Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 14:06 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 14:06
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
mjb
avatar
Current Student
Joined: 27 Dec 2010
Last visit: 08 Jan 2012
Posts: 64
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, International Business, Finance
Schools:Booth R1, Tuck, Ross
Posts: 64
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
NZOMNIAC
Joined: 28 May 2010
Last visit: 02 Feb 2013
Posts: 59
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Status:day of reckoning
Affiliations: CFA Level 3 Candidate
Location: NJ,USA
Concentration: Analytical Consulting
Schools:Harvard(R2 - ding), Wharton(R2 -ding), Booth(ding), Kellogg(waitlisted then dinged)
GPA: 4.0
WE 1: IIT, 6 yrs healthcare consulting
Posts: 59
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
brysondavis
Joined: 11 Feb 2011
Last visit: 16 Mar 2011
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Concentration: Finance
Schools:Booth, Tepper
GPA: 3.9
Posts: 20
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
prashant225
Joined: 17 Feb 2011
Last visit: 20 Jun 2016
Posts: 25
Own Kudos:
Products:
Posts: 25
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Had my interview today with an alum in Mumbai. The alum was from the batch of 2008. Very cordial.

The questions:
why MBA?
Short term and long term goals?
Why Booth?
Ethical dilemma faced?
Any work done which has gone unnoticed?
A situation where i impacted the organization?

I asked some questions to the alum on his booth experience and on why he chose booth?

Overall went well. He said my profile was quite good and he would recommend me positively. Fingers crossed for March 16th.

Regards
Prashant
avatar
NikkiMBA
Joined: 12 Nov 2010
Last visit: 06 Jun 2011
Posts: 123
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 123
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
prashant225
Had my interview today with an alum in Mumbai. The alum was from the batch of 2008. Very cordial.

The questions:
why MBA?
Short term and long term goals?
Why Booth?
Ethical dilemma faced?
Any work done which has gone unnoticed?
A situation where i impacted the organization?

I asked some questions to the alum on his booth experience and on why he chose booth?

Overall went well. He said my profile was quite good and he would recommend me positively. Fingers crossed for March 16th.

Regards
Prashant





Thats great- best of luck! did any one get positive feedback from the on-campus interviewers. Or was it hard to read their expression?
avatar
driege
Joined: 22 Jul 2010
Last visit: 22 Oct 2015
Posts: 205
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Location: Chicago
Concentration: IT Strategy
Schools:Booth R2, Kellogg R2 (W/L - withdrawn)
GPA: 3.9
WE 1: Big 4 IT Auditing
Posts: 205
Kudos: 11
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
NikkiMBA

Thats great- best of luck! did any one get positive feedback from the on-campus interviewers. Or was it hard to read their expression?

I got positive feedback from my on-campus interview with an alum.
avatar
NikkiMBA
Joined: 12 Nov 2010
Last visit: 06 Jun 2011
Posts: 123
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 123
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
driege
NikkiMBA

Thats great- best of luck! did any one get positive feedback from the on-campus interviewers. Or was it hard to read their expression?

I got positive feedback from my on-campus interview with an alum.


That's great!!! I had my interview with 2nd year......no feedback, a few nods, but no face expressions (poker face thruout)
avatar
xaffron9
Joined: 11 Nov 2010
Last visit: 21 Apr 2011
Posts: 15
Posts: 15
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
alienfluid
holywater
P&Q has an article about R1:
https://poetsandquants.com/2011/02/14/wh ... ago-booth/

R1 number of deposits has increased by 40% @_@

That was an interesting article. If the R1 yield has dramatically increased, it'll certainly show in the R2 admits. That's quite unfortunate for us R2 applicants :|.

That's even more unfortunate for us R1 waitlisters
avatar
discrete83
Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Last visit: 02 Jan 2012
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
10
 [8]
Posts: 9
Kudos: 10
 [8]
8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi guys / gals - saw the articles on the increase in 2010 deposits at Chicago Booth, and did a quick calculation on what it meant for Round 2 admit rates.

Worst case scenario: my calculations suggest that we could see an approximately 20-25% decline in Round 2 admits as compared to Round 2 of last year (which would equate to around 120-150 less admits than last year) given the 40% increase in deposits from Round 1 applicants. This would be because the the full year yields will be higher this year. The calculations are below. The numbers are subject to significant change based on the key assumptions.

