Last visit was: 20 Apr 2026, 22:41 It is currently 20 Apr 2026, 22:41
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,715
Own Kudos:
810,310
 [2]
Given Kudos: 105,795
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,715
Kudos: 810,310
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,715
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,795
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,715
Kudos: 810,310
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Archit3110
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 8,625
Own Kudos:
5,190
 [1]
Given Kudos: 243
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q79 V79 DI73
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy)
Products:
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
Posts: 8,625
Kudos: 5,190
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
SwethaReddyL
Joined: 28 Nov 2023
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 106
Own Kudos:
26
 [1]
Given Kudos: 266
Location: India
Products:
Posts: 106
Kudos: 26
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion - Widespread adoption of CBCDs would enhance overall financial stability

Option A - satisfaction with transaction doesn't guarantee adoption of CBCD - eliminate
Option B - may restrict? the option itself is speculative - eliminate
Option C - surveys doesn't mean that people will actually adopt, maybe they say this but when they come to know the procedure (long) of shifting, they might not - eliminate
Option D - private banks offering doesn't mean that people will not shift, it is a could be or could be not option - maybe a weak weakener we can say - if nothing else works maybe then we can pick it - hold
Option E - this is a weak weakener - countries where CBDC pilots have launched, citizens continue to hold in private banks

Final choice, Option E
Bunuel
Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) are being introduced as a way to strengthen financial systems by reducing dependence on private banks. Proponents argue that since CBDCs offer a risk-free place to hold funds directly with the government, individuals will shift deposits away from commercial banks, lowering the risk of bank runs during economic crises. Therefore, widespread adoption of CBDCs would enhance overall financial stability.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the reasoning in the argument above?

A. The majority of CBDC pilot users report satisfaction with transaction speed and digital convenience features.
B. Central banks may restrict CBDC account limits to avoid destabilizing commercial lending markets.
C. Surveys show that in regions with high trust in government institutions, public interest in CBDC adoption has been stronger.
D. Private banks have begun offering real-time payment systems and deposit insurance enhancements to retain their customer base.
E. In countries where CBDC pilots have been launched, many citizens have opted to use them for payments but continue to hold their savings in private banks.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more


User avatar
Natansha
Joined: 13 Jun 2019
Last visit: 11 Mar 2026
Posts: 195
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 84
Posts: 195
Kudos: 65
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A) Completely irrelevant, as we dont care what the reviews are for CBDC
B)Again irrelevant, it doesnt affect whether adopting CBDC will increase financial security or not
C)This strengthens slightly by saying that public would be interested in CBDC
E) What is true for other country may not necessarily be true for this one

D)Private banks are giving better insurance for the deposits, making them a better way to increase financial stability as well/people would want to retain their accounts, hence less opening of CBDCs

Ans D
User avatar
manan01
Joined: 18 Jan 2024
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
15
 [1]
Given Kudos: 63
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Entrepreneurship
GMAT Focus 1: 585 Q80 V79 DI78
GPA: 9.4
GMAT Focus 1: 585 Q80 V79 DI78
Posts: 36
Kudos: 15
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
E seems to be a even stronger weakener than B, which is vague as those limits can be very high/low compared to average users amount they keep in their bank acc. whereas E is more direct which shows that users still prefer to keep their savings in their bank acc despite the provided benefits (force of evidence weakened).
avatar
ManifestDreamMBA
Joined: 17 Sep 2024
Last visit: 21 Feb 2026
Posts: 1,387
Own Kudos:
897
 [1]
Given Kudos: 243
Posts: 1,387
Kudos: 897
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Flow of logic: Introduce CBDCs -> Individuals will shift deposits from commercial/private banks to govt -> lower risk of bank runs during economic crisis -> enhance overall financial stability

flaw would be if something breaks the above logical chain, which leads to non attainment of the goal

A - Strengthens, not a flaw
B - Provides a condition, still some amount will be moved and hence overall there will be a reduction
C - strengthens, not a flaw
D - this provides what banks are doing now, but it's not future proofing. Customers may still want to switch to govt. Also, even if not all customers switch but a few do, they will still lead to the goal of "enhancing" overall financial stability
E - this suggests people might not move the funds at the first place. This breaks the logic chain. correct
Bunuel
Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) are being introduced as a way to strengthen financial systems by reducing dependence on private banks. Proponents argue that since CBDCs offer a risk-free place to hold funds directly with the government, individuals will shift deposits away from commercial banks, lowering the risk of bank runs during economic crises. Therefore, widespread adoption of CBDCs would enhance overall financial stability.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the reasoning in the argument above?

