Last visit was: 02 Sep 2026, 19:49 It is currently 02 Sep 2026, 19:49
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,061
Own Kudos:
838,712
 [7]
Given Kudos: 111,271
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,061
Kudos: 838,712
 [7]
Kudos
Add Kudos
7
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 113,061
Own Kudos:
838,712
 [3]
Given Kudos: 111,271
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 113,061
Kudos: 838,712
 [3]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
Stam9
Joined: 06 May 2026
Last visit: 31 Aug 2026
Posts: 3
Own Kudos:
Posts: 3
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
feistygirl
Joined: 26 Apr 2026
Last visit: 06 Aug 2026
Posts: 60
Own Kudos:
54
 [1]
Posts: 60
Kudos: 54
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
i am going with option e
A- it fails as M could have arrived earlier than Z but rejected simply because he missed the luggage deadline
B- fails as no information about who boarded, who was rejected, when they arrived at gate.
C- fails as they still allow 2 conflicting timelines making a definitive answer.
avatar
DachauerDon
Joined: 19 Apr 2025
Last visit: 16 Aug 2026
Posts: 88
Own Kudos:
71
 [1]
Given Kudos: 30
Location: Germany
Schools: LBS
Products:
Schools: LBS
Posts: 88
Kudos: 71
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Answer: E) neither

Statement (1):
Mateo either:
- didn't check in luggage before 15:00
- arrived at the gate after 15:30 and didn't check in online
- arrived at the gate after 15:50
There are too many scenarios where Mateo could've been later or earlier than Zahra -> NOT SUFFICIENT

Statement (2):
Mateo could be the person who checked in luggage on time, or he forgot to check in luggage on time but checked in online in time. There are multiple scenarios where Mateo could've been later or earlier than Zahra -> NOT SUFFICIENT

Both (1) and (2):
Using the scenarios from statement (1), Mateo could've forgotten to check in luggage in time but still checked himself in online on time, but we don't know when Zahra arrived at the gate. We don't need to do any more work as we've found a possible scenario where Zahra could've arrived earlier or later than Mateo.
User avatar
Maesha
Joined: 11 Jun 2026
Last visit: 31 Jul 2026
Posts: 29
Own Kudos:
25
 [1]
Given Kudos: 4
Concentration: Leadership, Economics
Schools: HBS '26 (S)
Schools: HBS '26 (S)
Posts: 29
Kudos: 25
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
1. The first statement denotes that zahra was allowed to board , so obviously she reached before 3.50 and if mateo was not allowed this means he reached after 3.50.so,mateo reached the gate later than zahra . hence , statement 1 is sufficient alone .


2. The 2nd statement states the timing of checking in , of the two people at 2.45 and before 3.30 respectively but doesn't state specifically who checked in online and who did it at 2.45 pm , so statement 2 is not sufficient alone .


Statement 1 is sufficient alone to answer the asked ques , but statement 2 is not sufficient alone.
User avatar
paragw
Joined: 17 May 2024
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 370
Own Kudos:
376
 [1]
Given Kudos: 62
Posts: 370
Kudos: 376
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Statement 1:
Z boarded, M didn't
Case 1:
M = 3:55 and Z = 3:25
Yes
Case 2:
M = 3:35 (No online check-in)
and Z = 3:45 (with online check-in)
No
Not Sufficient

Statement 2:
We've no info about gate arrival time
Not sufficient

Statement 1 + 2:
M: No luggage, no online check in, reached at 3:35, Not allowed
Z: Luggage at 2:45, reached at 3:45 with online check in, allowed
M came earlier

M: no luggage, reached at 3:51 with online check in, not allowed
Z: Luggage at 2:45, reached at 3:25, allowed
M came later

Therefore, Not sufficient
Hence, E
User avatar
Archit3110
User avatar
Major Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2017
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 8,809
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 243
Status:You learn more from failure than from success.
Location: India
Concentration: Sustainability, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1: 545 Q79 V79 DI73
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
GPA: 4
WE:Marketing (Energy)
GMAT Focus 2: 645 Q83 V82 DI81
Posts: 8,809
Kudos: 5,330
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
To board the Tokyo flight, any passenger with luggage to check must check that luggage at least 60 minutes before the 4:00 PM flight departure. Additionally, any passenger arriving at the gate after 3:30 PM must have checked in online before 3:30 PM. No passenger is allowed to board if they arrive after the gate closes at 3:50 PM. If Mateo and Zahra reached the gate at different times, did Mateo reach the gate later than Zahra?

