Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 03:54 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 03:54
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
VyshakhR1995
Joined: 02 Mar 2017
Last visit: 28 Jul 2019
Posts: 227
Own Kudos:
765
 [56]
Given Kudos: 30
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Posts: 227
Kudos: 765
 [56]
5
Kudos
Add Kudos
48
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Ashy Boy
Joined: 11 Apr 2017
Last visit: 25 Jun 2024
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
17
 [3]
Given Kudos: 19
Status:800 and more!
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 620 Q47 V29
GPA: 3.75
Products:
GMAT 1: 620 Q47 V29
Posts: 11
Kudos: 17
 [3]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
VyshakhR1995
Joined: 02 Mar 2017
Last visit: 28 Jul 2019
Posts: 227
Own Kudos:
765
 [1]
Given Kudos: 30
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Posts: 227
Kudos: 765
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Ashy Boy
Joined: 11 Apr 2017
Last visit: 25 Jun 2024
Posts: 11
Own Kudos:
17
 [1]
Given Kudos: 19
Status:800 and more!
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT 1: 620 Q47 V29
GPA: 3.75
Products:
GMAT 1: 620 Q47 V29
Posts: 11
Kudos: 17
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VyshakhR1995
Ashy Boy
Why is it not E? whats the explanation for A?


The conclusion is that companies without a competitive advantage will not
be able to retain an increase in market share

They will lose the market share
as they raise their prices back to original levels.

What if they decide not to increase the prices.... The author assumes that they
aren’t willing to continue with lower profit margins...
A dismisses this case -----Answer


Companies that can develop competitive advantages are irrelevant to
the conclusion....Hence E is wrong..
Hope its clear
yes thank you so much. I thought in some other way. I get it now the point is clear. Thanks once again.
User avatar
BS55
Joined: 20 Jan 2016
Last visit: 05 Apr 2018
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
GMAT 1: 600 Q49 V23
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V30
Products:
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V30
Posts: 17
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VyshakhR1995
Ashy Boy
Why is it not E? whats the explanation for A?


The conclusion is that companies without a competitive advantage will not
be able to retain an increase in market share

They will lose the market share
as they raise their prices back to original levels.

What if they decide not to increase the prices.... The author assumes that they
aren’t willing to continue with lower profit margins...
A dismisses this case -----Answer


Companies that can develop competitive advantages are irrelevant to
the conclusion....Hence E is wrong..
Hope its clear


Hi
Thank you Vyshakh. Above explanation was helpful but as per my understanding in order for the conclusion to hold true , shouldn't the assumption state otherwise . See below.

"Few companies lacking competitive advantages
in costs of production that have
increased their market share will NOT sustain
price margins lower than those of firms with
production cost advantages.

Thanks
User avatar
VyshakhR1995
Joined: 02 Mar 2017
Last visit: 28 Jul 2019
Posts: 227
Own Kudos:
765
 [1]
Given Kudos: 30
Location: India
Concentration: Finance, Marketing
Posts: 227
Kudos: 765
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
BS55
VyshakhR1995
Ashy Boy
Why is it not E? whats the explanation for A?


The conclusion is that companies without a competitive advantage will not
be able to retain an increase in market share

They will lose the market share
as they raise their prices back to original levels.

What if they decide not to increase the prices.... The author assumes that they
aren’t willing to continue with lower profit margins...
A dismisses this case -----Answer


Companies that can develop competitive advantages are irrelevant to
the conclusion....Hence E is wrong..
Hope its clear


Hi
Thank you Vyshakh. Above explanation was helpful but as per my understanding in order for the conclusion to hold true , shouldn't the assumption state otherwise . See below.

"Few companies lacking competitive advantages
in costs of production that have
increased their market share will NOT sustain
price margins lower than those of firms with
production cost advantages.