A. The majority of CBDC pilot users report satisfaction with transaction speed and digital convenience features.
B. Central banks may restrict CBDC account limits to avoid destabilizing commercial lending markets.
C. Surveys show that in regions with high trust in government institutions, public interest in CBDC adoption has been stronger.
D. Private banks have begun offering real-time payment systems and deposit insurance enhancements to retain their customer base.
E. In countries where CBDC pilots have been launched, many citizens have opted to use them for payments but continue to hold their savings in private banks.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more


User avatar
vikramadityaa
Joined: 28 Jul 2025
Last visit: 23 Dec 2025
Posts: 55
Own Kudos:
41
 [1]
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 55
Kudos: 41
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) are being introduced as a way to strengthen financial systems by reducing dependence on private banks. Proponents argue that since CBDCs offer a risk-free place to hold funds directly with the government, individuals will shift deposits away from commercial banks, lowering the risk of bank runs during economic crises. Therefore, widespread adoption of CBDCs would enhance overall financial stability.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the reasoning in the argument above?

A. The majority of CBDC pilot users report satisfaction with transaction speed and digital convenience features.
B. Central banks may restrict CBDC account limits to avoid destabilizing commercial lending markets.
C. Surveys show that in regions with high trust in government institutions, public interest in CBDC adoption has been stronger.
D. Private banks have begun offering real-time payment systems and deposit insurance enhancements to retain their customer base.
E. In countries where CBDC pilots have been launched, many citizens have opted to use them for payments but continue to hold their savings in private banks.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more


Argument's key assumption: CBDCs will cause people to move their deposits away from commercial banks, and this shift will reduce bank-run risk, thereby improving financial stability.
To weaken, we need evidence that this shift in deposits does not actually happen, even when CBDCs are available.

Option A: Doesn't address whether deposits leave the bank.
Option B: This could weaken the effect, but it's indirect and speculative.
Option C: Supports adoption, not weakness.
Option D: Competitive response, but doesn't show CBDCs fail to reduce bank-run risks.
Option E: Directly contradicts the core mechanism of the argument. If deposits stay in the bank, bank-run risk is not reduced, so the conclusion collapses.

Hence, OPTION E.
User avatar
lkj123
Joined: 17 Jul 2025
Last visit: 06 Apr 2026
Posts: 33
Own Kudos:
19
 [1]
Posts: 33
Kudos: 19
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Option E, as user will not move away from the private institution resulting in lesser adoption of CBDC. hence, it will not strengthen the stability. all other option are strengthning the conclusion.
User avatar
Ayeka
Joined: 26 May 2024
Last visit: 18 Apr 2026
Posts: 528
Own Kudos:
402
 [1]
Given Kudos: 158
Location: India
Schools: ISB
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q82 V83 DI80
GPA: 4.2
Schools: ISB
GMAT Focus 1: 645 Q82 V83 DI80
Posts: 528
Kudos: 402
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The argument states that CBDCs enhance financial stability because individuals will shift their deposits away from private banks to the risk free central bank. For the conclusion to hold true, the public must make a shift where they will store their savings in the CBDC instead of private banks.
A. This is about user experience, not financial stability.......No
B. It states that Central bank are taking steptoavoid instability, but it restricts the account limits.....No
C. This only shows why people might adopt a CBDC account......No
D. This only describes a competitive response from the private banks.......No
E. In countries CBDC pilots have been launched. Many citizen have updated to use them for payments, but continue to hold their savings in the private banks.........IF people still keep their savings in private banks then claimed reduction in bank run risk doesnt happen. This weakens the argument......Answer

E
User avatar
forestmayank
Joined: 05 Nov 2025
Last visit: 31 Mar 2026
Posts: 103
Own Kudos:
87
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 103
Kudos: 87
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. Shows that users are satisfied with speed and convenience - Irrelevant
B. Central banks limiting access is hypothetical situation for a favorable system that central banks are themselves developing. hence no.
C. Higher trust = better adoption. This supports rather than weakening the argument. Hence no.
D. Private lenders offering better services to retain customers. This might affect decision of people to shift but direct impact on adoption of CBDC is not clearly described. Hence no.
E. Shows that even with the presence of CBDC, people keep their money in banks. Undermines the argument that people will keep their money when CBDC is introduced. Hence weaken the argument in favor of CBDCs.

