Last visit was: 25 Apr 2026, 15:01 It is currently 25 Apr 2026, 15:01
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
sgpk242
Joined: 10 Feb 2024
Last visit: 26 Feb 2025
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
343
 [46]
Given Kudos: 32
Location: United States (MA)
GMAT Focus 1: 685 Q84 V86 DI82
GPA: 3.75
GMAT Focus 1: 685 Q84 V86 DI82
Posts: 13
Kudos: 343
 [46]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
44
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
MartyMurray
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,848
Own Kudos:
7,114
 [11]
Given Kudos: 213
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 1,848
Kudos: 7,114
 [11]
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,830
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,886
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,830
Kudos: 811,270
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
sgpk242
Joined: 10 Feb 2024
Last visit: 26 Feb 2025
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
343
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Location: United States (MA)
GMAT Focus 1: 685 Q84 V86 DI82
GPA: 3.75
GMAT Focus 1: 685 Q84 V86 DI82
Posts: 13
Kudos: 343
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel it's from the official GMAT Prep Focus Exams, but I'm not sure how to change tags now.
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,830
Own Kudos:
811,270
 [1]
Given Kudos: 105,886
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,830
Kudos: 811,270
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sgpk242
Bunuel it's from the official GMAT Prep Focus Exams, but I'm not sure how to change tags now.
________________________
Updated the tag. ­Thank you.
User avatar
8Harshitsharma
Joined: 25 Oct 2017
Last visit: 06 Jul 2025
Posts: 127
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 723
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q87 V80 DI80
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GRE 1: Q165 V160
GRE 2: Q170 V162
GPA: 9.25
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q87 V80 DI80
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GRE 1: Q165 V160
GRE 2: Q170 V162
Posts: 127
Kudos: 160
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
sgpk242
­Which of the following most logically completes the passage? 

Thick concrete walls insulate well and houses built with them cost less to heat and cool than wooden houses do. Researchers compared a wooden house with a concrete house that was otherwise identical in every significant way (sun exposure, size, heating and cooling system, etc.). Over a year, monthly energy costs averaged $55 less for the concrete house. In practice, most people choosing a concrete house over a wooden one would probably realize still greater monthly savings on energy, because ________. 

A - the houses in the survey were built in a region that has winters that are slightly cooler on average, and summers that are slightly warmer on average than is typical of most regions in the country

B - the heating and cooling systems in the houses in the survey were typical of those found in the average house in the area in which they were built 

C - the wood used in building the wooden house in the survey had high insulating properties created by an experimental treatment that is generally regarded as too expensive for residential construction

D - the energy efficiency of houses with concrete walls varies greatly depending on the thickness of the walls, with relatively thin concrete walls providing only slightly greater energy efficiency than well-built wooden walls

E - for the first forty years or so after they are built, maintenance costs for houses built with thick concrete walls tend to be lower than maintenance costs for comparable houses built with wooden walls ­
­A boy-o-boy wordy FIB question, all the modifiers are so important to understand this argument, and we can cut very little fluff during the analysis of this question.

Passage analysis:
Conclusion: The author claims that: in practice, people choosing a concrete house instead of a wooden house will probably have still greater savings than the $55 monthly savings claimed by the researchers.

Support for the conclusion: houses built with thick concrete walls cost less to heat and cool than wooden houses do. The concrete and wooden houses in the study were identical in every other significant way.

Initial thought after reading the FIB: We need to find a reason from the answer choices to back the author's conclusion, a strengthener.

Prethinking: How will the concrete house save more money in practice than it saved during the experiment ($55)?
Strengthener #1: a choice that somehow proves that concrete houses are, in practice, more efficient than the concrete houses in the researcher's experiment.
Strengthener #2: a choice that proves that wooden houses on average are less efficient than wooden houses in the experiment.