Thanks


Hey BS55,

For the argument to hold MOST companies should NOT sustain price margins.
If they Do sustain price margin-----Price will not raise back to original level
A states only few companies sustain---->MOST companies will not
Hope its clear
User avatar
BS55
Joined: 20 Jan 2016
Last visit: 05 Apr 2018
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
GMAT 1: 600 Q49 V23
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V30
Products:
GMAT 2: 660 Q50 V30
Posts: 17
Kudos: 4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hey BS55,

For the argument to hold MOST companies should NOT sustain price margins.
If they Do sustain price margin-----Price will not raise back to original level
A states only few companies sustain---->MOST companies will not
Hope its clear[/quote]


This is what i was missing.Thanks Vyshakh

Regards
User avatar
rish2708
Joined: 12 Jul 2017
Last visit: 15 Sep 2022
Posts: 173
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 442
Location: India
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
GMAT 1: 570 Q43 V26
GMAT 2: 690 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.8
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
GMAT 2: 690 Q50 V32
Posts: 173
Kudos: 244
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
VyshakhR1995
Companies that dominate an industry usually do so
by developing a competitive advantage, often control
of a unique resource or a superior technology, that
allows them to manufacture products at a lower cost
than their competitors can. Nondominant companies
that seek to increase their share of the market
generally must endure drastically lower profit margins
as they win customers away from the dominant
companies by matching their prices. Companies that
increase their market share in this way and do not
change their disadvantage in production costs relative
to those of the dominant companies will, therefore,
eventually lose their recently won market share as
prices return to normal levels.

Which of the following is an assumption upon which
the conclusion of the argument depends?

Few companies lacking competitive advantages
in costs of production that have
increased their market share will sustain
price margins lower than those of firms with
production cost advantages.

Dominant companies generally cannot maintain
their competitive advantage over long
periods of time unless they acquire additional
unique resources or develop improved
technology.

Nondominant companies can improve their
competitive positions by developing unique
resources or technological innovations
similar to those of dominant companies.

A dominant company with a competitive
advantage generally will not lower its prices
to undercut those of a firm that lacks competitive
advantages in production costs.

Acquiring unique resources or developing
superior technology is a difficult undertaking
that requires substantial investment on the
part of a company seeking to gain a competitive
advantage in production costs.

Why not option D ?

It says that the competitive once will not keep the costs lower. If it does , doesn't the whole argument of prices falling back to normal levels will fail?

Please shed some light.

Regards
Rishav

Posted from my mobile device
avatar
arorni
Joined: 27 Oct 2017
Last visit: 08 Oct 2020
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
20
 [1]
Given Kudos: 69
Posts: 55
Kudos: 20
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rish2708
VyshakhR1995
Companies that dominate an industry usually do so
by developing a competitive advantage, often control
of a unique resource or a superior technology, that
allows them to manufacture products at a lower cost
than their competitors can. Nondominant companies
that seek to increase their share of the market
generally must endure drastically lower profit margins
as they win customers away from the dominant
companies by matching their prices. Companies that
increase their market share in this way and do not
change their disadvantage in production costs relative
to those of the dominant companies will, therefore,
eventually lose their recently won market share as
prices return to normal levels.

Which of the following is an assumption upon which
the conclusion of the argument depends?

Few companies lacking competitive advantages
in costs of production that have
increased their market share will sustain
price margins lower than those of firms with
production cost advantages.

Dominant companies generally cannot maintain
their competitive advantage over long
periods of time unless they acquire additional
unique resources or develop improved
technology.

Nondominant companies can improve their
competitive positions by developing unique
resources or technological innovations
similar to those of dominant companies.

A dominant company with a competitive
advantage generally will not lower its prices
to undercut those of a firm that lacks competitive
advantages in production costs.

Acquiring unique resources or developing
superior technology is a difficult undertaking
that requires substantial investment on the
part of a company seeking to gain a competitive
advantage in production costs.

Why not option D ?

It says that the competitive once will not keep the costs lower. If it does , doesn't the whole argument of prices falling back to normal levels will fail?

Please shed some light.

Regards
Rishav

Posted from my mobile device

Hi Rishav,

Even I did the same mistake, I opted for D first. But later realized that argument is discussing about the noncompetitive company which has already used that strategy and gained market share. It will not be able to retain the same, if price increase. so the only answer choice goes with that is A.

I hope that helps.

Regards
Nidhi
User avatar
rish2708
Joined: 12 Jul 2017
Last visit: 15 Sep 2022
Posts: 173
Own Kudos:
244
 [1]
Given Kudos: 442
Location: India
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
GMAT 1: 570 Q43 V26
GMAT 2: 690 Q50 V32
GPA: 3.8
Schools: ISB '21 (A)
GMAT 2: 690 Q50 V32
Posts: 173
Kudos: 244
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
arorni
rish2708
VyshakhR1995
Companies that dominate an industry usually do so
by developing a competitive advantage, often control
of a unique resource or a superior technology, that
allows them to manufacture products at a lower cost
than their competitors can. Nondominant companies
that seek to increase their share of the market
generally must endure drastically lower profit margins
as they win customers away from the dominant
companies by matching their prices. Companies that
increase their market share in this way and do not
change their disadvantage in production costs relative
to those of the dominant companies will, therefore,
eventually lose their recently won market share as
prices return to normal levels.

