Hi
dattavarshaCongratulations on your massive success! Multiple admits in one of the most competitive admission cycles since 2008 is an achievement to be proud of, and I hope you're soaking in this feeling to its fullest.
I know you mentioned that you are location agnostic post-MBA, but a Tech PM goal would invariably lead you to the West Coast (and you'd want to be there too).
Of all your options, I would pick UCLA. Tepper would be second (but perhaps you aren't considering it, because of scholarship?) because they also have a strong placement record in Tech and CMU has a great reputation as a tech university. Cornell and Darden don't compare to UCLA or even Tepper's tech recruiting (if your goals were consulting, my recommendation would be Darden, UCLA, Tepper in that order) and you're having to pay sticker price at Darden, so that's a double whammy. Cornell edges Darden out a bit, because of the scholarship and proximity to the NYC tech scene.
Please keep in mind that tech recruiting is not as structured as consulting in most business schools, and would require a substantial amount of grunt work on your part.
Where I'm going with this is that while all three of these schools may have the Big Tech recruiters coming for on-campus recruitment, there are dozens of interesting tech companies that recruit MBAs off-campus. As such, you are required to network and create these opportunities, and it plays to your advantage if you can do so without having to fly in and out of your business school city to the West Coast. UCLA will place you bang in the middle of the LA tech scene and within a few hours of the Bay Area. Being able to have coffee chats with people at your target companies (hopefully things will go back to normal next year) vs fighting for the recruiters' attention during the campus networking 'circles of death' can make a world of difference as you try to find your dream job.
Regarding the method of study, Darden is heavily case-based, whereas UCLA and Cornell have a mix of case, lecture, and experiential learning. Again, specifically for Tech goals, you should look at "hands-on" resources and opportunities at all three schools. PMs are supposed to be problem-solvers, entrepreneurial, and team-players and if you have live projects and experiences to prove those skills (versus top grades in theoretical courses), that's always a bonus.
Hope this helps get you thinking about how to evaluate your options. You can read my post here about
how I made my choice between Anderson and Ross.
Are you planning to work on the Ross WL? I think that would be your best option (if they throw in the monies too).