V10-09

Question

Dietician: Many of my clients ask me whether a gluten-free diet has health benefits. It is true that people with Celiac disease can experience a variety of ailments from eating foods that contain gluten, and one client told me that  switching to gluten-free food resulted in him losing weight . However, only 1% of the population has Celiac disease, and the rest of the population does not experience any negative effects from gluten. Additionally, people on gluten-free diets often lose weight because they are eating fewer carbohydrates, not because of the absence of gluten.  For most people, a gluten-free diet has few health benefits . 
 
The portions of the passage marked in bold face play which of the following roles?

A. The first is the main conclusion of the dietician; the second is evidence to support that conclusion
B. The first is evidence used to support a position that the dietician questions; the second is the main conclusion of the dietician
C. The first is evidence used to support the dietician’s main conclusion; the second is that conclusion
D. The first is evidence used to support a position that the dietician questions; the second is evidence to support the dietician’s conclusion 
E. The first is an intermediate conclusion used to support the dietician’s main conclusion; the second is the main conclusion

bb · Answer

Official Solution:

Dietician: Many of my clients ask me whether a gluten-free diet has health benefits. It is true that people with Celiac disease can experience a variety of ailments from eating foods that contain gluten, and one client told me that  switching to gluten-free food resulted in him losing weight . However, only 1% of the population has Celiac disease, and the rest of the population does not experience any negative effects from gluten. Additionally, people on gluten-free diets often lose weight because they are eating fewer carbohydrates, not because of the absence of gluten.  For most people, a gluten-free diet has few health benefits . 
 
The portions of the passage marked in bold face play which of the following roles?

A. The first is the main conclusion of the dietician; the second is evidence to support that conclusion
B. The first is evidence used to support a position that the dietician questions; the second is the main conclusion of the dietician
C. The first is evidence used to support the dietician’s main conclusion; the second is that conclusion
D. The first is evidence used to support a position that the dietician questions; the second is evidence to support the dietician’s conclusion 
E. The first is an intermediate conclusion used to support the dietician’s main conclusion; the second is the main conclusion

(A) The first boldfaced portion is evidence used by a patient to suggest that a gluten-free diet has health benefits. The second answer choice is the dietician’s main conclusion.
 
(B)  Correct . The first boldfaced portion is evidence used by a patient to suggest that a gluten-free diet has health benefits. The second answer choice is the dietician’s main conclusion - the premise for this conclusion is "1% of the population has Celiac disease, and the rest of the population does not experience any negative effects from gluten".
 
(C) The first boldfaced portion is evidence used by a patient to suggest that a gluten-free diet has health benefits. The second answer choice is the dietician’s main conclusion.
 
(D) The first boldfaced portion is evidence used by a patient to suggest that a gluten-free diet has health benefits. The second answer choice is the dietician’s main conclusion.
 
(E) The first boldfaced portion is evidence used by a patient to suggest that a gluten-free diet has health benefits. The second answer choice is the dietician’s main conclusion.

Answer: B

felippemed · Answer

The explanation shown is simply a repitition. An explanation of WHY this part is a conclusion would be more useful  bb  
Best,

Felippe

sayantanc2k · Answer

The main conclusion of an argument depends on the understanding of the logic chain - consider the following:
Good boys study hard and John is a good boy. John studies hard.

How would you answer this query: " Why  John studies hard  is the conclusion?". At the most you may point out the premise.

I have included the premise in the explanation.

RatneshS · Answer

The first part of bold face is never a support that questions dietician..in fact dietician supports that gluten helps in losing weight. Please recheck the options

lolcatz · Answer

Here we are assuming losing weight is a health benefit. Why? Diets are intended for either for the purpose of losing weight or gaining weight. I feel part A can support the conclusion if we view the effect of losing weight as a negative. This problem is ambiguous.

chaudhurysr · Answer

sayantanc2k ,

The first boldface may be an evidence used by a patient, but the fact is ... it IS supporting the dietician's main conclusion "a gluten-free diet has few health benefits". Although losing weight could be seen as a health benefit or health loss depending upon an individual's perception, but the very next line says that 99% of the population did not experience any negative effects. This indicates that the dietician sees the 1st boldface as a positive effect/health benefit.

So nowhere it appears that the 1st boldface supports a position that is questioned by the dietician. So, B doesn't seem to be the correct answer.

IMO C is the correct answer. Main conclusion is "a gluten-free diet has few health benefits", and the 1st boldface is supporting it.

Let me know if you still feel otherwise.

vyascd · Answer

chetan2u

Please explain why option C is wrong.
also what is exactly the difference between option C and option B

chetan2u · Answer

I think, since you are between B and C, you agree that the second part is the main conclusion.
Both choices B and C correctly claim the part to be evidence. BUt what role is it playing towards the main conclusion..
Conclusion says that 'a gluten-free diet has few health benefits', and first part says 'switching to gluten-free food resulted in him losing weight'..
The dietician thereafter attributes the losing of weight to lesser carbs than the gluten free diet as such. Thus he NEGATES the first part to support his conclusion. This means the first part was supposed to weaken the conclusion.
B talks of evidence to be supporting opposite of the dietitians stand, while C talks of evidence to be supporting  opposite of  the dietitians stand.
So B is correct

Geetshri · Answer

I think this is a high-quality question and I agree with explanation. (A) The first boldfaced portion is evidence used by a patient to suggest that a gluten-free diet has health benefits. "The second answer choice is the dietician’s main conclusion."

The second line in this statement is misleading

The second line in this statement is misleading

bumpbot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club BumpBot: 

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

 This post was generated automatically.

V10-09

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards