Last visit was: 20 Apr 2026, 21:09 It is currently 20 Apr 2026, 21:09
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
MNmba
avatar
Joined: 17 Nov 2012
Last visit: 12 Feb 2013
Posts: 5
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Given Kudos: 3
Schools: Stanford '15 (D) Kellogg 1YR '14 (WL) Booth '15 (A$)
Schools: Stanford '15 (D) Kellogg 1YR '14 (WL) Booth '15 (A$)
Posts: 5
Kudos: 1
 [1]
Stanford GSB 2013 - Calling all Applicants 20 Nov 2012, 08:31
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
xnormjeanx
siris
The official driving variable for the order of the invites is the order of the files being read (if you want another confirmation look at yesterday's post on their admissions blog). Therefore you have two cases :
- Your file has been read and you don't have an invitation : 0 % (+ waitlist odds)
- Your file has not been read and you don't have an invitation (obviously) : 14 % (+ waitlist odds)

Its as simple as that.

Sure, but the two cases have different probabilities. Before any applications have been reviewed, there's a 100% chance of being in the second scenario, thus 14% chance. After all applications have been reviewed, there's a 100% chance of being in the first scenario, thus a 0% chance.

As we get later in the cycle and more applications have been reviewed, the likelihood of being in the first scenario outweighs the likelihood of being in the second scenario. So the odds kmcduw put out there are actually right.
Show more

The probability function is actually very simple: It is the probability that your application has not yet been reviewed times the probability of any given application getting an invite (14%). So that the start you have 100% x 14% = 14%. At the end you have 0% x 14% = 0%. If you think half have been looked at and you haven't heard you have 50% x 14% = 7%. And so on.

I know you guys are all implying this, but thought I would just spell it out for anyone who was interested.
avatar
anonymous2012
avatar
Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Last visit: 29 Mar 2013
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
29
 [3]
Given Kudos: 9
Location: United States
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, Strategy
Schools: Kellogg '15 (WL) Duke '15 (I) Stanford '15 (D) HBS '15 (M) Ross '15 (A)
Schools: Kellogg '15 (WL) Duke '15 (I) Stanford '15 (D) HBS '15 (M) Ross '15 (A)
Posts: 44
Kudos: 29
 [3]
Stanford GSB 2013 - Calling all Applicants 20 Nov 2012, 08:52
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
How about this: if you are going to get an invite, there is a 100% chance Stanford will tell you about it between now and December 12th.

14%/7%/1%/0%, it's all irrelevant.
avatar
GPT55
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 04 Mar 2011
Last visit: 24 Jun 2013
Posts: 127
Own Kudos:
41
 [1]
Given Kudos: 38
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Haas '15 (M) Yale '15 (A) Stanford '15 (D) Booth '15 (D) Stern '15 (A$)
GMAT 1: 700 Q44 V41
GMAT 2: 720 Q47 V41
WE:Law (Non-Profit and Government)
Schools: Haas '15 (M) Yale '15 (A) Stanford '15 (D) Booth '15 (D) Stern '15 (A$)
GMAT 2: 720 Q47 V41
Posts: 127
Kudos: 41
 [1]
Stanford GSB 2013 - Calling all Applicants 20 Nov 2012, 10:41
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
anonymous2012
How about this: if you are going to get an invite, there is a 100% chance Stanford will tell you about it between now and December 12th.

14%/7%/1%/0%, it's all irrelevant.
Show more

It's the aftermath of GMAT I guess. ;)
avatar
kmcduw
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2012
Last visit: 11 Aug 2017
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
19
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance
Schools: Haas '14 (D) Tuck '14 (D) Stern '14 (D) HBS '14 (D) Wharton '15 (D) Stanford '15 (D) CBS '15 (D) Sloan '15 (D) Anderson '19 (A$) Foster '19 (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q48 V45
GPA: 3.71
WE:Accounting (Aerospace and Defense)
Schools: Haas '14 (D) Tuck '14 (D) Stern '14 (D) HBS '14 (D) Wharton '15 (D) Stanford '15 (D) CBS '15 (D) Sloan '15 (D) Anderson '19 (A$) Foster '19 (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q48 V45
Posts: 41
Kudos: 19
Stanford GSB 2013 - Calling all Applicants 20 Nov 2012, 11:52
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
siris
The official driving variable for the order of the invites is the order of the files being read (if you want another confirmation look at yesterday's post on their admissions blog). Therefore you have two cases :
- Your file has been read and you don't have an invitation : 0 % (+ waitlist odds)
- Your file has not been read and you don't have an invitation (obviously) : 14 % (+ waitlist odds)