Keeping these 2 points in mind let's do answer choice analysis:

Choice A: This choice may seem attractive at first glance, but notice that the conditions claimed in this choice are true for both concrete houses and wooden houses, hence it doesn't provide us a contrast with the data in this choice. For instance, assume that in the experiment, concrete houses' energy bills on average comes to $200, and wooden houses' $255. So, if you are at most of the other places in the country, you can expect to see lesser dollar amount in bills than each respective type of house in the experiment. But will you see the margin between them "increase"?? Well now that would be an external assumption which is incorrect in the GMAT :) For another instance, the relationship between the margin (the $55 saving per month) and the net energy bill might be DIRECTLY proportional due to the material science properties of concrete and wood at extreme temperatures, so when you live in places with further extreme temperatures (cooler and hotter) from the average you can expect to see HIGHER savings. BUT, as you come to the cities with lesser deviation from the normal or average temperature, you will see your margin decreasing :( this would rather weaken the author's claim. INCORRECT CHOICE.

Choice C: By indicating that the insulation in wooden houses is usually worse than in the high-quality wooden houses in the experiment, we would back the author's claim that using concrete houses in practice will save people more than the $55 because the wooden houses in the experiment were of higher quality and consumed lesser energy than a typical wooden house, hence, deflating the savings in the experiment. Btw, this aligns too well with strengthener #2. CORRECT.

Choice D: This choice same as choice A, but in a more blunt way, assumes external info that the thickness of walls in the concrete houses on average is lesser than the concrete houses in the experiment. INCORRECT.

Hope this helps science guys looking for numeric explanations.­
User avatar
sayan640
Joined: 29 Oct 2015
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,118
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 789
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Products:
GMAT 1: 570 Q42 V28
Posts: 1,118
Kudos: 862
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MartyMurray , Requesting a more detailed explanation for option D and option A. Thank you in advance !!

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
siddd30
Joined: 02 Sep 2020
Last visit: 18 Jan 2025
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 27
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q87 V88 DI81
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 715 Q87 V88 DI81
Posts: 17
Kudos: 14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
MartyMurray
­Which of the following most logically completes the passage? 

Thick concrete walls insulate well and houses built with them cost less to heat and cool than wooden houses do. Researchers compared a wooden house with a concrete house that was otherwise identical in every significant way (sun exposure, size, heating and cooling system, etc.). Over a year, monthly energy costs averaged $55 less for the concrete house. In practice, most people choosing a concrete house over a wooden one would probably realize still greater monthly savings on energy, because ________.
 

The passage presents some comparative information about the cost of heating houses built with concrete walls and that of heating wooden houses.

It then states a conclusion:

In practice, most people choosing a concrete house over a wooden one would probably realize still greater monthly savings on energy

We can tell that that statement is a conclusion by noticing that it's followed by "because __________."

In this type of context, "because" is an evidence marker, and what follows "because" is a premise that supports the conclusion that precedes "because."

So, the choice that fills the blank must be a premise that supports the conclusion, "In practice, most people choosing a concrete house over a wooden one would probably realize still greater monthly savings on energy."

A - the houses in the survey were built in a region that has winters that are slightly cooler on average, and summers that are slightly warmer on average than is typical of most regions in the country

This choice provides support for the wrong conclusion.

The conclusion we need to support involves people saving on energy because of having a concrete house rather than a wooden house. On the other hand, this choice indicates that people would simply spend less on energy, on average, regardless of what type of house they have.

After all, if this choice is true, then, on average, people would likely spend less in winter and summer to heat and cool their houses respectively than was spent to heat and cool the houses in the survey. After all, given what this choice says, average outdoor temperatures are less extreme than the outdoor temperatures in the region where the houses in the survey were located, and it costs less to heat and cool a house when outdoor temperatures are less extreme.

At the same time, the differences in temperature mentioned by this choice would not cause people who have concrete houses to save more. Spending less because of less extreme outdoor temperatures is not the same as saving because of having a concrete house. In fact, being in a region where outdoor temperatures are less extreme would allow people who have wooden houses to spend less as well.

Eliminate.

B - the heating and cooling systems in the houses in the survey were typical of those found in the average house in the area in which they were built 

If antyhing, this choice casts doubt on, rather than supports the conclusion.

