GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

 It is currently 17 Feb 2019, 21:14

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Events & Promotions

Events & Promotions in February
PrevNext
SuMoTuWeThFrSa
272829303112
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
242526272812
Open Detailed Calendar
• Free GMAT Algebra Webinar

February 17, 2019

February 17, 2019

07:00 AM PST

09:00 AM PST

Attend this Free Algebra Webinar and learn how to master Inequalities and Absolute Value problems on GMAT.
• Valentine's day SALE is on! 25% off.

February 18, 2019

February 18, 2019

10:00 PM PST

11:00 PM PST

We don’t care what your relationship status this year - we love you just the way you are. AND we want you to crush the GMAT!

In 1719 the Meissen manufacturers found a way of combining kaolin

Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Manager
Joined: 31 Oct 2011
Posts: 229
In 1719 the Meissen manufacturers found a way of combining kaolin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

Updated on: 20 Nov 2018, 06:34
1
18
00:00

Difficulty:

45% (medium)

Question Stats:

61% (01:20) correct 39% (01:27) wrong based on 730 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

In 1719 the Meissen manufacturers found a way of combining kaolin, quartz, and feldspar, a kind of potash, to manufacture a hard-paste porcelain, which was comparable to what was being imported by Europeans from the Far East for centuries.

(A) which was comparable to what was being imported by Europeans from the Far East for centuries

(B) which compared with that which Europeans imported from the Far East for centuries

(C) comparable to what Europeans has imported for centuries

(D) comparable to what Europeans had imported for centuries

(E) that could be compared to what Europeans imported for centuries

Meissen has claimed to be the birthplace of European porcelain since Johann Friedrich Bottger, a former pharmacist's apprentice and sometime alchemist whose 300th birthday Meissen celebrates this year, found a way in 1719 to combine kaolin, quartz and feldspar, a kind of potash, to manufacture hard-paste porcelain comparable to what Europeans had imported for centuries from the Far East.

Originally posted by eybrj2 on 11 Feb 2012, 23:01.
Last edited by hazelnut on 20 Nov 2018, 06:34, edited 5 times in total.
Formatted the question, edited the question
Senior Manager
Status: Prep started for the n-th time
Joined: 29 Aug 2010
Posts: 474
Re: In 1719 the Meissen manufacturers found a way of combining kaolin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Feb 2012, 18:23
2
3
+1 for D.

C uses the wrong tense(has imported). We are talking about 1719 here. (distant past). We need a past perfect to establish that import happened before the 1719 - invention.

Crick
General Discussion
Manager
Joined: 19 Apr 2011
Posts: 188
Schools: Booth,NUS,St.Gallon
Re: In 1719 the Meissen manufacturers found a way of combining kaolin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Feb 2012, 12:46
2
+1 for D. Correctly uses the past perfect tense .Which is unnecessary and can be avoided .
_________________

+1 if you like my explanation .Thanks

Retired Moderator
Status: Flying over the cloud!
Joined: 16 Aug 2011
Posts: 566
Location: Viet Nam
GMAT Date: 06-06-2014
GPA: 3.07
Re: In 1719 the Meissen manufacturers found a way of combining kaolin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Feb 2012, 22:38
The tense in choice C is wrong. The tense of non-underlined part of the sentence is past simple. Read carefully, you will realize the achievement of the Europeans was gained before that past action. So, the correct tense is past perfect.

The correct answer is choice D.
_________________
Manager
Joined: 17 Sep 2011
Posts: 137
Re: In 1719 the Meissen manufacturers found a way of combining kaolin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Feb 2012, 23:29
C uses wrong tense. D is the correct as it uses correct tense.
_________________

_________________
Giving +1 kudos is a better way of saying 'Thank You'.

Intern
Joined: 25 Aug 2011
Posts: 20
Concentration: Entrepreneurship, General Management
GMAT Date: 01-31-2012
Re: In 1719 the Meissen manufacturers found a way of combining kaolin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Apr 2012, 08:16
Hi, why A is incorrect? It sounds more logical to me....on the contrary in answer D seems that we are comparing the WAY found by manufactures, instead of comparing the hard-paste porcelain.
Thanks
Intern
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Posts: 10
Concentration: General Management, Operations
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GRE 1: Q770 V680
WE: Investment Banking (Investment Banking)
Re: In 1719 the Meissen manufacturers found a way of combining kaolin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Apr 2012, 09:52
D doesn't talk about 'the Far East' at all.

