Thank you for your solution.
I have a quick doubt - Please can you explain if it okay to have the equation of the line in the form y=k/x+0. I understand that the value of x (in any line y=mx+b) can be an integer or fraction but to have x coordinate in the denominator does not align with the slope equation. In the slope intercept form x is multiplied with the slope and not divided. Hence, is it not different to form a line that has a fractional value of x from having a line that has the x cooridnate in the denominator?
In simpler terms is it okay to have a slope equation of the form that is being made here?
I am not sure if there's conceptual gap in my understanding? Please can
mike GMATNinja ian KarishmaB marty scott anyone help explain this to me?[/quote]
I think you're under the impression that xy = k is the equation of a line, which is not accurate. In fact, xy = k, where k ≠ 0, results in a hyperbola. For instance, see this graph of xy = -10:

To solve this question, you don't really need all of this. Having xy equal to a negative number means that when x is positive, y is negative. Therefore, in this case, all points are in the IV quadrant. Conversely, when x is negative, y is positive. Thus, in this case, all points are in the II quadrant.
Answer: D.
Attachment:
desmos-graph (2).png
[/quote]
Thanks
Bunuel this makes sense. I got a little confused with the solution above. This clarifies my doubt as to why the equation in this question is not that of a line and actually forms a parabola. Hence, will not be of the form y=mx+b.
Just an add on question - Can you confirm if there can be a case/possibility to have an equation (in which the x coordinate is in the denominator) similar to the one that is formed in this question?