I05-12

Question

The table shows the descriptive statistics of the food environment for five distinct types of restaurant consumers in the United States.
      Proximity Metrics   Restaurant non-consumers   Occasional Fast Food (FF)   Frequent Fast Food (FF)   Occasional Fast Food (FF) & Full Service (FS) Restaurants   Frequent Fast Food (FF) & Full Service (FS) Restaurants       # FF Restaurants within 0.5 mi   1.5   1.8   1.5   1.5   1.5       # FF Restaurants within 1 mi   4.8   6.3   4.6   5.3   5.3       # FS Restaurants within 0.5 mi   9.4   10.3   8.1   9.4   9.4       # FS Restaurants within 1 mi   26.8   30.5   24.2   30.1   30.1       # McDonald\'s within 0.5 mi   0.17   0.18   0.15   0.15   0.15       # McDonald\'s within 1 mi   0.45   0.58   0.45   0.55   0.55       Nearest Convenience Store (mi)   2.0   1.5   1.8   1.7   1.7       Nearest FF Restaurant (mi)   3.3   1.7   2.4   2.0   2.0       Nearest FS Restaurant (mi)   1.3   0.8   1.2   1.0   1.0       Nearest Grocery Store (mi)   2.4   1.5   2.2   1.7   1.7       Nearest Larger Grocery Store (mi)   5.4   4.5   4.6   4.5   4.5       Nearest McDonald\'s(mi)   5.4   2.7   3.6   3.1   3.1       Nearest Super Market(mi)   3.9   2.7   3.7   2.6   2.6       Nearest Super Store(mi)   4.2   2.5   3.2   2.7   2.7       Nearest Walmart(mi)   7.0   4.1   5.8   4.9   4.9

For each of the following statements, select  Supported  if the information in the table accurately supports the statement. Otherwise, select  Not   supported .

TetyanaRokobit · Answer

Official Solution:

For each fast food proximity metric less than or equal to 1 mile, the number of such restaurants within the proximity metric is higher for occasional fast food consumers rather than that number for frequent fast food consumers. For each proximity category, the number of restaurants increases at a greater distance as does the number of options for all categories of consumers. Therefore, it logically follows that the greater the distance, the lower the patronage. This is a reversal, as according to the table the nearest full service restaurant is likely to be twice as close to each category of customer as is the nearest fast food restaurant.

Correct answer:

The number of fast food restaurants within a mile of a person is more likely to encourage occasional patronage than to encourage frequent patronage.  "Supported"

Distance from all possible food sources is likely to lead to decreased restaurant patronage of all types.  "Supported"

For each type of restaurant customer listed, the nearest fast food restaurant is likely to be twice as close to the customer than is the nearest full service restaurant.  "Not supported"

Neetigya · Answer

I think this is a  poor-quality  question and the explanation isn't clear enough, please elaborate.

ShilpiAgnihotrii · Answer

I got 3 questions posted by TetyanaRokobit in the mock and all were poor quality question without proper explanation

DevanshiBhatt · Answer

I think this is a  poor-quality  question and the explanation isn't clear enough, please elaborate. Neither the question nor the answer has clarity

A. · Answer

Poor quality question. What does value mean; not mentioned clearly

pearrrrrrr · Answer

POOR  QUALITY QUESTION in GMATCLUB TEST

7seven7 · Answer

I gave 4 tests, all TA (Table Analysis) and 80% of graph questions are from TetyanaRokobit. They are not validated, "TetyanaRokobit" doesn't reply to any questions/posts regarding explanations. I have reported this atleast 4 times but nothing has happened. It just causes confidence loss while Giving mocks. I have started to ignore TA and GI question in mocks and focus only on getting DS questions right.

Exactly, questions are not being validated but are being added in Mocks which is affecting confidence. I have tried to complain but seems Bunuel/bb missed them.

Bunuel · Answer

This question was deactivated and removed from the database.

I05-12

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

Proximity Metrics	Restaurant non-consumers	Occasional Fast Food (FF)	Frequent Fast Food (FF)	Occasional Fast Food (FF) & Full Service (FS) Restaurants	Frequent Fast Food (FF) & Full Service (FS) Restaurants
# FF Restaurants within 0.5 mi	1.5	1.8	1.5	1.5	1.5
# FF Restaurants within 1 mi	4.8	6.3	4.6	5.3	5.3
# FS Restaurants within 0.5 mi	9.4	10.3	8.1	9.4	9.4
# FS Restaurants within 1 mi	26.8	30.5	24.2	30.1	30.1
# McDonald\'s within 0.5 mi	0.17	0.18	0.15	0.15	0.15
# McDonald\'s within 1 mi	0.45	0.58	0.45	0.55	0.55
Nearest Convenience Store (mi)	2.0	1.5	1.8	1.7	1.7
Nearest FF Restaurant (mi)	3.3	1.7	2.4	2.0	2.0
Nearest FS Restaurant (mi)	1.3	0.8	1.2	1.0	1.0
Nearest Grocery Store (mi)	2.4	1.5	2.2	1.7	1.7
Nearest Larger Grocery Store (mi)	5.4	4.5	4.6	4.5	4.5
Nearest McDonald\'s(mi)	5.4	2.7	3.6	3.1	3.1
Nearest Super Market(mi)	3.9	2.7	3.7	2.6	2.6
Nearest Super Store(mi)	4.2	2.5	3.2	2.7	2.7
Nearest Walmart(mi)	7.0	4.1	5.8	4.9	4.9

Supported	Not supported
		The number of fast food restaurants within a mile of a person is more likely to encourage occasional patronage than to encourage frequent patronage.
		Distance from all possible food sources is likely to lead to decreased restaurant patronage of all types.
		For each type of restaurant customer listed, the nearest fast food restaurant is likely to be twice as close to the customer than is the nearest full service restaurant.