(1) Zahra was allowed to board but Mateo was not.

(2) Only one of the travelers needed to check luggage, doing so at 2:45 PM, and only one of them checked in online before 3:30 PM.


the given condition

any passenger with luggage must check luggage <=60 mins before 4PM flight departure

arriving at gate after 3:30 PM must have checked in online before 3:30 pm

no passenger is allowed to board after gate closes at 3:50

target

Mateo & Zahra reached gate at different times, did Mateo reach the gate later than Zahra

#1
Zahra was allowed to board but Mateo was not .
sufficient to say that yes Mateo arrived at gate after 3:50
sufficient
#2
one passenger check in at 2:45 i.e. before 3 PM which is 60 mins before 4PM flight departure and one of them checked in before 3:30 pm
there is no info who did luggage check in and who did checked in before 3:30
insufficient information


OPTION A is correct
User avatar
Sanny7
Joined: 10 Apr 2026
Last visit: 19 Aug 2026
Posts: 52
Own Kudos:
45
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Products:
Posts: 52
Kudos: 45
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
S1 - Zahra (Z) was allowed and Mateo (M) was not
well, it can be either of the reasons for M, M could have not checked in online before 3.30 or M could have not checked in luggage before 3:00 or M could even have checked in in both luggage and have checked in online but could have reached for boarding after 3.50, so there are multiple reasons for M to be not allowed and different times of boarding that we are uncertain, also, we do not know when Z reached, it could be 3.49 too with check-ins too or could be before M
so, insufficient

S2 - it gives two specific times for two people but doesn't mention which time is for whom and so on.. so insufficient

C - S1+S2 = well to validate this, we know that one person checked in their luggage and did it on time i.e 2.45, and only one of them checked it online before 3.30
and if luggage reason was excluded for M, then M could have arrived after 3.30
case 1 - if Z was the one who checked in online and checked their luggage at 2.45, meaning the person in statement two is Z alone, and also suppose Z arrives at 3.40 and M arrives at 3.32, meaning M arrived before Z but was banned as he did not check in online which was required for M if they try to board after 3.30, in this case M arrived before Z
and Case 2 - Z arrives at 3.20, and M arrives at 3.55, again banned, but this time Z arrived before M
so in conclusive

answer would then be "E"
User avatar
Barsha5
Joined: 26 Jun 2022
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
53
 [1]
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 58
Kudos: 53
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
If you want to board at 4 pm, any checkin luggage must be checked in by 3. If you arrive later than 3:30, you must do an online checkin before 3:30. If you arrive later than 3:50 you are not allowed to board since gates are closed.

3 Conditions to board then.

Mateo and Zohra reached at different times. Did maeto reach later than zahra?

1) Z was allowed to board, M wasnt. Now could be M arrived later, could be he arrived earlier but didnt checkin luggage on time. Insufficient.

2) One of them checked in online before 3:30 and one of them checked in luggage by 2:45. We dont know who did what. Maybe M checked in at 3:30 but arrived late. Maybe he checked in luggage by 2:45, but didnt checkin online, Z reached later but had checked in so was allowed.

Combining also doesnt give us anything concrete.

E
User avatar
tannu.jha_0104
Joined: 07 Apr 2024
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 46
Own Kudos:
51
 [1]
Given Kudos: 69
Location: India
GMAT 1: 200 Q10 V10
GRE 1: Q135 V135
GMAT 1: 200 Q10 V10
GRE 1: Q135 V135
Posts: 46
Kudos: 51
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
stat 1 Zahra boarded , Mateo didn't
metro may be failed due to late gate or late online checkin
order unknown
not suff

now checking stat 2

one checjed lugguage at 2:45 (before 3)
one checked online before 3:30"
doesnot fix gate arrival order
not suff

both statement

possible
mateo later than zahra
Zahra later than mateo
both satisfy cond

not suff hence choosing e
User avatar
dhart
Joined: 02 Feb 2026
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 177
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 34
Posts: 177
Kudos: 86
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Stmt 1 : Zahra was allowed to board but Matteo was not