Its as simple as that.
Show more

Ok, I'll agree that that is the driving variable, but it's also an obvious one. I wouldn't consider a variable relevant in predicting my fate unless I know its value. I have no idea when the admissions committee read, or will read my application. I do know when I submitted it, where I live, what my major was, what my intended concentration was, what my GMAT score was, etc. Because I have to assume that the time my application is read is random, and that applications are read linearly throughout the review period, I stand by my calculation. Here it is in an easier format to understand that incorporates the above:

The probability at this point of your application having been read is 75% because we are 75% of the way through the review period. If your application was read, you were either invited to interview (100% chance), or not invited to interview (0% chance--we'll ignore waitlists). So this already-determined out come accounts for 75% of us. If we did not receive an invite, our only hope is to be in the remaining 25%.

We know that because a random variable (when your application is read) is the only driver of your odds, they remain at 14% even if your application has not been read. Therefore, your odds if you have not already been invited are 14% x 25% = 3.5%, which is similar to the 4% I provided earlier. I have some ideas of what the reconciling half percent is, but I'm not willing to spend the time to prove it out.
avatar
kmcduw
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2012
Last visit: 11 Aug 2017
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
19
 [1]
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance
Schools: Haas '14 (D) Tuck '14 (D) Stern '14 (D) HBS '14 (D) Wharton '15 (D) Stanford '15 (D) CBS '15 (D) Sloan '15 (D) Anderson '19 (A$) Foster '19 (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q48 V45
GPA: 3.71
WE:Accounting (Aerospace and Defense)
Schools: Haas '14 (D) Tuck '14 (D) Stern '14 (D) HBS '14 (D) Wharton '15 (D) Stanford '15 (D) CBS '15 (D) Sloan '15 (D) Anderson '19 (A$) Foster '19 (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q48 V45
Posts: 41
Kudos: 19
 [1]
Stanford GSB 2013 - Calling all Applicants 20 Nov 2012, 11:54
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
anonymous2012
How about this: if you are going to get an invite, there is a 100% chance Stanford will tell you about it between now and December 12th.

14%/7%/1%/0%, it's all irrelevant.
Show more


It is relevant. As my expectation of going to business school rises, my propensity to do certain things around home such as purchase new furniture that would be difficult to move or renew college football season tickets declines.
avatar
anonymous2012
avatar
Joined: 23 Feb 2012
Last visit: 29 Mar 2013
Posts: 44
Own Kudos:
29
 [2]
Given Kudos: 9
Location: United States
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, Strategy
Schools: Kellogg '15 (WL) Duke '15 (I) Stanford '15 (D) HBS '15 (M) Ross '15 (A)
Schools: Kellogg '15 (WL) Duke '15 (I) Stanford '15 (D) HBS '15 (M) Ross '15 (A)
Posts: 44
Kudos: 29
 [2]
Stanford GSB 2013 - Calling all Applicants 20 Nov 2012, 14:15
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kmcduw
anonymous2012
How about this: if you are going to get an invite, there is a 100% chance Stanford will tell you about it between now and December 12th.

14%/7%/1%/0%, it's all irrelevant.