After all, if this choice is true, then the houses in the survey are similar to average houses. The fact that they are similar in this way indicates that the savings achieved by people in average houses would be about the same as, rather than greater than, the savings achieved in the case of the concrete house in the survey.

Eliminate.

C - the wood used in building the wooden house in the survey had high insulating properties created by an experimental treatment that is generally regarded as too expensive for residential construction

This choice is interesting.

If this choice is true, then the wooden house in the survey was better insulated than the average wooden house. Of course, in that case, having that concrete house rather than the wooden house in the survey resulted in less-than-average savings because the difference between the insulating properties of the concrete and the wood in those houses was less than average.

So, if this choice is true, the average person would save more than was saved in the case of the survey houses by having a concrete house rather than a wooden house because, normally, the difference between wood and concrete is greater.

So, this choice supports the conclusion.

Keep.

D - the energy efficiency of houses with concrete walls varies greatly depending on the thickness of the walls, with relatively thin concrete walls providing only slightly greater energy efficiency than well-built wooden walls

This choice would support the conclusion if the passage said that the concrete house in the survey had relatively thin walls. After all, in that case, people whose houses have average, rather than relatively thin, concrete walls would save even more by having concrete walls rather than wooden walls.

At the same time, the passage doesn't say that the house in the survey had relatively thin concrete walls. So, for all we know, it had average concrete walls. In that case, the fact that relatively thin concrete walls provide only slightly greater energy efficiency than wooden walls is irrelevant. After all, in that case, there's no reason to believe that the average house with concrete walls has thicker walls than the concrete house in the survey.

Eliminate.

E - for the first forty years or so after they are built, maintenance costs for houses built with thick concrete walls tend to be lower than maintenance costs for comparable houses built with wooden walls

The conclusion that the correct answer must support is about energy costs, not maintenance costs or total costs. So, because maintenance costs have no clear effect on energy costs, this information about maintenance costs has no bearing on the conclusion.

Eliminate.

Correct answer: C­
Hey marty,

Specifically on option A)
­If anything, the extreme weather conditions lead me to believe that the energy savings of 55$ are actually higher than anticipated, since the wooden houses would have spent more cooling and heating (making it a weakener). Let me know if my understanding is correct? Or are we strictly looking at the fact that, since the conditions would impact both the materials equally, the delta would remain the same­
User avatar
MartyMurray
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,848
Own Kudos:
7,114
 [1]
Given Kudos: 213
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 1,848
Kudos: 7,114
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
siddd30

MartyMurray
A - the houses in the survey were built in a region that has winters that are slightly cooler on average, and summers that are slightly warmer on average than is typical of most regions in the country

This choice provides support for the wrong conclusion.

The conclusion we need to support involves people saving on energy because of having a concrete house rather than a wooden house. On the other hand, this choice indicates that people would simply spend less on energy, on average, regardless of what type of house they have.

After all, if this choice is true, then, on average, people would likely spend less in winter and summer to heat and cool their houses respectively than was spent to heat and cool the houses in the survey. After all, given what this choice says, average outdoor temperatures are less extreme than the outdoor temperatures in the region where the houses in the survey were located, and it costs less to heat and cool a house when outdoor temperatures are less extreme.

At the same time, the differences in temperature mentioned by this choice would not cause people who have concrete houses to save more. Spending less because of less extreme outdoor temperatures is not the same as saving because of having a concrete house. In fact, being in a region where outdoor temperatures are less extreme would allow people who have wooden houses to spend less as well.

Eliminate.­
Hey marty,

Specifically on option A)
­If anything, the extreme weather conditions lead me to believe that the energy savings of 55$ are actually higher than anticipated, since the wooden houses would have spent more cooling and heating (making it a weakener). Let me know if my understanding is correct? Or are we strictly looking at the fact that, since the conditions would impact both the materials equally, the delta would remain the same
­Hi siddd30.

