This looks a bit scary, but I'll try to explain it nonetheless.
First to understand what the stem is saying:
x is non-negative. This means it is 0 and above. It can be 0.00001 as well, or a gazillion if need be.
Also, x cannot be equal to 3*(root x) + 4.
Now, to get a sense of what this means, we take x to be 16, and then this comes out to be, 3*(root 16) + 4, that's 3*4 + 4 = 16. This cannot be the case. (I couldn't really find any others that can be the case here, so we can just take that x cannot be 16 but it can be literally any other number).
Now, I: (x - 1) (x - 16) is not equal to 0.
Here, substituting the 16, we immediately get (17 - 1) (16 - 16) = 16*0 = 0, which contradicts the statement and makes it untrue, but then again we cannot use x = 16, so we cannot consider this.
But we can take x = 1. Then we get (1 - 1) (1 - 16) or 0*(-15) = 0. Hence, I is not a must.
Now, II: |17 - x| is not equal to 1.
Again, places x = 16 here contradicts the statement, as 17 - 16 = 1, but note that if 17 - x can be (-1), as we're given the absolute value; so if we go for 17 - 18 = |(-1)| = 1, then that nullifies the statement as well. Hence, II is not a must.
Now, III:
We, we know that x is the square of an integer if we take x to be equal to 16. But we also know that we can take any other value of x that is not 16 and also the square of an integer, like 25, 36 or 49, then it is the square of an integer.
Hence, III is also not necessary. Also, for MAYBE THE THIRD TIME IN THIS SET OF 9 QUESTIONS, I have realized I went wrong while solving this. I can't seem to recall why I made these *brilliant* decisions, I'm guessing in this case because I know 16, which is the square of an integer, isn't the option, I somehow applied that to a 25, 36, etc., as well, when I even used those numbers to test the viability of the first two options. Anyway, good learning curve.
The answer is: E - None of the above.BunuelQuote: