit: 10 Nov 2025
Posts: 102
Own Kudos:
145
Given Kudos: 54
Posts: 102
Kudos: 145
A state legislator drafts an income tax proposal that imposes a tax of 16 Nov 2023, 04:51
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Imo E because none of the statements really say anything about the distribution of incomes

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
Shivanibh25
User avatar
Joined: 13 May 2023
Last visit: 12 Aug 2025
Posts: 18
Own Kudos:
3
Given Kudos: 21
Location: India
Posts: 18
Kudos: 3
A state legislator drafts an income tax proposal that imposes a tax of 17 Nov 2023, 02:56
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
A state legislator drafts an income tax proposal that imposes a tax of 20% on the first $100,000 of an individual’s income, increases the tax to 25% on the next $50,000 in income, and increases the tax by an additional 5% on each additional $50,000 in income, to a maximum tax of 40% on the portion of income over $250,000. Under the proposal, would the state collect an average (arithmetic mean) of more than 30% of the income of the residents of County X ?

(1) The median income for a resident of County X is $65,000.
(2) No resident of County X earns an income of more than $350,000.


Show more


Why is it B and not E?
User avatar
SudsMeister
User avatar
Joined: 04 Sep 2019
Last visit: 01 Nov 2025
Posts: 87
Own Kudos:
31
 [1]
Given Kudos: 97
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Sustainability
Schools: LBS '22 (D) Instead Sept 20 Intake CBS '22 (D) Booth '22 (D)
GMAT Focus 1: 705 Q89 V85 DI81
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V42
WE:Education (Non-Profit and Government)
Schools: LBS '22 (D) Instead Sept 20 Intake CBS '22 (D) Booth '22 (D)
GMAT Focus 1: 705 Q89 V85 DI81
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V42
Posts: 87
Kudos: 31
 [1]
A state legislator drafts an income tax proposal that imposes a tax of 01 Apr 2025, 10:06
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:

A state legislator drafts an income tax proposal that imposes a tax of 20% on the first $100,000 of an individual’s income, increases the tax to 25% on the next $50,000 in income, and increases the tax by an additional 5% on each additional $50,000 in income, to a maximum tax of 40% on the portion of income over $250,000. Under the proposal, would the state collect an average (arithmetic mean) of more than 30% of the income of the residents of County X ?

(1) The median income for a resident of County X is $65,000.
(2) No resident of County X earns an income of more than $350,000.
Show more
1st 100k tax is 20% = 20k tax
Next 50k is 25% = 12.5k tax
Next 50k is 30% = 15k tax
Next 50k is 35% = 17.5k tax
Anything above 250k is 40% tax.
A point to note is that total tax as a % of total income for any resident will be equal to or more than 20% and less than 40%.
20% ≤ tax rate < 40%. It can never go above 40% as some component of the income is taxed at 20-35%, so even if a person earns 100 billion, the tax rate will be some 39.9999999997% but never touch 40% due to weighted average of total tax.

1) Says that median income is 65k. So 1/2 of the residents will earn 65k, remaining can earn anything above 65k. Let's try 2 cases.
Case 1: Income of 3 residents = 65k, 65k, 65k
Tax for each is 13k, 13k, 13k
Taxes collected as a % of total income of the country = 13k x 3 / 65k x 3 = 20%.

Case 2: Income of 3 residents = 65k, 65k, 1000k.

Total tax = 13k + 13k + (20k + 12.5k + 15k + 17.5k + 750k*40%) = 26k + (65k + 300K) = 391k
Total income = 1130k
Taxes as a % of total income = 391k / 1130k = 34.6%

Taxes are 20% in case 1 and 34.6% in case 2, so can be above as well as below 30%

(1) is INSUFFICIENT

2) No one earns more than 350k.
Let's say country has 10 residents and all earn 350k, total income = 3500k, total tax = 10*(65k + 100k*40%) = 10*(105k) = 1050k
Tax as a % of total income = 105/350 = 30%
Let's say all 10 residents earn 340k, total income = 3400k, total tax = 10*(65k + 90k*40%) = 10*(101k) = 1010k
Tax as a % of total income = 101/340 = 29.7%

The more we lower the income, the portion of income that is taxed at 40% will also become lower, so overall tax rate will also reduce.
To make it clearer, lowest tax rate is 20% and highest is 40%. If the income has a bigger portion of the income that is taxed at 40% (i.e. above 250k) then the overall rate will tend to be closer to 40% but will never reach 40%.
And if the income has a bigger portion of the income that is taxed at lesser rates, then overall rate will reduce more and move toward 20%.

In our case, at 350k income, tax rate is 30%. But everyone's income is lower than 350k, so the overall rate for any income lower than 350k will always be lower than 30% (as more taxes are paid at lower rates than at 40% rates).

Maximum possible income for all residents can be <350k, so maximum possible tax rate for all residents <30%.
As overall tax rate is always lower than 30%, we have an answer.

(2) is SUFFICIENT

Answer: B
Moderators:
Bunuel
Math Expert
105390 posts
kingbucky
496 posts