MAy be matteo arrived after gate closed at 3:50 pm. Sufficient

stmt 2 only one of them needed to check the lugage doing so at 2:45 pm , and another checked online before 3:30 pm, who did what and when they arrivedso diifcult to say zahra checked in before matteo or vice versa. Not sufficient
User avatar
prepapr
Joined: 06 Jan 2025
Last visit: 25 Aug 2026
Posts: 165
Own Kudos:
121
 [1]
Given Kudos: 71
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q84 V84 DI82
GPA: 8.9
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q84 V84 DI82
Posts: 165
Kudos: 121
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Given that
luggage check to be completed by 3pm
must have checked online if arrived after 3:30pm
cannot board after 3:50pm

Analysing statements
A)
If Mateo (not checked online) arrived at 3:35 and Zahra (checked in online) at 3:45, Zahra baords, Mateo do not. Here Mateo arrived early
If Mateo (not checked online) arrived at 3:40 and Zahra (checked in online) at 3:35, Zahra boards, Mateo do not. Here Zahra arrived early.
Insufficient

B)
We do not know who checked luggage and who checked online.
Insufficient

Combining statements
If M checked luggage and Z checked in online, M reached at 3:35 and Z reached 3:45,
Z allowed, M not allowed to board
M reached earlier than Z
If M checked in luggage, Z checked in online. M reached 3:40 , Z reached 3:15,
Z allowed, M not allowed
Z reached earlier than M
Still insufficient
E is the answer

Bunuel
To board the Tokyo flight, any passenger with luggage to check must check that luggage at least 60 minutes before the 4:00 PM flight departure. Additionally, any passenger arriving at the gate after 3:30 PM must have checked in online before 3:30 PM. No passenger is allowed to board if they arrive after the gate closes at 3:50 PM. If Mateo and Zahra reached the gate at different times, did Mateo reach the gate later than Zahra?

(1) Zahra was allowed to board but Mateo was not.

(2) Only one of the travelers needed to check luggage, doing so at 2:45 PM, and only one of them checked in online before 3:30 PM.

 


This question was provided by Manhattan Prep
for the GMAT World Cup Competition

Win $30,000 in prizes: Courses, Tests & more

 


⚠️ Important: GMAT Club does not allow AI-generated posts. AI-generated solutions are not eligible for kudos, and users who post them may face moderation action, including a ban.
User avatar
RDM42
Joined: 20 Jan 2025
Last visit: 24 Aug 2026
Posts: 464
Own Kudos:
328
 [1]
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 464
Kudos: 328
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
To board the Tokyo flight, any passenger with luggage to check must check that luggage at least 60 minutes before the 4:00 PM flight departure. Additionally, any passenger arriving at the gate after 3:30 PM must have checked in online before 3:30 PM. No passenger is allowed to board if they arrive after the gate closes at 3:50 PM. If Mateo and Zahra reached the gate at different times, did Mateo reach the gate later than Zahra?

(1) Zahra was allowed to board but Mateo was not.
Mateo violated atleast 1 rule. But this doesn't tell us which rule is violated. So we can't know who arrived first at gate.
Insufficient
(2) Only one of the travelers needed to check luggage, doing so at 2:45 PM, and only one of them checked in online before 3:30 PM.
Maybe both things were completed by Zahra. Or maybe Mateo arrived before Zahra but failed to check in before 3:30.
Insufficient

(1)&(2) together
Since Zara boarded and Mateo did not. Then Mateo must be late because of gate arrival time or forgot to check in before 3:30.
If Zahra checked in online before 3:30 and reached gate 3:40. But Mateo arrived before zahra 3:31 but forgot check in, so denied entry.
Maybe Mateo check in before Zahra and did everything but arrived at boarding gate at 3:51. So denied entry.
Insufficient

E.
User avatar
onlyPlanA
Joined: 26 Jul 2024
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 139
Own Kudos:
46
 [1]
Given Kudos: 51
Posts: 139
Kudos: 46
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
IMO, answer is E. This is what I think about the response.

1st statement talks about how Zahra was allowed to board but Mateo was not. It could be possible that Mateo was not allowed to board due to some other reasons. No information can be inferred by this about who reached the gate first.

2nd statement says that both of them checked in their luggage early, but we don't know who reached the gate first. It could also be possible that they both reached the gate at the same time.

Taking two statements together, we still can't figure out who reached the gate first.

Bunuel
To board the Tokyo flight, any passenger with luggage to check must check that luggage at least 60 minutes before the 4:00 PM flight departure. Additionally, any passenger arriving at the gate after 3:30 PM must have checked in online before 3:30 PM. No passenger is allowed to board if they arrive after the gate closes at 3:50 PM. If Mateo and Zahra reached the gate at different times, did Mateo reach the gate later than Zahra?

(1) Zahra was allowed to board but Mateo was not.

(2) Only one of the travelers needed to check luggage, doing so at 2:45 PM, and only one of them checked in online before 3:30 PM.

 


This question was provided by Manhattan Prep
for the GMAT World Cup Competition

Win $30,000 in prizes: Courses, Tests & more

 


⚠️ Important: GMAT Club does not allow AI-generated posts. AI-generated solutions are not eligible for kudos, and users who post them may face moderation action, including a ban.
User avatar
harishj1996
Joined: 01 Jun 2026
Last visit: 01 Aug 2026
Posts: 38
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 5
Products:
Posts: 38
Kudos: 28
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The wordings of the question are very important here to resolve the question correctly. The keyword to board the Tokyo Flight, the following must have taken place:

1) Luggage Rule: To board the Flight, the luggage to be checked MUST be checked at least on or before 3:00PM
2) Check - In Rule: To board the Flight, for those arriving at the gate after 3:30PM, you MUST check in online prior to 3:30PM
3) Gate Closure Rule: No one will be allowed boarding if the time is past 3:50PM

Now take Statement 1: Zahra was allowed to board but Mateo was not

Here we can get two or three possibilities for why Zahra was allowed to board but Mateo was not:
i) Mateo needed to get his luggage checked prior to 3:00PM and did not
ii) Mateo did not check in online as required though he arrived at the gate post 3:30PM
iii) Mateo arrived at the Gate post 3:50PM

The question asks us to resolve whether Mateo arrived at the Gate later than Zahra. But just knowing that Mateo was not allowed to board is not sufficient. Mateo could have arrived at the Gate by 3:10 or 3:15PM, whereas Zahra arrived at 3:25PM, but he did not get his luggage checked prior as was required, and hence was denied boarding. This could be one possibility.

Else, Mateo did arrive later than Zahra and reached boarding gate at 3:55PM and hence was denied boarding. This is second possibility.

Since there are multiple possibilities, Statement 1 is insufficient.

Let's analyze Statement #2:

Only one needed to check luggage which was done at 2:45PM and only one of them checked-in online before 3:30PM. So while we have a condition that ONLY one needed to check luggage, so it could be (i) Zahra only or (ii) Mateo only.... the second condition is that only one of them checked in online which means EITHER ONE either Zahra or Mateo was the one. The difference is that it could be (i) Zahra and (ii) Zahra or Mateo or (i) Mateo and (ii) Either Zahra/Mateo.

But this doesn't tell us at what individual times they walked into the Gate and whether Zahra arrived earlier than Mateo conclusively. Hence Statement 2 by itself is also insufficient.

Combining Both Statements:

i) We know from Statement 2 that the one traveller that needed the luggage requirement met it at 2:45PM successfully. Therefore, luggage rule can be ruled out for any violation and only one of them needed it.

Thus possible reasons to be denied boarding and whether Zahra arrived earlier than Mateo are:
i) They did not check-in though were required to and denied boarding
ii) Arrival later than 3:50PM

Under condition 1 we know that Zahra was allowed boarding but Mateo was not. Hence Mateo was denied because he arrived later than 3:50PM.

Hence combining both statements, we get that neither is individually sufficient but both combined are sufficient. Hence C is the answer.
User avatar
roushanpandey65
Joined: 02 Jan 2026
Last visit: 01 Sep 2026
Posts: 42
Own Kudos:
11
 [1]
Given Kudos: 9
Location: India
GPA: 7.2
Products:
Posts: 42
Kudos: 11
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
both are not sufficient,
1st- it tell about the departure or allowance to the Gate entry but nothing about arrival.
maybe 1 person would have arrived early but was not able to checkin with time of 60min, other would have arrived a bit late but was able to checkin within time.