It is relevant. As my expectation of going to business school rises, my propensity to do certain things around home such as purchase new furniture that would be difficult to move or renew college football season tickets declines.
Show more


You are right. I can see how knowing the difference between a 3% chance of an invite that carries under a 50% admittance chance or a 7% chance of an interview that carries under a 50% admittance chance is very relevant in the decision to buy furniture and football tickets in the next three weeks.
avatar
kmcduw
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2012
Last visit: 11 Aug 2017
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
19
 [1]
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance
Schools: Haas '14 (D) Tuck '14 (D) Stern '14 (D) HBS '14 (D) Wharton '15 (D) Stanford '15 (D) CBS '15 (D) Sloan '15 (D) Anderson '19 (A$) Foster '19 (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q48 V45
GPA: 3.71
WE:Accounting (Aerospace and Defense)
Schools: Haas '14 (D) Tuck '14 (D) Stern '14 (D) HBS '14 (D) Wharton '15 (D) Stanford '15 (D) CBS '15 (D) Sloan '15 (D) Anderson '19 (A$) Foster '19 (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q48 V45
Posts: 41
Kudos: 19
 [1]
Stanford GSB 2013 - Calling all Applicants 20 Nov 2012, 16:06
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
anonymous2012
kmcduw
anonymous2012
How about this: if you are going to get an invite, there is a 100% chance Stanford will tell you about it between now and December 12th.

14%/7%/1%/0%, it's all irrelevant.


It is relevant. As my expectation of going to business school rises, my propensity to do certain things around home such as purchase new furniture that would be difficult to move or renew college football season tickets declines.


You are right. I can see how knowing the difference between a 3% chance of an invite that carries under a 50% admittance chance or a 7% chance of an interview that carries under a 50% admittance chance is very relevant in the decision to buy furniture and football tickets in the next three weeks.
Show more


Initial expectation of an interview is 14%, not 7%.

Yes, my personal anecdote re: a decision on whether to renew my season tickets by last Friday's deadline was not material, but there are other deadlines that are. Let's consider an applicant who is considering submitting a round 2 application to Haas (due 11/29/12):

In this case, the applicant experiences the following possible outcomes:

Admission to both schools: 1%
Admission to Stanford and not Haas: 6%
Admission to Haas and not Stanford: 11%
Admission to neither: 82%

But if the odds of admission to Stanford are reduced to 2% based on my analysis above, the outcomes change to:

Admission to both schools: 0%
Admission to Stanford and not Haas: 2%
Admission to Haas and not Stanford: 12%
Admission to neither: 86%

So in essence, there is a marginal increase of 1% in the student's probability of ultimately attending Haas. If we presume that the value of the MBA to be the simple sum of the increase in applicant salary for the number of post-MBA years worked**, the value of the Haas MBA is $88,819/year for 35 years to retirement, or $3,108,665. 1% of that would be $30,109, so the yet-to-be-invited applicant should be that much more interested in applying to Haas than before.


*I'm well aware that there is probably some co-variance between admission to various schools. I've never seen a good study on it, so we will have to just assume that there isn't any.
**This would require wage growth to equal the discount rate, which, although not necessarily accurate, is reasonable.
User avatar
machichi
User avatar
Joined: 02 May 2012
Last visit: 23 Jul 2015
Posts: 402
Own Kudos:
169
 [1]
Given Kudos: 78
Status:Yale! (whipped and bound)
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Nonprofit
Schools: Yale '15 (M) Haas '15 (WL) Stanford '15 (D) Kellogg '15 (A)
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V42
GPA: 3.41
Schools: Yale '15 (M) Haas '15 (WL) Stanford '15 (D) Kellogg '15 (A)
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V42
Posts: 402
Kudos: 169
 [1]
Stanford GSB 2013 - Calling all Applicants 20 Nov 2012, 16:08
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The point he was making was to stop obsessing. It's a meaningless pursuit and the statistical probability doesn't mean you should adjust your behavior or thinking.
avatar
kmcduw
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2012
Last visit: 11 Aug 2017
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
19
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance
Schools: Haas '14 (D) Tuck '14 (D) Stern '14 (D) HBS '14 (D) Wharton '15 (D) Stanford '15 (D) CBS '15 (D) Sloan '15 (D) Anderson '19 (A$) Foster '19 (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q48 V45
GPA: 3.71
WE:Accounting (Aerospace and Defense)
Schools: Haas '14 (D) Tuck '14 (D) Stern '14 (D) HBS '14 (D) Wharton '15 (D) Stanford '15 (D) CBS '15 (D) Sloan '15 (D) Anderson '19 (A$) Foster '19 (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q48 V45
Posts: 41
Kudos: 19
Stanford GSB 2013 - Calling all Applicants 20 Nov 2012, 16:17
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Statistical probability should most definitely affect decision making. Isn't that what we do NPV analyses for investments? Isn't that how we adjust EV for risk? Isn't that how we decide what states to visit on a political campaign? Isn't that how we decide whether to continue operations in a failing company?

I would say that EVERY decision should be made based on its statistical support. Then again, I ran a multiple regression to draft my fantasy football teams this year, so maybe I'm a bit extreme.

I would think the best argument here is saying that the change in outcome is immaterial. Even in my Stanford/Haas example, it would be very easy to claim that the applicant would have already been applying to Haas, so this new information wouldn't change anything, just increased the EV of the decision already made.
User avatar
machichi
User avatar
Joined: 02 May 2012
Last visit: 23 Jul 2015
Posts: 402
Own Kudos:
169
 [2]
Given Kudos: 78
Status:Yale! (whipped and bound)
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Nonprofit
Schools: Yale '15 (M) Haas '15 (WL) Stanford '15 (D) Kellogg '15 (A)
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V42
GPA: 3.41
Schools: Yale '15 (M) Haas '15 (WL) Stanford '15 (D) Kellogg '15 (A)
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V42
Posts: 402
Kudos: 169
 [2]
Stanford GSB 2013 - Calling all Applicants 20 Nov 2012, 16:21
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
You already made your decision based on the probability you saw for yourself in being accepted. You believe you had a chance, like all of us, and applied. Your probability of admission is more or less the same as when you applied.

Go take a spa day.
avatar
SeasaltNPepper
avatar
Joined: 19 Nov 2012
Last visit: 20 Feb 2013
Posts: 2
Own Kudos:
2
 [1]
Concentration: Strategy
GPA: 3.52
Posts: 2
Kudos: 2
 [1]
Stanford GSB 2013 - Calling all Applicants 20 Nov 2012, 16:26
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kmcduw
I would say that EVERY decision should be made based on its statistical support.
Show more

I don't know man. (woman?). This admissions process, just like dating, is far too subjective to put effort into doing any sort of mathematical analysis. A lot of what is involved on the adcoms' part is intuition, gut, and an overall sense for how attractive a person's candidacy is - which is not always quantifiable. Just do the best you can in your apps, apply to where you want to go, and that's it.
avatar
kmcduw
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2012
Last visit: 11 Aug 2017
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
19
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance
Schools: Haas '14 (D) Tuck '14 (D) Stern '14 (D) HBS '14 (D) Wharton '15 (D) Stanford '15 (D) CBS '15 (D) Sloan '15 (D) Anderson '19 (A$) Foster '19 (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q48 V45
GPA: 3.71
WE:Accounting (Aerospace and Defense)
Schools: Haas '14 (D) Tuck '14 (D) Stern '14 (D) HBS '14 (D) Wharton '15 (D) Stanford '15 (D) CBS '15 (D) Sloan '15 (D) Anderson '19 (A$) Foster '19 (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q48 V45
Posts: 41
Kudos: 19
Stanford GSB 2013 - Calling all Applicants 20 Nov 2012, 16:45
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
machichi


Go take a spa day.
Show more


How ironic. I'm actually on PTO today--one of several days that I strategically scheduled in the Nov - Jan time frame for potential interviews. Sadly, I'm not interviewing today for any school.
avatar
kmcduw
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2012
Last visit: 11 Aug 2017
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
19
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance
Schools: Haas '14 (D) Tuck '14 (D) Stern '14 (D) HBS '14 (D) Wharton '15 (D) Stanford '15 (D) CBS '15 (D) Sloan '15 (D) Anderson '19 (A$) Foster '19 (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q48 V45
GPA: 3.71
WE:Accounting (Aerospace and Defense)
Schools: Haas '14 (D) Tuck '14 (D) Stern '14 (D) HBS '14 (D) Wharton '15 (D) Stanford '15 (D) CBS '15 (D) Sloan '15 (D) Anderson '19 (A$) Foster '19 (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q48 V45
Posts: 41
Kudos: 19
Stanford GSB 2013 - Calling all Applicants 20 Nov 2012, 16:48
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
SeasaltNPepper
kmcduw
I would say that EVERY decision should be made based on its statistical support.