Which of the following is an assumption upon which
the conclusion of the argument depends?

Few companies lacking competitive advantages
in costs of production that have
increased their market share will sustain
price margins lower than those of firms with
production cost advantages.

Dominant companies generally cannot maintain
their competitive advantage over long
periods of time unless they acquire additional
unique resources or develop improved
technology.

Nondominant companies can improve their
competitive positions by developing unique
resources or technological innovations
similar to those of dominant companies.

A dominant company with a competitive
advantage generally will not lower its prices
to undercut those of a firm that lacks competitive
advantages in production costs.

Acquiring unique resources or developing
superior technology is a difficult undertaking
that requires substantial investment on the
part of a company seeking to gain a competitive
advantage in production costs.

Why not option D ?

It says that the competitive once will not keep the costs lower. If it does , doesn't the whole argument of prices falling back to normal levels will fail?

Please shed some light.

Regards
Rishav

Posted from my mobile device

Hi Rishav,

Even I did the same mistake, I opted for D first. But later realized that argument is discussing about the noncompetitive company which has already used that strategy and gained market share. It will not be able to retain the same, if price increase. so the only answer choice goes with that is A.

I hope that helps.

Regards
Nidhi


Thanks Nidhi. Your opinion coupled with my introspection helped me crack it.

Annotations:
P => Profit
R => Revenue
C => Costs

DC => Dominating companies
NDC => Non Dominating Companies.

As per my understanding now,
Pdc = Rdc - Cdc
Pndc = Rndc - Cndc

We know that Cdc < Cndc and Rdc must be equal to Rndc so that Ndc increase their market share

Now, statement says, if they( NDC) do not decrease their operating costs/manufacture costs their shares shall decrease when prices return to market levels.. meaning people won't buy


Now, in what scenario they shall sustain:
What if they keep up with low revenues ( sustain low profits i.e maintaining the equation Pndc < Pdc) then certainly their prices will be low.

And hence A shall be the answer. I get it .

And why Option D is wrong, as you said the lower price endurance has already been done by them. And the conclusions says that they shall not endure when the prices return to normal levels meaning back to earlier levels ( that is high)

So, yeah we can't take the possibility that the DC would lower its prices further.

Thanks for this small hint, as it helped me solve the problem and check where I was going wrong.

Regards,
Rishav
avatar
Pas4867
Joined: 27 Oct 2018
Last visit: 30 Jun 2019
Posts: 27
Own Kudos:
6
 [2]
Given Kudos: 1
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
GPA: 3.9
Products:
GMAT 1: 750 Q49 V42
Posts: 27
Kudos: 6
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A is the best answer. The conclusion here is that companies that do not have production advantages may be able to gain market share by accepting lower profit margins (matching their prices with those of the companies that do have production advantages) but they will lose that market share when they raise the prices to normal levels. This relies on the assumption that they will eventually raise their prices. A, very clearly states that few of the companies that lack production advantages can afford to function with lower profit margins, over time.
avatar
praveenjain
Joined: 17 Dec 2018
Last visit: 02 Mar 2020
Posts: 4
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 4
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
What is the meaning by " prices return to normal levels"
User avatar
pardhu1212
Joined: 24 Aug 2020
Last visit: 26 Dec 2021
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
14
 [1]
Given Kudos: 31
Location: India
Posts: 13
Kudos: 14
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Pas4867
A is the best answer. The conclusion here is that companies that do not have production advantages may be able to gain market share by accepting lower profit margins (matching their prices with those of the companies that do have production advantages) but they will lose that market share when they raise the prices to normal levels. This relies on the assumption that they will eventually raise their prices. A, very clearly states that few of the companies that lack production advantages can afford to function with lower profit margins, over time.

I understood this explanation. A few companies are able to survive even with lower margins when prices return to their normal levels. How is this an assumption for the conclusion? The conclusion states that these companies will lose market share. Shouldn't the assumption be "NO company lacking competitive advantages in costs of production that has increased their market share will sustain price margins lower than those of firms with production cost advantages."

Can you please explain?
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,431
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,431
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
504 posts
358 posts