Last visit was: 02 Sep 2026, 07:32 It is currently 02 Sep 2026, 07:32
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
ajaym28
Joined: 14 Apr 2014
Last visit: 13 Mar 2016
Posts: 51
Own Kudos:
727
 [15]
Given Kudos: 196
Posts: 51
Kudos: 727
 [15]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
12
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 11,288
Own Kudos:
46,064
 [2]
Given Kudos: 339
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,288
Kudos: 46,064
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
avikroy
Joined: 04 Jun 2010
Last visit: 26 Mar 2020
Posts: 94
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 264
Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.22
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
Posts: 94
Kudos: 34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chetan2u
SandyNik
ajaym28
Ever since I arrived at the college last week, I've been shocked by the poor behavior of the students. The student population is completely lacking in proper social skills.
Which of the following, if true, would weaken the above conclusion?

A) Students who are away from their parents often exhibit rude behavior.
B) The college numbers over 50,000 students.
C) The narrator is a student and has interacted with many students.
D) Social skills should not be expected of college students.
E) The narrator was reluctant to stay at the college.


Hi ajaym28, I chose A because, assumption is that students demonstrate poor behaviour in social environment. But when option A is negated, then it means students don't demonstrate the poor behaviour in more social environment hence they don't lack in social skills.

Can you pse post the OE and the source of the Q

Hi,
assumpption A cannot be correct answer as we are not debating reason for being rude. but we have to weaken the conclusion that the student population completely lacks social ethos. B is the closest when it sys that 50000 students are there and one week stay is too less to interact with all these people and make a statement for all of them...
catch word is completely


"completely" and generalising by saying" student population" :)
avatar
shalabh3103
Joined: 18 Jun 2018
Last visit: 14 Nov 2021
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
11
 [1]
Given Kudos: 35
Posts: 9
Kudos: 11
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I went with E since it gives motive for the narrator to generalize even if the population on a whole does not lack social skills.
User avatar
ayushgmatclub1
Joined: 11 Jan 2018
Last visit: 08 May 2022
Posts: 54
Own Kudos:
19
 [2]
Given Kudos: 337
Posts: 54
Kudos: 19
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I disagree with OA B.
We can't assume that he would not have been able to meet 50,000 students and would have judged all of them.
What if he did get to interact with them in a concert or something?
Basically B requires a strong assumption of our own to be correct.
User avatar
mike1122
Joined: 09 Feb 2025
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 43
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q87 V84 DI80
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q87 V84 DI80
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can any of the experts have a look at this problem?
Can you please explain why C is not the correct answer. Also, if we assume that indeed B is the correct answer, why is the question assuming that the student couldn't have met 50k students in a week?

Thank you.
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 1,815
Own Kudos:
14,306
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,815
Kudos: 14,306
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Ever since I arrived at the college last week, I've been shocked by the poor behavior of the students. The student population is completely lacking in proper social skills.

Which of the following, if true, would weaken the above conclusion?


The narrator generalizes from the students observed during just one week to the entire student population. The best weakener shows that the observed students may represent only a small portion of that population.

(A) Students who are away from their parents often exhibit rude behavior.

Incorrect. This may explain the rude behavior, but it does not show that the narrator's conclusion about the students' social skills is wrong.

(B) The college numbers over 50,000 students.

Correct. With such a large student population, the narrator is unlikely to have observed enough students in one week to justify a conclusion about all of them. This weakens the generalization.

(C) The narrator is a student and has interacted with many students.

Incorrect. This strengthens the argument by suggesting that the narrator's conclusion is based on a larger sample.

(D) Social skills should not be expected of college students.

Incorrect. Whether social skills should be expected does not tell us whether these students actually possess them.

(E) The narrator was reluctant to stay at the college.

Incorrect. The narrator's desire to stay or leave does not address whether the students lack social skills.

Answer: (B)
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 01 Sep 2026
Posts: 16,631
Own Kudos:
81,116
 [1]
Given Kudos: 489
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,631
Kudos: 81,116
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mike1122
Can any of the experts have a look at this problem?
Can you please explain why C is not the correct answer. Also, if we assume that indeed B is the correct answer, why is the question assuming that the student couldn't have met 50k students in a week?

Thank you.

This is not a GMAT-type of question, but if we are looking for the "most suitable" answer, it would be (B).

Think of real world logic. It is highly unlikely that a fresher could have evaluated 50k population of a college in 1 week. But he still goes on to make a generalization about the entire student population - The student population is completely lacking in proper social skills.
So this is a flaw in his reasoning. There is a small chance that he could have observed the entire 50k crowd at a college concert and deduced what he did, but option (B) is the best, most logical option nevertheless.

Option (C) The narrator is a student and has interacted with many students.
It does not weaken the narrator's claim at all. If he is a student, he would have gotten the opportunity to observe other students' behavior up close. If he has interacted with "many" students, it improves his credibility. 'Many' simply means 'a lot'. He could have interacted with all also.


User avatar
egmat
User avatar
e-GMAT Representative
Joined: 02 Nov 2011
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 6,287
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 715
GMAT Date: 08-19-2020
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 6,287
Kudos: 33,890
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi mike1122,

You're asking two good questions. Let me take them one at a time, because they actually come from the same place.

First, remember what the conclusion is: "The student population is completely lacking in proper social skills" - a sweeping claim about everyone, based on one week of personal observation. That's the weak spot every answer should be measured against.

Why C doesn't weaken it

Choice C says the narrator is a student and has interacted with many students. Look at the direction this pushes: it makes the narrator's observations sound more informed, not less. If anything, it props the conclusion up. To weaken, you need something that makes "the whole population lacks social skills" less believable - and C does the opposite. That's why it's out.

The assumption you're questioning in B

Here's the key idea for CR: weakening doesn't mean disproving. You don't have to show the narrator definitely couldn't have met all 50,000 students. You only have to make the sweeping conclusion harder to justify - and B does exactly that. One person, one week, a population of 50,000: the sample the narrator actually saw is a tiny slice, so declaring the entire population deficient is unsupported.

Your "what if he met them all at a concert?" is the trap to watch. The stimulus never says that - you're importing a scenario the argument doesn't give you. In CR, judge only what's stated. What's stated is: one week, huge population. B uses only those facts to expose the overreach.

Quick gut check on "weaken":
- "This restaurant is terrible - the one dish I tried was cold."
- Which weakens it more: "the reviewer tried many dishes" (like C), or "the menu has 200 dishes" (like B)?

The second one instantly makes the sweeping judgment look shaky - without needing to prove the reviewer tried nothing else. Same move as B here.

Answer: B

mike1122
Can any of the experts have a look at this problem?
Can you please explain why C is not the correct answer. Also, if we assume that indeed B is the correct answer, why is the question assuming that the student couldn't have met 50k students in a week?

Thank you.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7399 posts
Verbal Forum Moderator
705 posts