I don't know man. yes, man(woman?). This admissions process, just like dating, is far too subjective to put effort into doing any sort of mathematical analysis. A lot of what is involved on the adcoms' part is intuition, gut, and an overall sense for how attractive a person's candidacy is - which is not always quantifiable. Just do the best you can in your apps, apply to where you want to go, and that's it.
Show more


Agreed. There are quantitative factors and subjective factors. However, the subjective factors are basically considered random noise that impairs the statistic. If there were no subjective factors, we'd all know if we were accepted before we ever applied. Instead we have to summarize them into cumulative probabilities across all applicants.
avatar
dawizard
avatar
Joined: 14 Oct 2012
Last visit: 21 Feb 2013
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
2
Given Kudos: 2
Schools: Kellogg 1YR '14
Schools: Kellogg 1YR '14
Posts: 20
Kudos: 2
Stanford GSB 2013 - Calling all Applicants 20 Nov 2012, 16:54
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
kmcduw
Statistical probability should most definitely affect decision making. Isn't that what we do NPV analyses for investments? Isn't that how we adjust EV for risk? Isn't that how we decide what states to visit on a political campaign? Isn't that how we decide whether to continue operations in a failing company?

I would say that EVERY decision should be made based on its statistical support. Then again, I ran a multiple regression to draft my fantasy football teams this year, so maybe I'm a bit extreme.

I would think the best argument here is saying that the change in outcome is immaterial. Even in my Stanford/Haas example, it would be very easy to claim that the applicant would have already been applying to Haas, so this new information wouldn't change anything, just increased the EV of the decision already made.
Show more

I don't do NPV analysis or adjust EV for risk. I won't even google it for that matter.

Btw Nate Silver called, he wants his stats notes back. Cheers =)
avatar
Edubs
avatar
Joined: 15 Nov 2012
Last visit: 05 Apr 2016
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
2
 [1]
Schools: Stanford '15 (S)
Schools: Stanford '15 (S)
Posts: 4
Kudos: 2
 [1]
Stanford GSB 2013 - Calling all Applicants 20 Nov 2012, 17:01
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Quote:
Initial expectation of an interview is 14%, not 7%.

Yes, my personal anecdote re: a decision on whether to renew my season tickets by last Friday's deadline was not material, but there are other deadlines that are. Let's consider an applicant who is considering submitting a round 2 application to Haas (due 11/29/12):

In this case, the applicant experiences the following possible outcomes:

Admission to both schools: 1%
Admission to Stanford and not Haas: 6%
Admission to Haas and not Stanford: 11%
Admission to neither: 82%

But if the odds of admission to Stanford are reduced to 2% based on my analysis above, the outcomes change to:

Admission to both schools: 0%
Admission to Stanford and not Haas: 2%
Admission to Haas and not Stanford: 12%
Admission to neither: 86%

So in essence, there is a marginal increase of 1% in the student's probability of ultimately attending Haas. If we presume that the value of the MBA to be the simple sum of the increase in applicant salary for the number of post-MBA years worked**, the value of the Haas MBA is $88,819/year for 35 years to retirement, or $3,108,665. 1% of that would be $30,109, so the yet-to-be-invited applicant should be that much more interested in applying to Haas than before.


*I'm well aware that there is probably some co-variance between admission to various schools. I've never seen a good study on it, so we will have to just assume that there isn't any.
**This would require wage growth to equal the discount rate, which, although not necessarily accurate, is reasonable.
Show more

Wow...this just doesn't appear to be a valuable use of time. There is a point were the formal analysis ends and sense kicks in. No class, not even at Stanford, can teach you where that line is.
User avatar
machichi
User avatar
Joined: 02 May 2012
Last visit: 23 Jul 2015
Posts: 402
Own Kudos:
169
Given Kudos: 78
Status:Yale! (whipped and bound)
Location: United States (CA)
Concentration: Nonprofit
Schools: Yale '15 (M) Haas '15 (WL) Stanford '15 (D) Kellogg '15 (A)
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V42
GPA: 3.41
Schools: Yale '15 (M) Haas '15 (WL) Stanford '15 (D) Kellogg '15 (A)
GMAT 1: 730 Q48 V42
Posts: 402
Kudos: 169
Stanford GSB 2013 - Calling all Applicants 20 Nov 2012, 17:26
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dawizard
Btw Nate Silver called, he wants his stats notes back. Cheers =)
Show more

