The high costs to taxpayers were mostly a result of policies that guarantee cotton farmers a portion of their projected revenue,
rather than of coverage paying them for damaged crops.This seemingly simple topic of comparison has some subtle pitfall of redundancy in one of the tempting choices. Now let’s see.
A --- rather than of coverage paying them for damaged crops -----
This is the subtle pitfall I refered to about. Here the comparison is between what were the causes of higher costs? Whether policies or coverage? If you parse the clauses somewhat carefully, you will get the following structure:
The high costs to taxpayers were mostly a result of (policies that guarantee cotton farmers a portion of their projected revenue, rather than of coverage paying them for damaged crops.) You can see that he phrase ‘as result of’ already carries the preposition ‘of” and using ‘of’ again for coverage is redundant in A. That is why D is the preferred choice. B instead of their coverage that pays for damaged crops --
simple reason to dump this is the inappropriate of instead of , apart from the ambiguity of the pronoun reference of ‘their’C as opposed to coverage paying them for damaged crops---
as opposed to is unidiomatic diction ; D rather than coverage that pays them for damaged crops –
right choice E instead of coverage that pays them for damaged crop -
-inappropriate use of instead of”; Is it a typo that it is ‘crop’ instead of crops’?