Last visit was: 26 Apr 2026, 17:05 It is currently 26 Apr 2026, 17:05
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
655-705 (Hard)|   Pronouns|         
User avatar
mun23
User avatar
Joined: 06 Dec 2012
Last visit: 26 Apr 2013
Posts: 96
Own Kudos:
1,848
 [29]
Given Kudos: 46
Status:struggling with GMAT
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Accounting
GMAT Date: 04-06-2013
GPA: 3.65
Posts: 96
Kudos: 1,848
 [29]
The board follows policies that are unreasonably strict and 03 Mar 2013, 14:49
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
24
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

65% (hard)

Question Stats:

49% (01:29) correct 51% (01:37) wrong based on 801 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
The board follows policies that are unreasonably strict and so inflexible that they refuse to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when justifiable.

(A)they refuse to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when
(B)it refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when it is
(C)it refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences to be taken even when they are
(D)permitting leaves of absences is not discussed even when
(E)discussion of permitting leaves of absences is refused even when they will be

Need explanation...................
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
C
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,474
Own Kudos:
30,887
 [20]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,474
Kudos: 30,887
 [20]
The board follows policies that are unreasonably strict and 04 Mar 2013, 16:02
7
Kudos
Add Kudos
13
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mun23
The board follows policies that are unreasonably strict and so inflexible that they refuse to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when justifiable.
(A) they refuse to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when
(B) it refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when it is
(C) it refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences to be taken even when they are
(D) permitting leaves of absences is not discussed even when
(E) discussion of permitting leaves of absences is refused even when they will be

Hi Mike
whats the problem with sentence A&D`s construction...............Whats the use of "even when"

Whats the difference between even when justifiable and even when it is justifiable?
Show more
Dear mun23 ----
I'm sorry, I was interrupted in the middle of writing that, and I completely forget to explain that section. My apologies.

The word "when" is a subordinate conjunction --- its role is to introduce a subordinate clause. Like any clause, a subordinate clause has a full [noun]+[verb] that, without the word when, could stand on its own as a complete sentence. Thus, the construction "when it is justifiable" is perfectly correct, because we have a full [noun]+[verb] clause following the word when --- the clause "it is justifiable" could stand on its own as a complete [noun]+[verb] sentence.

The GMAT does not approve of the structure [subordinate conjunction]+[adjective]:
= when justified
= when ready
= although tired
= while hesitant
etc. etc.
These are very common in colloquial American speech, but they do not conform to the formal standards of the GMAT. Choices (A) & (D) make this mistake.

Does that make sense?

Mike :-)
General Discussion
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,474
Own Kudos:
30,887
 [4]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,474
Kudos: 30,887
 [4]
The board follows policies that are unreasonably strict and 04 Mar 2013, 12:04
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mun23
The board follows policies that are unreasonably strict and so inflexible that they refuse to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when justifiable.
(A) they refuse to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when
(B) it refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when it is
(C) it refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences to be taken even when they are
(D) permitting leaves of absences is not discussed even when
(E) discussion of permitting leaves of absences is refused even when they will be
Need explanation...................
Show more
I'm happy to help. :-)

Classic pronoun issues. The subject, "board", is singular, and correctly has the singular verb "follows" ---- even though this board presumably is made up multiple people, those people are not mentioned explicitly, and therefore it is 100% illegal to use a plural pronoun referring to them. To refer to the board, we must use a singular pronoun. That's why (A) is dead wrong.

(D) & (E) are horrible weak & wordy passive constructions. The GMAT generally does not approve of passive constructions when something active is possible. Here's a blog on this issue:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/active-vs- ... -the-gmat/

Another issue with (A) & (D) --- the GMAT SC doesn't like the construction [

(B) contains another pronoun issue --- "leaves of absence" is plural, and (B) uses the singular pronoun "it" to refer to them.

Choice (C) gets all the pronoun correct, and it is active, direct, and powerful. It is the best answer.

Does all this make sense?

Mike :-)
User avatar
mun23
User avatar
Joined: 06 Dec 2012
Last visit: 26 Apr 2013
Posts: 96
Own Kudos:
1,848
 [1]
Given Kudos: 46
Status:struggling with GMAT
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Accounting
GMAT Date: 04-06-2013
GPA: 3.65
Posts: 96
Kudos: 1,848
 [1]
The board follows policies that are unreasonably strict and 04 Mar 2013, 15:23
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
mun23
The board follows policies that are unreasonably strict and so inflexible that they refuse to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when justifiable.
(A) they refuse to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when
(B) it refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when it is
(C) it refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences to be taken even when they are
(D) permitting leaves of absences is not discussed even when
(E) discussion of permitting leaves of absences is refused even when they will be
Need explanation...................
I'm happy to help. :-)

Classic pronoun issues. The subject, "board", is singular, and correctly has the singular verb "follows" ---- even though this board presumably is made up multiple people, those people are not mentioned explicitly, and therefore it is 100% illegal to use a plural pronoun referring to them. To refer to the board, we must use a singular pronoun. That's why (A) is dead wrong.