IMO, the answer should be A.
Manager
Joined: 19 Mar 2012
Posts: 152
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance, General Management
GMAT 1: 750 Q50 V42
GPA: 3.69
WE: Analyst (Mutual Funds and Brokerage)
Re: In 1719 the Meissen manufacturers found a way of combining kaolin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

08 Apr 2012, 10:09
Saurajm wrote:
Hi, why A is incorrect? It sounds more logical to me....on the contrary in answer D seems that we are comparing the WAY found by manufactures, instead of comparing the hard-paste porcelain.
Thanks

(A) uses the wrong tense choice I think "what was being"

(D) actually, porcelain is being compared to the imports. looking at the sentence structure, "comparable to . . ." modifies porcelain (it immediately follows porcelain)
Intern
Joined: 03 Jan 2017
Posts: 14
Re: In 1719 the Meissen manufacturers found a way of combining kaolin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Sep 2017, 08:28
saikarthikreddy wrote:
+1 for D. Correctly uses the past perfect tense .Which is unnecessary and can be avoided .

yes..use of had is not obligatory.
Retired Moderator
Status: worked for Kaplan's associates, but now on my own, free and flying
Joined: 19 Feb 2007
Posts: 4684
Location: India
WE: Education (Education)
Re: In 1719 the Meissen manufacturers found a way of combining kaolin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

17 Sep 2017, 23:53
2
Top Contributor
Quote:
In 1719 the Meissen manufacturers found a way of combining kaolin, quartz, and feldspar, a kind of potash, to manufacture a hard-paste porcelain, which was comparable to what was being imported by Europeans form the Far East for centuries.

(A) which was comparable to what was being imported by Europeans form the Far East for centuries

(B) which compared with that which Europeans imported from the Far East for centuries

(C) comparable to what Europeans has imported for centuries

(D) comparable to what Europeans had imported for centuries

(E) that could be compared to what Europeans imported for centuries

Is the transcription just correct here? Why is the info about from the Far East missing in option C, D, and E?
_________________

GMAT coaching under able guidance is only half expensive and time-consuming as a self-study in the final reckoning

Intern
Joined: 03 Jan 2017
Posts: 14
Re: In 1719 the Meissen manufacturers found a way of combining kaolin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

18 Sep 2017, 10:19
daagh wrote:
Quote:
In 1719 the Meissen manufacturers found a way of combining kaolin, quartz, and feldspar, a kind of potash, to manufacture a hard-paste porcelain, which was comparable to what was being imported by Europeans form the Far East for centuries.

(A) which was comparable to what was being imported by Europeans form the Far East for centuries

(B) which compared with that which Europeans imported from the Far East for centuries

(C) comparable to what Europeans has imported for centuries

(D) comparable to what Europeans had imported for centuries

(E) that could be compared to what Europeans imported for centuries

Is the transcription just correct here? Why is the info about from the Far East missing in option C, D, and E?

I guess this is acceptable, As the sentence meaning doesn't change.
Manager
Joined: 29 Feb 2016
Posts: 112
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V35
GPA: 3
Re: In 1719 the Meissen manufacturers found a way of combining kaolin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

20 Sep 2017, 01:52
2
daagh wrote:
Quote:
In 1719 the Meissen manufacturers found a way of combining kaolin, quartz, and feldspar, a kind of potash, to manufacture a hard-paste porcelain, which was comparable to what was being imported by Europeans form the Far East for centuries.

(A) which was comparable to what was being imported by Europeans form the Far East for centuries

(B) which compared with that which Europeans imported from the Far East for centuries

(C) comparable to what Europeans has imported for centuries

(D) comparable to what Europeans had imported for centuries

(E) that could be compared to what Europeans imported for centuries

Is the transcription just correct here? Why is the info about from the Far East missing in option C, D, and E?

Also what is the related event for had imported ??
_________________

Find what you love and let it kill you. — Charles Bukowski

Intern
Joined: 03 Jan 2017
Posts: 14
Re: In 1719 the Meissen manufacturers found a way of combining kaolin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

11 Dec 2017, 15:13
(A) which was comparable to what was being imported by Europeans form the Far East for centuries

(B) which compared with that which Europeans imported from the Far East for centuries fragment

(C) comparable to what Europeans has imported for centuries

(D) comparable to what Europeans had imported for centuries

(E) that could be compared to what Europeans imported for centuries
Senior Manager
Joined: 17 Mar 2014
Posts: 438
Re: In 1719 the Meissen manufacturers found a way of combining kaolin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

09 Aug 2018, 11:03
eybrj2 wrote:
In 1719 the Meissen manufacturers found a way of combining kaolin, quartz, and feldspar, a kind of potash, to manufacture a hard-paste porcelain, which was comparable to what was being imported by Europeans form the Far East for centuries.

(A) which was comparable to what was being imported by Europeans form the Far East for centuries

(B) which compared with that which Europeans imported from the Far East for centuries

(C) comparable to what Europeans has imported for centuries

(D) comparable to what Europeans had imported for centuries

(E) that could be compared to what Europeans imported for centuries

This question has to be reworded. Following is excerpt from NYT.

