This is a classic problem that catches many students off guard. The trick here is recognizing that when people leave the company, you're not just changing the number of clerical workers—you're changing the
total number of employees too. Let me walk you through this.
Here's how to think about this step by step:Step 1: Find your starting pointYou've got 3,600 total employees, and 1/3 are clerical:
Clerical employees = \(\frac{1}{3} \times 3,600 = 1,200\) clerical workers
Step 2: Calculate the reduction in clerical staffNow the clerical staff gets reduced by 1/3. Notice this is 1/3 of the
clerical staff, not 1/3 of all employees:
Reduction = \(\frac{1}{3} \times 1,200 = 400\) employees leave
Remaining clerical = \(1,200 - 400 = 800\) clerical workers
Step 3: Here's the critical insight—adjust your total!This is where most students slip up. When 400 employees leave, the company's total headcount drops too:
New total employees = \(3,600 - 400 = 3,200\)
You can't use 3,600 anymore—that's the old total. This is what creates the trap answer!
Step 4: Calculate the final percentageNow you're ready to find what percentage of the
remaining workforce is clerical:
\(\text{Percentage} = \frac{800}{3,200} = \frac{1}{4} = 25\%\)
Answer: (A) 25%Watch out for this trap: If you incorrectly used 800/3,600 (forgetting to adjust the total), you'd get 22.2% and pick choice (B). That's exactly what the test-makers are hoping you'll do!
The takeaway: In percentage problems where something gets removed or reduced, always ask yourself: "Does my denominator need to change too?"
You can check out the
complete solution on Neuron by e-GMAT to learn the systematic framework for identifying and solving all "changing totals" problems. You'll also discover the common variations of this concept and how to spot them instantly. For comprehensive practice with detailed solutions to other official questions, explore
Neuron here.