Events & Promotions
| Last visit was: 02 Sep 2026, 09:31 |
It is currently 02 Sep 2026, 09:31 |
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 0208:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Sep 0301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Aug 2710:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
We’ve worked incredibly hard to build TTP into the best test prep experience possible, and it would mean a lot to us to win Newsweek’s 2026 Readers’ Choice Award for Best Test Prep. If TTP has helped you, we’d be incredibly grateful for your vote.
Sep 0212:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
Thought your job leaves no time for GMAT prep? After multiple GMAT attempts and a demanding consulting job, Kshitij improved to 695 in under 2 months. Learn the mindset shifts, study strategy, and execution changes that made the breakthrough possible.
Sep 0410:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
What does test anxiety really look like on the GMAT? For many test takers, it does not look like a panic attack. Instead, it shows up as brain fog, rereading, negative comparisons, mental noise....
Sep 0609:30 AM EDT
-12:30 PM EST
Top scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful EA course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Perfect class schedule and easy course access for working professionals. Class starts Sundays Sept. 6, 2026.- Sep 07
12:01 AM PDT
-11:59 PM PDT
On the 7th, GMAT Club Tests will be Free! Including all the Quizzes, Questions, and Tests. 12 AM - 11:59 PM PDT - Sep 09
07:00 AM PDT
-10:00 AM PDT
Meet AdComs and explore top Master’s programs - MiM, MiF, MSc, MSBA and more. - Application Fee Waivers - Free 1-Week of GMAT Club Tests: - Master's Application Toolkit - Grand Prize Giveaway 
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2108:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
08 Jul 2026, 20:45
Kudos
Bookmarks
Option D is correct as the new metric shared is increase in congestion clearance by 25% on all major intersections.
It is possible that the intersection might have only some peak busy hours like School time, and office people commute like 810 am in teh morning and similarly between 4-6 pm the congestion is more but in the remaining day its mostly empty.
and the original concern was to reduce the time spent at the red light by 20% and it is still possible that during this peak congestion time of the day the time spent is even more at the red light or might have stayed the same.
SO we are not looking at comparison for the same metric before and after the installation of the new system.
The remaining options a, b c and e discuss about irrelevant outcomes/ options
It is possible that the intersection might have only some peak busy hours like School time, and office people commute like 810 am in teh morning and similarly between 4-6 pm the congestion is more but in the remaining day its mostly empty.
and the original concern was to reduce the time spent at the red light by 20% and it is still possible that during this peak congestion time of the day the time spent is even more at the red light or might have stayed the same.
SO we are not looking at comparison for the same metric before and after the installation of the new system.
The remaining options a, b c and e discuss about irrelevant outcomes/ options
rungtamehul
Joined: 03 Aug 2025
Last visit: 15 Aug 2026
Posts: 26
Given Kudos: 195
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
Schools: ISB HEC Sept '27 INSEAD Aug '27
GMAT Focus 1: 705 Q88 V85 DI82 
GPA: 7.8
08 Jul 2026, 23:25
Kudos
Bookmarks
The conclusion of the argument is that the new system will ensure city meets its 20% traffic congestion target in the downtown core.
The main premise is that the new system will increase the traffic flow from major intersections by 25%
Now lets eliminate the options
Option A: Timeline is not in question, the argument never talks about it. Out of Scope. Eliminate
Option B: Even if it malfunctions during the initial implementation phase. It can correct after that and reduce congestion to the required amount. Eliminate
Option C: If raising the intersection capacity increase the number of cars passing through the downtown. Then the 25% metric wont hold as increased traffic flow will increase the congestion. Keep this one
Option D: Older traffic system is irrelevant in this case. Even if, lets say, that older system is more efficient than the current one (Which contradicts the argument's evidence too). It is not relevant as the conclusion is only about reducing the flow by 20%. Eliminate
Option E: Even if it costs $1 trillion, the conclusion is not about cost justification, but about reducing congestion. Irrelevant. Eliminate
From elimination, we get the answer as C
The main premise is that the new system will increase the traffic flow from major intersections by 25%
Now lets eliminate the options
Option A: Timeline is not in question, the argument never talks about it. Out of Scope. Eliminate
Option B: Even if it malfunctions during the initial implementation phase. It can correct after that and reduce congestion to the required amount. Eliminate
Option C: If raising the intersection capacity increase the number of cars passing through the downtown. Then the 25% metric wont hold as increased traffic flow will increase the congestion. Keep this one
Option D: Older traffic system is irrelevant in this case. Even if, lets say, that older system is more efficient than the current one (Which contradicts the argument's evidence too). It is not relevant as the conclusion is only about reducing the flow by 20%. Eliminate
Option E: Even if it costs $1 trillion, the conclusion is not about cost justification, but about reducing congestion. Irrelevant. Eliminate
From elimination, we get the answer as C
Bunuel
08 Jul 2026, 23:37
Kudos
Bookmarks
I got options c as an answered
--- Conclusion -- "the Installation of .... target"
---- The gap If better traffic flow attracts more people to drive Downtown the extract Demand cancels the throughput completely
---- Option A talks about timeline it's not a logical flaw ,,, Option B talks about mechanicals law it's not really to make the thing flaw It's more of a real world concern ,, Option D is compared with old system so yeah it's kind of irrelevant ,, And for option E it talks about cost and financial thing which is not related to the conclusion the conclusion is about congestion
---- And regarding option C I choose option C because Properly states that the Better traffic flow won't encourage people to drive more That's why it fails apart and yeah attacks conclusion properly !!
--- If anyone has any better reasoning or answer feel free to tag or share
--- Conclusion -- "the Installation of .... target"
---- The gap If better traffic flow attracts more people to drive Downtown the extract Demand cancels the throughput completely
---- Option A talks about timeline it's not a logical flaw ,,, Option B talks about mechanicals law it's not really to make the thing flaw It's more of a real world concern ,, Option D is compared with old system so yeah it's kind of irrelevant ,, And for option E it talks about cost and financial thing which is not related to the conclusion the conclusion is about congestion
---- And regarding option C I choose option C because Properly states that the Better traffic flow won't encourage people to drive more That's why it fails apart and yeah attacks conclusion properly !!
--- If anyone has any better reasoning or answer feel free to tag or share
