Team captain: Winning requires the willingness to cooperate, which in turn requires motivation. So you will not win if you are not motivated.
The pattern of reasoning in which one of the following is most similar to that in the argument above?
(A) Being healthy requires exercise. But exercising involves risk of injury. So, paradoxically, anyone who wants to be healthy will not exercise. - WRONG. Exercise ----> Healthy. Exercise ----> Injury. nE ----> Healthy.
(B) Learning requires making some mistakes. And you must learn if you are to improve. So you will not make mistakes without there being a noticeable improvement. - WRONG. Mistakes ----> Learning ----> Improve. I ----> nM.
(C) Our political party will retain its status only if it raises more money. But raising more money requires increased campaigning. So our party will not retain its status unless it increases its campaigning. - CORRECT. Campaigning ----> Raising Money ----> Retain Status. nC ----> nRS.
(D) You can repair your own bicycle only if you are enthusiastic. And if you are enthusiastic, you will also have mechanical aptitude. So if you are not able to repair your own bicycle, you lack mechanical aptitude. - WRONG. Enthusiastic ----> Repair. Enthusiastic ----> Mechanical aptitude. nR ----> nMA or nMA ----> nR either can be true.
(E) Getting a ticket requires waiting in line. Waiting in line requires patience. So if you do not wait in line, you lack patience. - WRONG. Patience ----> Waiting ----> Ticket. Neither nW ----> nP nor nP ----> nW is true because the conclusion is made that way. It can go either way. Conclusion should have been about ticket.
Three aspect(also interrelated to each other) that make the passage are:
Motivation(M)----> Cooperation(C)----> Winning(W)
Note that conclusion is about Winning by considering the not case. If this comes naturally to you then good but robotically it like
M ----> W
But conclusion is
nM -----> nW
The flow of statements in all the choice are good but conclusion is where each lack EXCEPT C.
Answer C.