I think what you're saying is probably correct. It makes sense that the difference in energy use resulting from the differences in insulating properties would be increased by more extreme temperatures.

That reasoning probably goes beyond the scope of what the GMAT would require us to understand though. So, probably, there's no practical value to going further than reasoning that (A) doesn't provide a reason to believe that concrete will work better for most people.
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,441
Own Kudos:
79,413
 [1]
Given Kudos: 485
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,441
Kudos: 79,413
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
sgpk242
­Which of the following most logically completes the passage? 

Thick concrete walls insulate well and houses built with them cost less to heat and cool than wooden houses do. Researchers compared a wooden house with a concrete house that was otherwise identical in every significant way (sun exposure, size, heating and cooling system, etc.). Over a year, monthly energy costs averaged $55 less for the concrete house. In practice, most people choosing a concrete house over a wooden one would probably realize still greater monthly savings on energy, because ________. 

A - the houses in the survey were built in a region that has winters that are slightly cooler on average, and summers that are slightly warmer on average than is typical of most regions in the country

B - the heating and cooling systems in the houses in the survey were typical of those found in the average house in the area in which they were built 

C - the wood used in building the wooden house in the survey had high insulating properties created by an experimental treatment that is generally regarded as too expensive for residential construction

D - the energy efficiency of houses with concrete walls varies greatly depending on the thickness of the walls, with relatively thin concrete walls providing only slightly greater energy efficiency than well-built wooden walls

E - for the first forty years or so after they are built, maintenance costs for houses built with thick concrete walls tend to be lower than maintenance costs for comparable houses built with wooden walls ­
­
Premises:
Thick concrete walls insulate well and houses built with them cost less to heat and cool than wooden houses do.
Researchers compared a wooden house with a concrete house that was otherwise identical in every significant way.
Over a year, monthly energy costs averaged $55 less for the concrete house.

Conclusion: In practice, most people choosing a concrete house over a wooden one would probably realize still greater monthly savings on energy, because ___________

We are looking for another premise after 'because'. This premise would tell us why in real life people choosing a concrete house over a wooden one would realize even greater savings. So we need some data on why in real life (compared with the survey) will energy savings be even higher. The comparison here is between real life and study. 

A - the houses in the survey were built in a region that has winters that are slightly cooler on average, and summers that are slightly warmer on average than is typical of most regions in the country

The comparison is relevant so let's evaluate. The survey was conducted in regions where temperature extremes were higher. It means the heating and cooling systems of wooden houses in the survey had to work harder than they would have to in real life. Then in the survey, we would have seen higher bills than we would in real life. From this we can infer that in real life we will not get as much energy saving, which is quite opposite to what we wanted. Hence this option is incorrect.

In reality, cooling a house from 45 to 25 degree C uses more than twice the energy needed to cool a house from 35 to 25 degree Celsius. But even if you are not aware of this difference, you would at best think that more extreme temperature would not have any impact on the difference in the bills. 
Say for every 5 degree temp decrease, you need $100 of cooling energy.
If outside temperature is 40 degrees C, a wooden house would need $300 to come down to 25 degree C.
While if a concrete house is insulated and stays at 25 degree till the outside temperature is 35, it would need $100 (to come down from 40 degrees to 35 degrees)
A difference of $200.

But if outside temperature is 45 degrees C, a wooden house would need $400 to come down to 25 degree C.
While a concrete house would need $200.
In both cases the difference in the energy bill would be $200 only. 

So all in all, this option provides us no reason why in real life we will see a higher energy savings. We will either see a lower one or at best, the same. 

B - the heating and cooling systems in the houses in the survey were typical of those found in the average house in the area in which they were built 

Gives us no distinction between real life and survey.

C - the wood used in building the wooden house in the survey had high insulating properties created by an experimental treatment that is generally regarded as too expensive for residential construction

This tells us that in the survey, the wooden house had some insulating properties too (which are too expensive for real life wooden houses). Hence the energy bill wasn't as high as you would get in real life. This means that in real life, your energy bill in a wooden house would be even higher (for same temperature decrease say) and hence the energy savings by having a concrete house will be even higher. This is what we were looking for. 

