size=150]
OFFICIAL EXPLANATION[/size]
Project SC Butler: Sentence Correction (SC2)
THE PROMPTQuote:
Certain flea control methods can become ineffective if used repeatedly on an animal; one reason is suggested by evidence that fleas, like cockroaches, adapt to their environment and become increasingly immune to popular flea medicine with each generation.
• Meaning?
Repeated use of some flea control methods can create a situation in which failure is almost unavoidable, because evidence suggests that with each generation, fleas become more immune to the (anti-)flea medicine.
THE OPTIONSQuote:
A) Certain flea control methods can become ineffective if used repeatedly on an animal; one reason is suggested by evidence that fleas, like cockroaches, adapt to their environment and become increasingly immune to popular flea medicine with each generation.
• I see no issues
• "one reason" refers to the fact that certain flea control methods "can become ineffective if used repeatedly"
• not quite sure how to say this loudly and clearly: evidence can suggest a reason that something is happening.
I cannot figure out what is controversial about this idea.
Evidence THAT fleas adapt to environments suggests one reason that certain flea control methods can become effective if used repeatedly on an animal.
It is true that evidence itself cannot literally talk.
It is also true that at times GMAC does not like inanimate objects to have agency.
But as I have mentioned quite a few times now, there are many, many exceptions to this preference in standard written English.
These exceptions are idiomatic and this one is no different!
These three sentences are all
correct:→ A page in a chapter states, "Make sure that you vote early."
→ The poster said, "We will drive you to the single ballot drop-off box in the county. Call the number XXX-XXX-XXXX."
→
The sample suggested that if good COVID testing were available, more than one-third of the people in that state would test positive, whether they were pre-symptomatic, asymptomatic, or symptomatic.Quote:
B) If used repeatedly on an animal, one reason that certain flea control methods can become ineffective is suggested by evidence that fleas, like cockroaches, increasingly adapt to their environment and become more immune to popular flea medicine with each generation.
• the introductory phrase
If used repeatedly on an animal seems to be modifying/defining
one reason. That modification is ludicrous.
Quote:
C) If used repeatedly on an animal, one reason certain flea control methods can become ineffective is suggested by evidence that there are fleas, like cockroaches, that increasingly adapt to their environment and become more immune to popular flea medicine with each generation.
• same modifier problem as that in option B
• no reason exists to insert
there are into this sentence
→ at times, it is wise to insert
there are. This question is not one of those times.
→ contrary to popular belief, GMAC actually does have a few questions in which
there are is correct.
→ but in this case, there are just adds more words to an already long and somewhat confusing sentence
ELIMINATE C
Quote:
D) Certain flea control methods can become ineffective if they are used repeatedly on an animal; one reason, which derives from evidence, suggests that fleas, like cockroaches, adapt to their environment and become immune to increasingly popular flea medicine with each generation.
•
increasingly now modifies
popular flea medicine.→ why on earth would a flea medicine become "increasingly" more popular? And what does that fact, if true, have to do with the sentence?
→ this logic is at worst ridiculous and at best not nearly as sound as the logic in option A
•
it is okay to change the meaning of option A. It is not okay to create illogical meaning.ELIMINATE D
Quote:
E) The evidence that fleas, like cockroaches, adapt to their environment and become increasingly immune to popular flea medicine with each generation is suggestive of one reason, if used repeatedly on an animal, certain flea control methods can become ineffective.
• Because the sentence structure is so strained, I have no idea whether
if used repeatedly is supposed to modify
one reason.If so, that modification creates an unintelligible sentence.
"One reason" is not used repeatedly on an animal.• to create a logical sentence,
if used repeatedly on an animal should be placed after the word
ineffective• and how, exactly, is evidence of any sort "suggestive of" a
reason? To be
suggestive of is to be
evocative (of), to
cause you to think about something.
For evidence to suggest a reason is fine.
For evidence to be suggestive of a reason is not fine.
I could rant some more about this sentence, but we'll leave the rant there.
ELIMINATE E
The correct answer is A.• NOTESThe official question on which this question is partly based can be found by clicking
this link, here.
COMMENTSRamTee , welcome to SC Butler.
This question is based on an official one that makes good writers crazy. I've linked to that official question in "Notes."
(Once again: before you criticize any official SC question, write a good sentence correction question yourself. Doing so is incredibly difficult. I do not claim that GMAT SC sentences are elegant prose.)
EDIT: kudos to coherent explanations even if you made a bad assumption along the way.: Can you please explain how 'increasingly immune' is correct in option A?. If I understand correctly, immune is a noun and 'increasingly' is an adverb. Adverbs don't modify nouns. Please correct me if my understanding is wrong.