Meissen has claimed to be the birthplace of European porcelain since Johann Friedrich Bottger, a former pharmacist's apprentice and sometime alchemist whose 300th birthday Meissen celebrates this year, found a way in 1719 to combine kaolin, quartz and feldspar, a kind of potash, to manufacture hard-paste porcelain comparable to what Europeans had imported for centuries from the Far East. Moved to Deserted Castle

https://www.nytimes.com/1982/07/10/busi ... elain.html

is comma (,) required after porcelain ?
Director
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 512
Re: In 1719 the Meissen manufacturers found a way of combining kaolin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Aug 2018, 00:32
eybrj2 wrote:
In 1719 the Meissen manufacturers found a way of combining kaolin, quartz, and feldspar, a kind of potash, to manufacture a hard-paste porcelain, which was comparable to what was being imported by Europeans form the Far East for centuries.

(A) which was comparable to what was being imported by Europeans form the Far East for centuries

(B) which compared with that which Europeans imported from the Far East for centuries

(C) comparable to what Europeans has imported for centuries

(D) comparable to what Europeans had imported for centuries

(E) that could be compared to what Europeans imported for centuries

the importing happens before the manufacturing so, had done is used not simple past.
"for centuries" can be finished or unfinished time words, which show a period in the past or a period from the past point of time to present, depending on context. in this context "for centuries" is finished time words which show a period which finished before manufacturing. but "for centuries" can be unfinised time period and simple past, not past perfect is used.

this point is hard, because in some case, "for centuries show a unfinished period.

when I met her last year, she said she learned gmat for many months.

in this case, "leaned" not "had learned " is correct because at the time of speaking, leaning still go on.

am i correct, ? pls, comment, i am not expert on gmat sc.
Director
Joined: 29 Jun 2017
Posts: 512
Re: In 1719 the Meissen manufacturers found a way of combining kaolin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Aug 2018, 03:24
1
I learn gmat until last month
is correct. and in this case, simple past, not past perfect is used.

what I want to say is that "for " is used in past context can signal a simple past or past ferfect, depending on meaning

and the only case, in which past perfect is used is that it show an action happening before a past action. we know the sequence by understanding the context
Intern
Joined: 16 Jan 2016
Posts: 2
Re: In 1719 the Meissen manufacturers found a way of combining kaolin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

12 Aug 2018, 03:53
In 1719 the Meissen manufacturers found a way of combining kaolin, quartz, and feldspar, a kind of potash, to manufacture a hard-paste porcelain, which was comparable to what was being imported by Europeans form the Far East for centuries.

(A) which was comparable to what was being imported by Europeans form the Far East for centuries

(B) which compared with that which Europeans imported from the Far East for centuries

(C) comparable to what Europeans has imported for centuries

(D) comparable to what Europeans had imported for centuries

(E) that could be compared to what Europeans imported for centuries

There are 2 things in past. So the past perfect is used
Senior Manager
Joined: 26 Jun 2017
Posts: 415
Location: Russian Federation
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
WE: Information Technology (Other)
Re: In 1719 the Meissen manufacturers found a way of combining kaolin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

13 Sep 2018, 15:25
eybrj2 wrote:
In 1719 the Meissen manufacturers found a way of combining kaolin, quartz, and feldspar, a kind of potash, to manufacture a hard-paste porcelain, which was comparable to what was being imported by Europeans form the Far East for centuries.

(A) which was comparable to what was being imported by Europeans form the Far East for centuries

(B) which compared with that which Europeans imported from the Far East for centuries

(C) comparable to what Europeans has imported for centuries

(D) comparable to what Europeans had imported for centuries

(E) that could be compared to what Europeans imported for centuries

First time I mention it.
"Which was comparable" sounds not right. Or redundant or something that does not make sense.
"comparable"on the other hand isan attribute of porcelain, so it is good.
A, B are out.
C has SV agreement error. Europeans - plural, has - singular.
"couldbe compared" - same as "which". Out.

D.
Director
Joined: 20 Sep 2016
Posts: 589
Re: In 1719 the Meissen manufacturers found a way of combining kaolin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Oct 2018, 07:35
daagh , could you please tell me whether the usage of " had imprted " is right here. I chose D by POE. but I'm not sure about the past perfect
Senior Manager
Joined: 08 Aug 2017
Posts: 325
Re: In 1719 the Meissen manufacturers found a way of combining kaolin  [#permalink]

Show Tags

28 Oct 2018, 21:32
Is underline portion cover ", comparable " or not? If yes, D is correct, otherwise, D is wrong.

Where am I wrong?
Re: In 1719 the Meissen manufacturers found a way of combining kaolin   [#permalink] 28 Oct 2018, 21:32

Go to page    1   2    Next  [ 25 posts ]

Display posts from previous: Sort by