D - the energy efficiency of houses with concrete walls varies greatly depending on the thickness of the walls, with relatively thin concrete walls providing only slightly greater energy efficiency than well-built wooden walls

We are not comparing efficiency of houses with different thickness of concrete walls. We are talking about thick concrete walls and that is it. We don't have any distinction between the thickness of survey conrete walls and real life concrete walls given to us. Irrelevant. 

E - for the first forty years or so after they are built, maintenance costs for houses built with thick concrete walls tend to be lower than maintenance costs for comparable houses built with wooden walls ­

Maintenance costs are irrelevant. We are only camparing energy costs. 

Answer (C)
User avatar
SergejK
Joined: 22 Mar 2024
Last visit: 02 May 2025
Posts: 152
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 74
Posts: 152
Kudos: 981
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
KarishmaB I feel like this question is missing the comparison part that can be found in all questions where 2 entities are compared – even if we only need to evaluate the belief in the argument. Most of the questions of that type would address the concrete houses in choice C by saying something along the lines that the concrete house was a standard build. This is a comparison question after all, right?­ And as such we shouldn't need an assumption that the concrete house is a standard build. Where did I go wrong?

I agree that other answer choices don't make sense. A is placing both houses in the same region, meaning not providing a potential for higher savings. B could be the needed information for the comparison but as it stands, the fact that heating and cooling systems are typical (for both?) does not help us to strengthen the argument. D actually provides a reason why C is not enough for comparison of the two as it presents information that there are different wall standards for concrete houses, however, is itself also not enough to strengthen the argument as it actually weakens it. And E is out of scope as it talks about maintenance costs but compared are monthly energy costs.

I know it is just a technicality, but would really like to know why this question doesn't use the comparison structure.­
User avatar
AditiDeokar
Joined: 12 Jan 2025
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 87
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 298
Location: India
Concentration: Finance
GMAT Focus 1: 525 Q77 V77 DI74
GPA: 3.5
GMAT Focus 1: 525 Q77 V77 DI74
Posts: 87
Kudos: 21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi Marty - I eliminated option A on the basis if teh fact that the conclusion says - In practice, most people choosing a concrete house over a wooden one would probably realize still greater monthly savings on energy, because ________. so it's talking about a case outside of the surveyed houses hence A would be irrelevant to us, since I'm concerned about energy saving for a broader range of concrete vs wooden houses, not on the basis what the surveyed houses are like

MartyMurray
­Which of the following most logically completes the passage?

Thick concrete walls insulate well and houses built with them cost less to heat and cool than wooden houses do. Researchers compared a wooden house with a concrete house that was otherwise identical in every significant way (sun exposure, size, heating and cooling system, etc.). Over a year, monthly energy costs averaged $55 less for the concrete house. In practice, most people choosing a concrete house over a wooden one would probably realize still greater monthly savings on energy, because ________.


The passage presents some comparative information about the cost of heating houses built with concrete walls and that of heating wooden houses.

It then states a conclusion:

In practice, most people choosing a concrete house over a wooden one would probably realize still greater monthly savings on energy

We can tell that that statement is a conclusion by noticing that it's followed by "because __________."

In this type of context, "because" is an evidence marker, and what follows "because" is a premise that supports the conclusion that precedes "because."

So, the choice that fills the blank must be a premise that supports the conclusion, "In practice, most people choosing a concrete house over a wooden one would probably realize still greater monthly savings on energy."

A - the houses in the survey were built in a region that has winters that are slightly cooler on average, and summers that are slightly warmer on average than is typical of most regions in the country

This choice provides support for the wrong conclusion.

The conclusion we need to support involves people saving on energy because of having a concrete house rather than a wooden house. On the other hand, this choice indicates that people would simply spend less on energy, on average, regardless of what type of house they have.