Hence, Answer is Option E
User avatar
vasu1104
Joined: 10 Feb 2023
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 387
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 664
Location: Canada
Products:
Posts: 387
Kudos: 233
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
conclusion= widespread adoption would enhance overall financial stability.
reason- individual will shift deposit from commercial bank and that lowers the risk of bank runs during economic crisis.

A) it actually strengthen it
B) if there is limit then adoption wont be widespread. [perfect
C) this also strengthen it
D) but it doesnt guarantee retention
E) this is saying people are using both service. its neither strengthener nor solid weakner

B ans
Bunuel
Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) are being introduced as a way to strengthen financial systems by reducing dependence on private banks. Proponents argue that since CBDCs offer a risk-free place to hold funds directly with the government, individuals will shift deposits away from commercial banks, lowering the risk of bank runs during economic crises. Therefore, widespread adoption of CBDCs would enhance overall financial stability.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the reasoning in the argument above?

A. The majority of CBDC pilot users report satisfaction with transaction speed and digital convenience features.
B. Central banks may restrict CBDC account limits to avoid destabilizing commercial lending markets.
C. Surveys show that in regions with high trust in government institutions, public interest in CBDC adoption has been stronger.
D. Private banks have begun offering real-time payment systems and deposit insurance enhancements to retain their customer base.
E. In countries where CBDC pilots have been launched, many citizens have opted to use them for payments but continue to hold their savings in private banks.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more


User avatar
750rest
Joined: 27 Jul 2022
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 46
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,126
Concentration: Marketing, Operations
Products:
Posts: 46
Kudos: 34
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Conclusion is "Widespread adoption of CBDCs would enhance overall financial stability" hence option B as to avoid destabilization adoption is being restricted.
Bunuel
Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) are being introduced as a way to strengthen financial systems by reducing dependence on private banks. Proponents argue that since CBDCs offer a risk-free place to hold funds directly with the government, individuals will shift deposits away from commercial banks, lowering the risk of bank runs during economic crises. Therefore, widespread adoption of CBDCs would enhance overall financial stability.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the reasoning in the argument above?

A. The majority of CBDC pilot users report satisfaction with transaction speed and digital convenience features.
B. Central banks may restrict CBDC account limits to avoid destabilizing commercial lending markets.
C. Surveys show that in regions with high trust in government institutions, public interest in CBDC adoption has been stronger.
D. Private banks have begun offering real-time payment systems and deposit insurance enhancements to retain their customer base.
E. In countries where CBDC pilots have been launched, many citizens have opted to use them for payments but continue to hold their savings in private banks.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more


User avatar
AviNFC
Joined: 31 May 2023
Last visit: 10 Apr 2026
Posts: 306
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 306
Kudos: 366
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. The majority of CBDC pilot users report satisCBDCs.faction with transaction speed and digital convenience features. This somehow supports showing customer satisfaction & hence can indicate widespread adoption.
B. Central banks may restrict CBDC account limits to avoid destabilizing commercial lending markets. Correct. The commercial banks can get destabilized leading to financial destabilization. Further, if accounts get limited, widespread adoption would not be possible.
C. Surveys show that in regions with high trust in government institutions, public interest in CBDC adoption has been stronger. These again supports showing the belief in govt. system among individuals.
D. Private banks have begun offering real-time payment systems and deposit insurance enhancements to retain their customer base. The proposal still holds given the risk free deposit in
E. In countries where CBDC pilots have been launched, many citizens have opted to use them for payments but continue to hold their savings in private banks. This some how weakens showing that people of other countries have not opted to these banks for deposits. however, condition of this country can be different & widespread adoption of these banks may be beneficial.

Ans B
User avatar
harishg
Joined: 18 Dec 2018
Last visit: 09 Apr 2026
Posts: 176
Own Kudos:
174
 [1]
Given Kudos: 31
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q88 V84 DI81
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 695 Q88 V84 DI81
Posts: 176
Kudos: 174
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A- this would only strengthen the argument. Customers are more likely to shift to CBDCs

B - This would also partially strengthen the argument as financial stability is emphasised in the action of the central bank. Customer’s reaction to the same cannot be gauged in this scenario

C - this is also a strengthener as high trust will make CBDC successful

D - Private banks may have lucrative offers, but still customers might not be swayed due to risk being lower with CBDCs

E - this is our weakener. It mentions that both are operating in unison and therefore, one may not replace the other. It is enough to create a doubt as to whether cbdc will be able to entirely pull customers away from bank deposits.

Therefore, Option E
User avatar
sitrem
Joined: 19 Nov 2025
Last visit: 24 Feb 2026
Posts: 91
Own Kudos:
84
 [1]
Given Kudos: 238
Posts: 91
Kudos: 84
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
E

A. incorrect. Weather do not use us as satisfied with the speed of the bank doesn't improve whether or not they will move their savings out of the commercial banks where they currently have their savings.
B. incorrect. This is not a certainty, so this doesn't clearly show that the argument is wrong.
C. Incorrect. Interest in CBDCs doesn't improve the reduce bank run risks.
D. incorrect. like A, this doesn't show whether or not people will move their savings (which is the element that can reduce ban run risks).
E. correct. If people keep their savings in commercial banks, CBDCs will NOT reduce bank run risks.
User avatar
MANASH94
Joined: 25 Jun 2025
Last visit: 11 Apr 2026
Posts: 88
Own Kudos:
63
 [1]
Given Kudos: 16
Location: India
Schools: IIM IIM ISB
GPA: 2.9
Schools: IIM IIM ISB
Posts: 88
Kudos: 63
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The argument’s key assumption is that people will move their deposits (savings) from commercial banks into CBDCs, and that this shift will reduce bank-run risk and improve financial stability.
To undermine the reasoning, we would need an option showing that this deposit shift does not actually happen, even when CBDCs are available.
Lets evaluate the choices :
A. Satisfaction with speed/convenience Seems Irrelevant to whether people move savings out of banks. (Incorrect)
B. CBDC account limits This infact weakens somewhat, but indirectly. Limits could still allow meaningful shifts. (Incorrect)
C. Higher trust → more interest This Supports adoption, not a weakening. (Incorrect)
D. Banks improving services Competitive response, but does not show CBDCs fail to reduce bank-run risk. (Incorrect)
E. People use CBDCs for payments but keep their savings in private banks
Seems to directly attacks the core assumption. (Correct)

If savings remain in banks deposits are not reduced, bank-run risk is not generally lowered, the conclusion that CBDCs enhance financial stability breaks down.

Hence for me the answer is E.
Bunuel
Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) are being introduced as a way to strengthen financial systems by reducing dependence on private banks. Proponents argue that since CBDCs offer a risk-free place to hold funds directly with the government, individuals will shift deposits away from commercial banks, lowering the risk of bank runs during economic crises. Therefore, widespread adoption of CBDCs would enhance overall financial stability.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the reasoning in the argument above?

A. The majority of CBDC pilot users report satisfaction with transaction speed and digital convenience features.
B. Central banks may restrict CBDC account limits to avoid destabilizing commercial lending markets.
C. Surveys show that in regions with high trust in government institutions, public interest in CBDC adoption has been stronger.
D. Private banks have begun offering real-time payment systems and deposit insurance enhancements to retain their customer base.
E. In countries where CBDC pilots have been launched, many citizens have opted to use them for payments but continue to hold their savings in private banks.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more


User avatar
AditiDeokar
Joined: 12 Jan 2025
Last visit: 12 Apr 2026
Posts: 87
Own Kudos:
21
 [1]
Given Kudos: 298
Location: India
Concentration: Finance
GMAT Focus 1: 525 Q77 V77 DI74
GPA: 3.5
GMAT Focus 1: 525 Q77 V77 DI74
Posts: 87
Kudos: 21
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The correct answer is Choice E. Option B vs Option E. The conclusion relies on the fact that individuals will shift deposits. E breaks thats link, while option B simply is a what-if situation where Central Banks MAY restrict the amount ot be transferred to CBDC.
User avatar
obedear
Joined: 05 Sep 2024
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 61
Own Kudos:
39
 [1]
Given Kudos: 11
Products:
Posts: 61
Kudos: 39
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I selected E.