(D) & (E) are horrible weak & wordy passive constructions. The GMAT generally does not approve of passive constructions when something active is possible. Here's a blog on this issue:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/active-vs- ... -the-gmat/

Another issue with (A) & (D) --- the GMAT SC doesn't like the construction [

(B) contains another pronoun issue --- "leaves of absence" is plural, and (B) uses the singular pronoun "it" to refer to them.

Choice (C) gets all the pronoun correct, and it is active, direct, and powerful. It is the best answer.

Does all this make sense?

Mike :-)
Show more
Hi Mike
whats the problem with sentence A&D`s construction...............Whats the use of "even when"

Whats the difference between even when justifiable and even when it is justifiable ?
User avatar
mun23
User avatar
Joined: 06 Dec 2012
Last visit: 26 Apr 2013
Posts: 96
Own Kudos:
1,848
Given Kudos: 46
Status:struggling with GMAT
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Accounting
GMAT Date: 04-06-2013
GPA: 3.65
Posts: 96
Kudos: 1,848
The board follows policies that are unreasonably strict and 04 Mar 2013, 16:24
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
mun23
The board follows policies that are unreasonably strict and so inflexible that they refuse to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when justifiable.
(A) they refuse to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when
(B) it refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when it is
(C) it refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences to be taken even when they are
(D) permitting leaves of absences is not discussed even when
(E) discussion of permitting leaves of absences is refused even when they will be

Hi Mike
whats the problem with sentence A&D`s construction...............Whats the use of "even when"

Whats the difference between even when justifiable and even when it is justifiable?
Dear mun23 ----
I'm sorry, I was interrupted in the middle of writing that, and I completely forget to explain that section. My apologies.

The word "when" is a subordinate conjunction --- its role is to introduce a subordinate clause. Like any clause, a subordinate clause has a full [noun]+[verb] that, without the word when, could stand on its own as a complete sentence. Thus, the construction "when it is justifiable" is perfectly correct, because we have a full [noun]+[verb] clause following the word when --- the clause "it is justifiable" could stand on its own as a complete [noun]+[verb] sentence.

The GMAT does not approve of the structure [subordinate conjunction]+[adjective]:
= when justified
= when ready
= although tired
= while hesitant
etc. etc.
These are very common in colloquial American speech, but they do not conform to the formal standards of the GMAT. Choices (A) & (D) make this mistake.

Does that make sense?

Mike :-)
Show more
Hi Mike
1 kudos for you.thanks for explanation
avatar
domfrancondumas
avatar
Joined: 11 Jul 2013
Last visit: 19 Nov 2013
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
33
Given Kudos: 92
Posts: 28
Kudos: 33
The board follows policies that are unreasonably strict and 18 Oct 2013, 00:23
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
mun23
The board follows policies that are unreasonably strict and so inflexible that they refuse to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when justifiable.
(A) they refuse to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when
(B) it refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when it is
(C) it refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences to be taken even when they are
(D) permitting leaves of absences is not discussed even when
(E) discussion of permitting leaves of absences is refused even when they will be

Hi Mike
whats the problem with sentence A&D`s construction...............Whats the use of "even when"

Whats the difference between even when justifiable and even when it is justifiable?
Dear mun23 ----
I'm sorry, I was interrupted in the middle of writing that, and I completely forget to explain that section. My apologies.

The word "when" is a subordinate conjunction --- its role is to introduce a subordinate clause. Like any clause, a subordinate clause has a full [noun]+[verb] that, without the word when, could stand on its own as a complete sentence. Thus, the construction "when it is justifiable" is perfectly correct, because we have a full [noun]+[verb] clause following the word when --- the clause "it is justifiable" could stand on its own as a complete [noun]+[verb] sentence.

The GMAT does not approve of the structure [subordinate conjunction]+[adjective]:
= when justified
= when ready
= although tired
= while hesitant
etc. etc.
These are very common in colloquial American speech, but they do not conform to the formal standards of the GMAT. Choices (A) & (D) make this mistake.

Does that make sense?

Mike :-)
Show more

Hi mike
C) it refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences to be taken even when they are
Choice C is the best answer. But isn't permitting and to be taken redundant?

