This critical reasoning question requires identifying an assumption, which is an unstated premise that must be true for the argument to hold.
The argument states:
1. The company implemented mandatory health check-ins to reduce absenteeism.
2. Mandatory check-ins could lead to feelings of being monitored.
3. Such feelings might decrease job satisfaction, which could prevent absenteeism rates from improving.
The conclusion is that the health check-ins might not reduce absenteeism as intended.
An assumption connects evidence (monitoring decreases job satisfaction) to the conclusion (absenteeism might not improve). The missing link is that job satisfaction significantly affects absenteeism.
Answer Choices:
(A) The health check-ins have been fully implemented and are conducted regularly each morning.
This is irrelevant. The argument assumes the check-ins affect job satisfaction, not whether they are conducted regularly.
(B) Employees’ feelings of being monitored are not worse than any other feelings of dissatisfaction they may have due to other company policies.
This is irrelevant. It does not address whether job satisfaction influences absenteeism or link monitoring to absenteeism.
(C) The level of job satisfaction among employees is a significant factor influencing their rates of absenteeism.
This is correct. It directly links job satisfaction to absenteeism, bridging the gap in the argument. Without this assumption, the argument collapses.
(D) Before the health check-ins were implemented, no employees reported their health status voluntarily.
This is irrelevant. The argument focuses on the effects of mandatory check-ins on absenteeism, not on prior practices.
(E) Employees typically do not react negatively to other forms of monitoring or reporting that the company has implemented.
This is irrelevant. The argument already assumes employees react negatively to this specific policy, not others.
The correct answer is (C). The argument hinges on the assumption that job satisfaction significantly impacts absenteeism. Without this connection, the idea that decreased job satisfaction might negate the intended reduction in absenteeism wouldn’t make sense.