2nd: talks nothing about who arrived at what time.

combining also doesn't give us anything feasible.

hence E.
User avatar
heyaa
Joined: 19 Dec 2024
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 70
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 46
Location: India
Posts: 70
Kudos: 60
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Bunuel
To board the Tokyo flight, any passenger with luggage to check must check that luggage at least 60 minutes before the 4:00 PM flight departure. Additionally, any passenger arriving at the gate after 3:30 PM must have checked in online before 3:30 PM. No passenger is allowed to board if they arrive after the gate closes at 3:50 PM. If Mateo and Zahra reached the gate at different times, did Mateo reach the gate later than Zahra?

(1) Zahra was allowed to board but Mateo was not.

(2) Only one of the travelers needed to check luggage, doing so at 2:45 PM, and only one of them checked in online before 3:30 PM.

 


This question was provided by Manhattan Prep
for the GMAT World Cup Competition

Win $30,000 in prizes: Courses, Tests & more

 


⚠️ Important: GMAT Club does not allow AI-generated posts. AI-generated solutions are not eligible for kudos, and users who post them may face moderation action, including a ban.
imo it should be C.
the problem statement define the rules to board, and that M and Z reached the gate t different time.
now, S1: if Z arrived first(so she might have followed all the rules) or M arrived first(as there are 2 rules, it might be the case that M arrived first but still denied onboarding because he failed one rule like checking in online.
As we can't be certain therefore S1 is not sufficient.
S2: it says one did the luggage check in in time and other did the online checking in time but nothing more specific about who did what(and same was the main problem, nothing in specific) so it's not sufficient as well.
now, S1 and S2 together:
with 2 we know that both followed the check in rule and by s1 we know that M was denied onboarding while Z didn't. Therefore Z would have arrived the gate before M. so C.
User avatar
PJ8
Joined: 08 Jun 2026
Last visit: 30 Jul 2026
Posts: 21
Own Kudos:
13
 [1]
Given Kudos: 6
Posts: 21
Kudos: 13
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Let's check statement -1 ,

IF Zahra was allowed and Mateo was not.. There can be case where Zahra came just before 3:30 PM with online check in and Mateo came b/w 3-3:15 PM with offline luggage check in. so with this statement alone we can't be sure whether Mateo Reach the gate later than zahra.

Statement -2 - Also if take case of both passaenger as Zahra and Mateo, in no situation we can be sure whether Mateo reach later than Zahra.
Bunuel
To board the Tokyo flight, any passenger with luggage to check must check that luggage at least 60 minutes before the 4:00 PM flight departure. Additionally, any passenger arriving at the gate after 3:30 PM must have checked in online before 3:30 PM. No passenger is allowed to board if they arrive after the gate closes at 3:50 PM. If Mateo and Zahra reached the gate at different times, did Mateo reach the gate later than Zahra?

(1) Zahra was allowed to board but Mateo was not.

(2) Only one of the travelers needed to check luggage, doing so at 2:45 PM, and only one of them checked in online before 3:30 PM.

 


This question was provided by Manhattan Prep
for the GMAT World Cup Competition

Win $30,000 in prizes: Courses, Tests & more

 


⚠️ Important: GMAT Club does not allow AI-generated posts. AI-generated solutions are not eligible for kudos, and users who post them may face moderation action, including a ban.
User avatar
Arvind89
Joined: 02 Oct 2020
Last visit: 02 Sep 2026
Posts: 37
Own Kudos:
10
 [1]
Given Kudos: 55
WE:Other (Finance)
Posts: 37
Kudos: 10
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
St 1) Possible Cases. Case 1. Zara arrived at 3:25pm whereas Mateo arrived at 3:45pm without online chechin.
Case 2. Mateo arrived at 3:35 without doing online checkin while zara arrived at 3:45 having done online checkin before 3:30.
Hence ST 1 is insufficient.
St2) Just give general info. Doesnot give specific information reagrding each. Insufficient.

Combining: Both cases of ST:1 are still valid even after combining.

Hence E.
 1   2   3   4   
Moderators:
Math Expert
113061 posts
DI Forum Moderator
410 posts