We are looking for an answer choice that undermines the reasoning for the argument that adoption of CBDCs will enhance overall financial stability. The reasoning given in the argument is related to increased deposits in these accounts lowering dependence on banks to hold money. The correct answer will sever this link.

A - If the majority of CBDC pilot users are satisfied with the service, this doesn't really affect financial stability if the program is adopted.
B - If account limits are restricted, then people can hold less in the CBDC accounts and more would remain in the banks, which does somewhat undermine the reasoning. However, it is not clear if the limits are strict enough to affect the amounts held within deposits within commercial banks; it seems like this actually strengthens the argument because regulations are being put in place to avoid destabilization.
C - Public interest may signal that the program if introduced has a higher likelihood of widespread use, but it does not attack the argument for financial stability.
D - This describes an effort from the commercial banks to retain their customer base, but it does not disprove the idea that CBDCs could enhance financial stability.
E - If we have evidence that in countries where this program has been adopted, the CBDCs are not even being used to hold deposits, then it des nothing to support the argument that CBDCs will lower risk of bank runs because everyone's money will still be held within the commercial / private banks.
User avatar
Dereno
Joined: 22 May 2020
Last visit: 20 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,398
Own Kudos:
1,372
 [1]
Given Kudos: 425
Products:
Posts: 1,398
Kudos: 1,372
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) are being introduced as a way to strengthen financial systems by reducing dependence on private banks. Proponents argue that since CBDCs offer a risk-free place to hold funds directly with the government, individuals will shift deposits away from commercial banks, lowering the risk of bank runs during economic crises. Therefore, widespread adoption of CBDCs would enhance overall financial stability.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the reasoning in the argument above?

A. The majority of CBDC pilot users report satisfaction with transaction speed and digital convenience features.
B. Central banks may restrict CBDC account limits to avoid destabilizing commercial lending markets.
C. Surveys show that in regions with high trust in government institutions, public interest in CBDC adoption has been stronger.
D. Private banks have begun offering real-time payment systems and deposit insurance enhancements to retain their customer base.
E. In countries where CBDC pilots have been launched, many citizens have opted to use them for payments but continue to hold their savings in private banks.

Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more


The passage is about CBDCs introduction to strengthen Financial system, and reduce dependency on private banks.

Why is the there a need to reduce the dependence of private banks ? Why CBDCs? How does it help ?

So, the proponents argue that CBDCs help to park funds with the government banks , which are risk free - risk during economic crisis is zero. The money is much safer compared to private commercial banks, which are more risky during economic crisis.

So, if more people shift toward CBDCs, the overall financial stability will be enhanced.

We need to find an option which undermines the reasoning:

A) This is actually a strengthening statement, if the pilot CBDCs are satisfactory, convenient as well as with a good transaction speed. Then people opting to switch from private to government banks happens with ease. Hence, wrong.

B) This option mentions putting a restrictive cap on the CBDCs account limits by the central bank, in doing so, the transfer of funds from private to government banks is slowed, not stopped. Moreover, it contradicts the earlier view, that more funds moving to government will result in financial stability. But, the option speaks about destabilising private lending markets. Hence, wrong.

C) This is also a strengthening statement, as it mentions the trend shifting in favour of government banks. Thus, adding value to the CBDCs. Hence, wrong.

D) This option is a knee jerk reaction to the implementation of CBDCs. To ensure the retention rate of customers and to prevent the possible shift from happening, option D mentions the possible pacifying agents used - deposit insurance enhancements, real time payment systems etc. Hence, Wrong.

E) This paints a favourable global picture, by highlighting the outcome of Pilot CBDCs , and the response of the public in retaining cash with the private funds. Not panicking or rushing to park funds with the government. This option neutralises the single threat element - risk completely, thereby the financial stability is not compromised. Thus, weakening the CBDCs. Hence, correct answer.

Option E .
 1   2   3   
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
494 posts
358 posts