Hi mike1122,You're asking two good questions. Let me take them one at a time, because they actually come from the same place.
First, remember what the conclusion is:
"The student population is completely lacking in proper social skills" - a sweeping claim about
everyone, based on one week of personal observation. That's the weak spot every answer should be measured against.
Why C doesn't weaken itChoice C says the narrator
is a student and has interacted with many students. Look at the direction this pushes: it makes the narrator's observations sound
more informed, not less. If anything, it props the conclusion up. To weaken, you need something that makes "the whole population lacks social skills"
less believable - and C does the opposite. That's why it's out.
The assumption you're questioning in BHere's the key idea for CR:
weakening doesn't mean disproving. You don't have to show the narrator
definitely couldn't have met all
50,000 students. You only have to make the sweeping conclusion
harder to justify - and B does exactly that. One person, one week, a population of
50,000: the sample the narrator actually saw is a tiny slice, so declaring the
entire population deficient is unsupported.
Your "what if he met them all at a concert?" is the trap to watch. The stimulus never says that - you're importing a scenario the argument doesn't give you. In CR, judge only what's stated. What's stated is:
one week, huge population. B uses only those facts to expose the overreach.
Quick gut check on "weaken":- "This restaurant is terrible - the one dish I tried was cold."
- Which weakens it more:
"the reviewer tried many dishes" (like C), or
"the menu has 200 dishes" (like B)?
The second one instantly makes the sweeping judgment look shaky - without needing to prove the reviewer tried nothing else. Same move as B here.
Answer: Bmike1122
Can any of the experts have a look at this problem?
Can you please explain why C is not the correct answer. Also, if we assume that indeed B is the correct answer, why is the question assuming that the student couldn't have met 50k students in a week?
Thank you.