We have three groups, planning (P), reception (R), and materials (M). Their probabilities add up to 1:
P + R + M = 1 The question asks: Is Re greater than 5/8 (which is 0.625)?
Statement (1): P(not materials) is less than 45%.
If someone is not in materials, they must be in either planning or reception. This statement tells us:
P + R < 0.45
Since P is a probability, it is at least 0. This means R must be even smaller than the combined total:
R < 0.45
And 0.45 is well below 0.625. So we can confidently say: R is not greater than 5/8. That’s a clear, definite answer: "No."
So
Statement (1) is sufficient.
Statement (2): P(not reception) is greater than 40%.
If someone is not in reception, they are in planning or materials. This tells us:
1 - R > 0.40
Rearranging that:
R < 0.60
Once again, 0.60 is comfortably below 0.625. So we also get a clean, definite "No". Re is not greater than 5/8.
Therefore,
Statement (2) is also sufficient on its own.
Putting it together:
Both statements, completely independently, allow us to answer the question with certainty (the answer being "No" in both cases). Since each one stands alone without needing the other, the answer is:
D — Each statement alone is sufficient. The trap here is that both statements feel incomplete because they give inequalities instead of exact numbers, but that's all you need. The question is a yes/no question, not a "find the value" question. Once you can rule out R > 5/8 with certainty, you're finished, even if you don’t know R's exact value.