If two sets are identical, their SD would be the same. In our case, SD of non-modulus set is greater, meaning that the numbers are 'further' away from each other. Given that the absolute values of a, b and c are fixed, the only variety from which this dicrepancy can come is if some of the values are below zero, therefore creating this extra 'distance' for higher SD.
Since the range is only 4, and for convenience saying that a<b<c, then the only possible 'border' integers for a set without a zero, that is also both positive and negative, are:
Now let's see which of the options can fit this allocation:
I. The median b=-2. Theoretically, it can fit the first arrangement: \(a=-3, b=-2, c=1.\) The mean will be -1.33, and for the 'positive' set {1,2,3} the mean will be 2. Surely enough, SD in the original set will be higher, since every element is further from the mean.
Possible.
II. Seems immediately wrong, except for the fact that
we can multiply 1 by 1 and by a prime. Since we can only have one +1 and one -1, then the 'prime' must be negative. In this case, the first arrangement fits again: \(a=-3, b=-1, c=1, abc=3.\) The 'positive' set will look like {1,1,3}, and SD will be calculated against the mean of 1.67, and the 'distances' will be {0.67; 0.67; 1.33}. For the original set {-3,-1,1}, with the average of -1, the dispersion will be higher judging by the variety: {2; 0; 2}. Therefore, this
could be true.III. If there's a mode, it means that there's a repeating number. Well, we can have both -1 and 1 in our set, just the same way as we've discussed above, under option II: {-3,-1,1}.
Possible.
Therefore,
the answer is E.