Also Nate Silver is GAY. I'm so in love.
avatar
kmcduw
avatar
Joined: 17 Mar 2012
Last visit: 11 Aug 2017
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
19
Location: United States
Concentration: Finance
Schools: Haas '14 (D) Tuck '14 (D) Stern '14 (D) HBS '14 (D) Wharton '15 (D) Stanford '15 (D) CBS '15 (D) Sloan '15 (D) Anderson '19 (A$) Foster '19 (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q48 V45
GPA: 3.71
WE:Accounting (Aerospace and Defense)
Schools: Haas '14 (D) Tuck '14 (D) Stern '14 (D) HBS '14 (D) Wharton '15 (D) Stanford '15 (D) CBS '15 (D) Sloan '15 (D) Anderson '19 (A$) Foster '19 (A)
GMAT 1: 760 Q48 V45
Posts: 41
Kudos: 19
Stanford GSB 2013 - Calling all Applicants 20 Nov 2012, 17:28
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Yes. I feel like I spent more time trying to justify the value of knowing that the odds of being invited are now at 4% than I did figuring out that they were 4%. Coming up with the 4% probably took me about 5 minutes, and I figured some folks might be curious, considering that everyone posting has been trying to figure out if they are still in the game. Maybe I'll preface any other quick and dirty analysis with a disclaimer that I'm not going to waste my time explaining it.
avatar
dwal44
avatar
Joined: 29 Oct 2010
Last visit: 27 Apr 2015
Posts: 82
Own Kudos:
30
Given Kudos: 18
Schools: HBS '15 (D) Stanford '15 (D) Booth '15 (A)
Posts: 82
Kudos: 30
Stanford GSB 2013 - Calling all Applicants 21 Nov 2012, 01:21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It would be AWESOME if someone could PM me with specifics about the interview. I tried to help others out after my Booth interview and my GSB interview is coming up in a few days. Thanks in advance!
avatar
GPT55
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 04 Mar 2011
Last visit: 24 Jun 2013
Posts: 127
Own Kudos:
41
 [1]
Given Kudos: 38
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Haas '15 (M) Yale '15 (A) Stanford '15 (D) Booth '15 (D) Stern '15 (A$)
GMAT 1: 700 Q44 V41
GMAT 2: 720 Q47 V41
WE:Law (Non-Profit and Government)
Schools: Haas '15 (M) Yale '15 (A) Stanford '15 (D) Booth '15 (D) Stern '15 (A$)
GMAT 2: 720 Q47 V41
Posts: 127
Kudos: 41
 [1]
Stanford GSB 2013 - Calling all Applicants 21 Nov 2012, 12:15
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
OK, people who submitted for R1, who else got a heart attack after reading the sender and the first three words of the subject line of today's e-mail reminder about Round 2 deadlines? :lol:
User avatar
astrochris
User avatar
Joined: 28 Feb 2011
Last visit: 23 May 2013
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
20
Given Kudos: 13
Location: Brazil
Schools: HBS '15 (D) Stanford '15 (S) Booth '15 (WL) Kellogg '15 (A) Sloan '15 CBS '15
GMAT 1: 710 Q46 V42
WE:Management Consulting (Consulting)
Schools: HBS '15 (D) Stanford '15 (S) Booth '15 (WL) Kellogg '15 (A) Sloan '15 CBS '15
GMAT 1: 710 Q46 V42
Posts: 91
Kudos: 20
Stanford GSB 2013 - Calling all Applicants 21 Nov 2012, 12:41
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
GPT55
OK, people who submitted for R1, who else got a heart attack after reading the sender and the first three words of the subject line of today's e-mail reminder about Round 2 deadlines? :lol:
Show more

I didn`t get this email!
   1  ...  13   14   15   16   17  ...  54   
Moderator:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts