Bunuel
Central bank digital currencies (CBDCs) are being introduced as a way to strengthen financial systems by reducing dependence on private banks. Proponents argue that since CBDCs offer a risk-free place to hold funds directly with the government, individuals will shift deposits away from commercial banks, lowering the risk of bank runs during economic crises. Therefore, widespread adoption of CBDCs would enhance overall financial stability.Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the reasoning in the argument above?A. The majority of CBDC pilot users report satisfaction with transaction speed and digital convenience features.B. Central banks may restrict CBDC account limits to avoid destabilizing commercial lending markets.C. Surveys show that in regions with high trust in government institutions, public interest in CBDC adoption has been stronger.D. Private banks have begun offering real-time payment systems and deposit insurance enhancements to retain their customer base.E. In countries where CBDC pilots have been launched, many citizens have opted to use them for payments but continue to hold their savings in private banks.
Gift
12 Days of Christmas Competition
This question is part of our holiday event
Win $40,000 in prizes: courses, tests, and more
The passage is about CBDCs introduction to strengthen Financial system, and reduce dependency on private banks.
Why is the there a need to reduce the dependence of private banks ? Why CBDCs? How does it help ?
So, the proponents argue that CBDCs help to park funds with the government banks , which are risk free - risk during economic crisis is zero. The money is much safer compared to private commercial banks, which are more risky during economic crisis.
So, if more people shift toward CBDCs, the overall financial stability will be enhanced.
We need to find an option which undermines the reasoning:
A) This is actually a strengthening statement, if the pilot CBDCs are satisfactory, convenient as well as with a good transaction speed. Then people opting to switch from private to government banks happens with ease. Hence, wrong.
B) This option mentions putting a restrictive cap on the CBDCs account limits by the central bank, in doing so, the transfer of funds from private to government banks is slowed, not stopped. Moreover, it contradicts the earlier view, that more funds moving to government will result in financial stability. But, the option speaks about destabilising private lending markets. Hence, wrong.
C) This is also a strengthening statement, as it mentions the trend shifting in favour of government banks. Thus, adding value to the CBDCs. Hence, wrong.
D) This option is a knee jerk reaction to the implementation of CBDCs. To ensure the retention rate of customers and to prevent the possible shift from happening, option D mentions the possible pacifying agents used - deposit insurance enhancements, real time payment systems etc. Hence, Wrong.
E) This paints a favourable global picture, by highlighting the outcome of Pilot CBDCs , and the response of the public in retaining cash with the private funds. Not panicking or rushing to park funds with the government. This option neutralises the single threat element -
risk completely, thereby the financial stability is not compromised. Thus, weakening the CBDCs. Hence, correct answer.
Option E .