Thanks in advance.
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,474
Own Kudos:
30,887
 [2]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,474
Kudos: 30,887
 [2]
The board follows policies that are unreasonably strict and 18 Oct 2013, 10:27
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
domfrancondumas
Hi mike
C) it refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences to be taken even when they are
Choice C is the best answer. But isn't permitting and to be taken redundant?

Thanks in advance.
Show more
Dear domfrancondumas

I'm happy to help. :-)

It's true that if we just had ...
(1) The board doesn't permit leaves of absence
(2) The board doesn't permit leaves of absence to be taken.
... then maybe we could argue that the extra phrase would be redundant and/or unnecessary. In this stripped down version, it's not perfectly clear, but one could make an argument that the phrase is redundant. BUT, we always must consider the full context of the sentence. Here's version (C):

(C) The board follows policies that are unreasonably strict and so inflexible that it refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences to be taken even when they are justifiable.

In this sentence we want to say that the board "refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences", and then we want to emphasize that it refuses discussing them even when these leaves of absences are justifiable. Consider version (C) without the words "to be taken" ---

(C') The board follows policies that are unreasonably strict and so inflexible that it refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when they are justifiable.

Hmmm. When it is justifiable to discuss the leave? When it is justifiable to permit the leave? When it is justifiable to take the leave? The "to be taken" makes crystal clear exactly what about the leaves is justifiable. Is this clarification necessary? Maybe, maybe not, but the fact that there's even a question about whether it could be necessary means that including it cannot be dismissed a redundant because the phrase may be serving a necessarily clarifying purpose for someone.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
avatar
domfrancondumas
avatar
Joined: 11 Jul 2013
Last visit: 19 Nov 2013
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
33
Given Kudos: 92
Posts: 28
Kudos: 33
The board follows policies that are unreasonably strict and 18 Oct 2013, 10:49
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
domfrancondumas
Hi mike
C) it refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences to be taken even when they are
Choice C is the best answer. But isn't permitting and to be taken redundant?

Thanks in advance.
Dear domfrancondumas

I'm happy to help. :-)

It's true that if we just had ...
(1) The board doesn't permit leaves of absence
(2) The board doesn't permit leaves of absence to be taken.
... then maybe we could argue that the extra phrase would be redundant and/or unnecessary. In this stripped down version, it's not perfectly clear, but one could make an argument that the phrase is redundant. BUT, we always must consider the full context of the sentence. Here's version (C):

(C) The board follows policies that are unreasonably strict and so inflexible that it refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences to be taken even when they are justifiable.

In this sentence we want to say that the board "refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences", and then we want to emphasize that it refuses discussing them even when these leaves of absences are justifiable. Consider version (C) without the words "to be taken" ---

(C') The board follows policies that are unreasonably strict and so inflexible that it refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when they are justifiable.

Hmmm. When it is justifiable to discuss the leave? When it is justifiable to permit the leave? When it is justifiable to take the leave? The "to be taken" makes crystal clear exactly what about the leaves is justifiable. Is this clarification necessary? Maybe, maybe not, but the fact that there's even a question about whether it could be necessary means that including it cannot be dismissed a redundant because the phrase may be serving a necessarily clarifying purpose for someone.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
Show more

Thanks a ton mike for the awesome explanation..
Yeah, now it does make sense and its clear.. :) :)
User avatar
rezaulnsu
User avatar
Joined: 22 Aug 2014
Last visit: 21 Aug 2016
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
31
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 23
Kudos: 31
 [1]
The board follows policies that are unreasonably strict and 29 Feb 2016, 06:58
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Lets find out splits:
first 'it or they': the board is clearly singular; so, 'it' fits here - 'they' doesn't. So, A is out.
last 'it or they': the meaning of the sentence suggests that the antecedent here is 'leaves ' which is plural. So, B is out.
even when: after even when, we use clause; so, D is out and A is already dead.
So, A, B, D are all out.
'will be' or 'are': Using unnecessary future is awkward and distorts the meaning. So, E can be out for the tense issue. Moreover, in E, usage of passive after so adj that construction is really doubtful and seems both unnecessary and awkward.
User avatar
thangvietname
User avatar
Joined: 09 Jun 2010
Last visit: 28 Jun 2017
Posts: 514
Own Kudos:
573
Given Kudos: 916
Posts: 514
Kudos: 573
The board follows policies that are unreasonably strict and 29 Feb 2016, 22:06
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mun23
The board follows policies that are unreasonably strict and so inflexible that they refuse to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when justifiable.

(A)they refuse to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when
(B)it refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when it is
(C)it refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences to be taken even when they are
(D)permitting leaves of absences is not discussed even when
(E)discussion of permitting leaves of absences is refused even when they will be

Need explanation...................
Show more

it take me 3 minute to do this question.
in A, when justifiable refers to they, which refers to policies. no sense
in B , it is justifiable make no sense. leaves should be justifiable.
in d, when justifiable refer to leaves. no sense.
in E, "will" is not used in time clause,
User avatar
ashutoshsh
User avatar
Joined: 07 Mar 2016
Last visit: 07 Feb 2017
Posts: 53
Own Kudos:
183
Given Kudos: 163
Posts: 53
Kudos: 183
The board follows policies that are unreasonably strict and 07 Jul 2016, 01:08
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
mun23
The board follows policies that are unreasonably strict and so inflexible that they refuse to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when justifiable.
(A) they refuse to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when
(B) it refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when it is
(C) it refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences to be taken even when they are
(D) permitting leaves of absences is not discussed even when
(E) discussion of permitting leaves of absences is refused even when they will be
Need explanation...................
I'm happy to help. :-)

Classic pronoun issues. The subject, "board", is singular, and correctly has the singular verb "follows" ---- even though this board presumably is made up multiple people, those people are not mentioned explicitly, and therefore it is 100% illegal to use a plural pronoun referring to them. To refer to the board, we must use a singular pronoun. That's why (A) is dead wrong.

(D) & (E) are horrible weak & wordy passive constructions. The GMAT generally does not approve of passive constructions when something active is possible. Here's a blog on this issue:
https://magoosh.com/gmat/2012/active-vs- ... -the-gmat/

Another issue with (A) & (D) --- the GMAT SC doesn't like the construction [

(B) contains another pronoun issue --- "leaves of absence" is plural, and (B) uses the singular pronoun "it" to refer to them.

Choice (C) gets all the pronoun correct, and it is active, direct, and powerful. It is the best answer.

Does all this make sense?

Mike :-)
Show more

Hi mike!
I read the options differently. I was thinking that "it" in option B is indicating the "discussion" and discussion is something that is justifiable. Can you tell me if there is some way to avoid such mistakes.
Thanks
avatar
Virgo
avatar
Joined: 20 Jun 2012
Last visit: 11 Feb 2018
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
19
Given Kudos: 3
Location: India
Schools: Broad '19 ISB '18 Rotman '19 Kelley '19 Jones '19 Mendoza '19 Goizueta '19 Smeal Penn State "19 Carey '19 Arizona State"19 NUS '19 Olin '19
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
GPA: 3.11
Schools: Broad '19 ISB '18 Rotman '19 Kelley '19 Jones '19 Mendoza '19 Goizueta '19 Smeal Penn State "19 Carey '19 Arizona State"19 NUS '19 Olin '19
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V37
Posts: 10
Kudos: 19
The board follows policies that are unreasonably strict and 26 Sep 2016, 04:40
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mikemcgarry
domfrancondumas
Hi mike
C) it refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences to be taken even when they are
Choice C is the best answer. But isn't permitting and to be taken redundant?

Thanks in advance.
Dear domfrancondumas

I'm happy to help. :-)

It's true that if we just had ...
(1) The board doesn't permit leaves of absence
(2) The board doesn't permit leaves of absence to be taken.
... then maybe we could argue that the extra phrase would be redundant and/or unnecessary. In this stripped down version, it's not perfectly clear, but one could make an argument that the phrase is redundant. BUT, we always must consider the full context of the sentence. Here's version (C):

(C) The board follows policies that are unreasonably strict and so inflexible that it refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences to be taken even when they are justifiable.

In this sentence we want to say that the board "refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences", and then we want to emphasize that it refuses discussing them even when these leaves of absences are justifiable. Consider version (C) without the words "to be taken" ---

(C') The board follows policies that are unreasonably strict and so inflexible that it refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when they are justifiable.

Hmmm. When it is justifiable to discuss the leave? When it is justifiable to permit the leave? When it is justifiable to take the leave? The "to be taken" makes crystal clear exactly what about the leaves is justifiable. Is this clarification necessary? Maybe, maybe not, but the fact that there's even a question about whether it could be necessary means that including it cannot be dismissed a redundant because the phrase may be serving a necessarily clarifying purpose for someone.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
Show more



Mike

Option B can be justified in following way:

It is a pronoun which refers to the previous singular noun or acting noun i.e. GERUND "permitting" , which makes sense with the word justifiable thereby meaning that permitting was justifiable but board is not ready to discuss it.

I understand that first "it" refers to the board correctly.

