algae covers large section of coral reefs.
algae is used by fish as surface to lay and protect their eggs.
researchers want to test that notion. so they selected 20 coral reefs. out of 20, they removed algae from 10 and kept algae in other 10.
for the next few weeks they monitored the egg laying across all these 20 sections.
they found that reefs with no algae had fewer fish eggs than other 10 undisturbed reefs.
conclusion= algae facilitates fish reproduction by providing site attachment and protection.
there is big monumental jump from reasoning to conclusion. just because there were fewer eggs on disturbed reefs they made conclusion that these sites dont promotes fish reproduction process.
A then why were they so hesitant in doing so.? had they done it, we wouldnt have this que at hand. out.
B this tells that the reason for not having enough eggs on disturbed site was surface abrasion and not about not having algae. in that case it just attack the reasoning of researchers. keep.
C if undisturbed area provides the protection, then it make sense to lay more eggs over there. but how does it facilitate reproduction process, god knows. out.
D it tells what are the parameters for reproduction facilitation but has no impact on the reasoning mentioned in passage. out.
E good to know that. but here we are not concerned about this problem. out.
choice B
Bunuel
Algae naturally covers large sections of coral reefs and is commonly used by several fish species as a surface on which to lay and protect their eggs. To test whether algae coverage affects where and how successfully fish lay eggs, researchers selected 20 reef sections and scraped all algae from half of them, leaving the remaining sections undisturbed. They then monitored egg-laying across all sections over the following weeks. The sections from which algae had been removed had significantly fewer intact fish eggs than the undisturbed sections, leading the researchers to conclude that algae facilitates fish reproduction by providing attachment sites and protective covering for eggs.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the researchers' reasoning?
(A) Fish in the study area preferentially lay their eggs on bare reef surfaces rather than on algae-covered areas.
(B) Scraping algae from reef surfaces causes abrasion damage to the underlying substrate that reduces its suitability as an egg-laying site.
(C) In the undisturbed sections, algae provides physical protection for fish eggs against predators and strong currents.
(D) The proportion of eggs that successfully hatch is a more accurate indicator of reproductive success than the number of eggs that survive to hatching.
(E) If left unchecked, algae growth can eventually overgrow reef sections to the point where it reduces oxygen availability for fish populations.
⚠️ Important: GMAT Club does not allow AI-generated posts. AI-generated solutions are not eligible for kudos, and users who post them may face moderation action, including a ban.