After all, if this choice is true, then, on average, people would likely spend less in winter and summer to heat and cool their houses respectively than was spent to heat and cool the houses in the survey. After all, given what this choice says, average outdoor temperatures are less extreme than the outdoor temperatures in the region where the houses in the survey were located, and it costs less to heat and cool a house when outdoor temperatures are less extreme.

At the same time, the differences in temperature mentioned by this choice would not cause people who have concrete houses to save more. Spending less because of less extreme outdoor temperatures is not the same as saving because of having a concrete house. In fact, being in a region where outdoor temperatures are less extreme would allow people who have wooden houses to spend less as well.

Eliminate.

B - the heating and cooling systems in the houses in the survey were typical of those found in the average house in the area in which they were built

If antyhing, this choice casts doubt on, rather than supports the conclusion.

After all, if this choice is true, then the houses in the survey are similar to average houses. The fact that they are similar in this way indicates that the savings achieved by people in average houses would be about the same as, rather than greater than, the savings achieved in the case of the concrete house in the survey.

Eliminate.

C - the wood used in building the wooden house in the survey had high insulating properties created by an experimental treatment that is generally regarded as too expensive for residential construction

This choice is interesting.

If this choice is true, then the wooden house in the survey was better insulated than the average wooden house. Of course, in that case, having that concrete house rather than the wooden house in the survey resulted in less-than-average savings because the difference between the insulating properties of the concrete and the wood in those houses was less than average.

So, if this choice is true, the average person would save more than was saved in the case of the survey houses by having a concrete house rather than a wooden house because, normally, the difference between wood and concrete is greater.

So, this choice supports the conclusion.

Keep.

D - the energy efficiency of houses with concrete walls varies greatly depending on the thickness of the walls, with relatively thin concrete walls providing only slightly greater energy efficiency than well-built wooden walls

This choice would support the conclusion if the passage said that the concrete house in the survey had relatively thin walls. After all, in that case, people whose houses have average, rather than relatively thin, concrete walls would save even more by having concrete walls rather than wooden walls.

At the same time, the passage doesn't say that the house in the survey had relatively thin concrete walls. So, for all we know, it had average concrete walls. In that case, the fact that relatively thin concrete walls provide only slightly greater energy efficiency than wooden walls is irrelevant. After all, in that case, there's no reason to believe that the average house with concrete walls has thicker walls than the concrete house in the survey.

Eliminate.

E - for the first forty years or so after they are built, maintenance costs for houses built with thick concrete walls tend to be lower than maintenance costs for comparable houses built with wooden walls

The conclusion that the correct answer must support is about energy costs, not maintenance costs or total costs. So, because maintenance costs have no clear effect on energy costs, this information about maintenance costs has no bearing on the conclusion.

Eliminate.

Correct answer:
User avatar
guddo
Joined: 25 May 2021
Last visit: 25 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,026
Own Kudos:
11,373
 [1]
Given Kudos: 32
Posts: 1,026
Kudos: 11,373
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AditiDeokar
Hi Marty - I eliminated option A on the basis if teh fact that the conclusion says - In practice, most people choosing a concrete house over a wooden one would probably realize still greater monthly savings on energy, because ________. so it's talking about a case outside of the surveyed houses hence A would be irrelevant to us, since I'm concerned about energy saving for a broader range of concrete vs wooden houses, not on the basis what the surveyed houses are like



Let me try to help. I think, you have precisely identified the flaw in option A so I'd say your reasoning is correct.

The passage's conclusion is about "most people" choosing between a typical concrete house and a typical wooden house. To justify greater savings for them, we need a reason why the wooden house in the study was atypically efficient, making the $55 savings understate the real-world difference.

Option A only discusses the regional climate where the study was conducted. Even if that region has more extreme temperatures, it affects both the concrete and wooden houses in the study equally. The $55 difference measured might still be the same relative difference one would find elsewhere. It does nothing to show that the wooden house in the study was better insulated than most, which is the necessary logical link.

Therefore, A is irrelevant to the needed comparison between the study's wooden house and a typical wooden house. Your elimination is correct.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
506 posts
361 posts