Does this make sense?? Kindly point out error in my reasoning.
User avatar
Abhishek009
User avatar
Board of Directors
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Last visit: 17 Dec 2025
Posts: 5,902
Own Kudos:
5,456
Given Kudos: 463
Status:QA & VA Forum Moderator
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Commercial Banking)
Posts: 5,902
Kudos: 5,456
The board follows policies that are unreasonably strict and 26 Sep 2016, 07:55
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Virgo


Option B can be justified in following way:

It is a pronoun which refers to the previous singular noun or acting noun i.e. GERUND "permitting" , which makes sense with the word justifiable thereby meaning that permitting was justifiable but board is not ready to discuss it.

I understand that first "it" refers to the board correctly.

Does this make sense?? Kindly point out error in my reasoning.
Show more

Please go through mikemcgarry 's explanation -

Quote:
(B) contains another pronoun issue --- "leaves of absence" is plural, and (B) uses the singular pronoun "it" to refer to them.
Show more

Hope this helps...
User avatar
mikemcgarry
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Dec 2011
Last visit: 06 Aug 2018
Posts: 4,474
Own Kudos:
30,887
 [2]
Given Kudos: 130
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 4,474
Kudos: 30,887
 [2]
The board follows policies that are unreasonably strict and 26 Sep 2016, 11:28
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Virgo
Mike

Option B can be justified in following way:

It is a pronoun which refers to the previous singular noun or acting noun i.e. GERUND "permitting" , which makes sense with the word justifiable thereby meaning that permitting was justifiable but board is not ready to discuss it.

I understand that first "it" refers to the board correctly.

Does this make sense?? Kindly point out error in my reasoning.
Show more
Dear Virgo,

I'm happy to respond. :-)

I will say a couple things. First of all , here's the ending of option (B)
... refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when it is justifiable.
Many students make the mistake of view grammar as a kind of mathematical exercise, without taking into account other layers of the sentence. In fact, grammar is always rooted in logic and meaning, which are the truly powerful currents in a sentence. Grammar is a surface feature that simply reflects these depths.
Think about the situation. What is the controversial item? The "leaves of absences" provide the hot controversy here. Are they permitted or not? Are we even going to discuss whether they are permitted? The "leaves of absences" are the focal point of this controversy. Thus, when we specifying the parameters of this controversy, it makes the most sentence to focus on the heart of the controversy---even when the leaves of absences are justifiable. It would be rhetorically & logically awkward to end that sentence: "even when permitting the leaves of absences is justifiable." That is somewhat awkward phrasing, and also it sounds evasive: why are we shifting the focus to something other than the heart of the controversy? Anything that sounds evasive sound indirect, and the business world & the GMAT like clear, forthright, direct language. Any sensible person would not do business with someone who seemed to be hiding something, and the language preferences on the GMAT reflect this. These ideas form one important consideration about option (B).

A much more tangible consideration in (B):
... it refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when it is justifiable.
The same pronoun typically cannot refer to two different antecedents in the same sentence. If there are two independent clauses, and the pronoun uses are separate enough, then sometimes this is OK. In this sentence, though, the use is too close, and the same pronoun is referring to two different things. That's an automatic disqualifier on the GMAT SC.

Does all this make sense?
Mike :-)
avatar
Shobhit7
avatar
Joined: 01 Feb 2017
Last visit: 29 Apr 2021
Posts: 239
Own Kudos:
432
Given Kudos: 148
Posts: 239
Kudos: 432
The board follows policies that are unreasonably strict and 11 Apr 2019, 13:09
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A)they refuse to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when: PRONOUN ERROR / BOARD IS A COLLECTIVE NOUN AND USED AS SINGULAR SUBJECT IN MAIN CLAUSE.

(B)it refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences even when it is: LOGICAL ANTECEDENT OF 'IT'= 'LEAVES OF ABSENCES' IS A PLURAL NOUN.

(C)it refuses to discuss permitting leaves of absences to be taken even when they are: BEST OF THE LOT.

(D)permitting leaves of absences is not discussed even when: NON ELLIPSE VERSION: EVEN WHEN LEAVES OF ABSENCES ARE JUSTIFIABLE. NOW, WE CAN ONLY OMIT THE REPETITIONS: ONLY THOSE WORDS THAT ARE PRESENT IN CLAUSE BEFORE. HERE, LINKING VERB 'ARE' IS NOT MENTIONED. HENCE, ELLIPSE VERSION IS INCORRECT.

(E)discussion of permitting leaves of absences is refused even when they will be: 'WILL BE': INCORRECT TENSE CONTEXTUALLY.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,425
Own Kudos:
1,010
Posts: 19,425
Kudos: 1,010
The board follows policies that are unreasonably strict and 02 Jan 2023, 15:44
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
AbhishekP220108
506 posts
bhanu29
361 posts