Let me clarify both of your concernsWhy B is correct (even though "price" isn't mentioned):The key word in the conclusion is
"advisable" — this is a
recommendation, which inherently involves cost-benefit reasoning.
The passage tells us:
• Benefit: Prevents mass virus attacks ✓
• Compatibility: Not affected ✓
• Cost/Worth:
Not addressed ← This is the gap!
B fills this gap perfectly:"Correcting damage from virus is
more expensive than preventing it"
Translation:
Prevention is cheaper than cure → Therefore implementing variations IS advisable!
Important: In
Strengthen questions, correct answers
CAN and SHOULD bring in new information not mentioned in the passage. You're not limited to what's stated — you're looking for what makes the conclusion
more likely to be true.
Why D is wrong:D says: "Other destructive programs exist that don't depend on inter-computer links."
This is the
"Other Problems Exist" trap.
The argument recommends protection against
THIS specific threat (viruses spreading through linked systems). The existence of
OTHER threats doesn't make protection against
THIS threat less advisable.
Analogy: "Wear seatbelts to prevent crash injuries."
"But you can also get hurt by broken glass!"
Does this make seatbelts less advisable?
No!Key Takeaway:•
Strengthen questions = New supporting info is expected
•
Inference questions = Must be directly from passage
Don't confuse the two!
Answer: BAbhishekDhanraJ72
nowhere in paragraph it is mentioned about expensive/price. So how answer is B?. And how D is wrong?