Key assumptions are:
1) +40% increase in yield in Rd1
2) +15% increase in yield in Rd 2 (expect that given the +40% inc. in Rd 1, admissions will expect higher yields in Rd 2 as well)
3) Increase in deposits equates to increase in yields and eventually, matriculation
4) Chicago Booth doesn't significantly increase class size, in my #s, class size creeps up insignificantly to 581 from 575.
5) Rd 1, Rd 2, and Rd 3 application distributions are approx 35%, 60%, 5% respectively
6) # of total apps, and other class parameters are roughly the same as last year.

Have attached a pdf of the calculations so thats its easier to view than in the message.

Forecasted Chicago Booth Admit & Matriculation Rates for Class of 2013


Actual Baseline Assumed Assumed Assumed Effective R2 Change
2009 2010 2010 2010 2010 2010 vs. Full yr
Full Yr Full Yr Rd 1 Rd 2 Rd 3 Full Yr in 2009

# of Apps 4,299 4,299 1,505 2,579 215 4,299
# of Interviews 2,100 2,100 735 1,260 105 2,100
# of Admits 950 950 333 416 16 764 -20%
# of Matriculates 575 575 282 289 10 581


I-view % 48.8% 48.8% 48.8% 48.8% 48.8% 48.8%
Admit % 45.2% 45.2% 45.2% 33.0% 15.0% 36.4%
Yield Rate % 60.5% 60.5% 84.7% 69.6% 60.5% 76.0%

Submit Distrib % * 35.0% 60.0% 5.0%

Y-o-Y Inc. in Matric. 40% 15% 0%

* Submit Distrib is approximate for 2009, and assumed to be the same in 2010
** Note: I am assuming that the 40% increase in deposits holds true. If there are significant % of withdrawals, the waitlist #s
will be affected. The 40% number is from the Poets & Quants post referenced a few posts ago.

Round 2 & Round 3 admission rates are calculated. Given the increase in yield rates, I am assuming that the admit % rates will
be lowered, and that the Booth admissions committee will also assume an increase in yields for Round 2.
Attachments

Chicago Booth R2 2011 Admit rates.pdf [148.32 KiB]
Downloaded 103 times

User avatar
NZOMNIAC
Joined: 28 May 2010
Last visit: 02 Feb 2013
Posts: 59
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1
Status:day of reckoning
Affiliations: CFA Level 3 Candidate
Location: NJ,USA
Concentration: Analytical Consulting
Schools:Harvard(R2 - ding), Wharton(R2 -ding), Booth(ding), Kellogg(waitlisted then dinged)
GPA: 4.0
WE 1: IIT, 6 yrs healthcare consulting
Posts: 59
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
discrete83
Hi guys / gals - saw th
Round 2 & Round 3 admission rates are calculated. Given the increase in yield rates, I am assuming that the admit % rates will
be lowered, and that the Booth admissions committee will also assume an increase in yields for Round 2.

this is great stuff- still digesting the info - thanks for taking the effort
avatar
justship
Joined: 11 Nov 2010
Last visit: 07 Jul 2011
Posts: 71
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2
Posts: 71
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
discrete83
Hi guys / gals - saw the articles on the increase in 2010 deposits at Chicago Booth, and did a quick calculation on what it meant for Round 2 admit rates.

Worst case scenario: my calculations suggest that we could see an approximately 20-25% decline in Round 2 admits as compared to Round 2 of last year (which would equate to around 120-150 less admits than last year) given the 40% increase in deposits from Round 1 applicants. This would be because the the full year yields will be higher this year. The calculations are below. The numbers are subject to significant change based on the key assumptions.

Well done. Another piece of (anecdotal) data we have is jb88's previous note that Booth interviewed "well over half the applicants in R1," but that increase should already be reflected in the 40% increase in the number of R1 matriculants/deposits. Also, Chicago Booth may want to return to its historical class size average of about 550, which would further negatively impact R2 hopefuls.

But, it's possible that the increase in R1 deposits are from people who will ultimately end up going elsewhere, particularly if Booth moved its deposit deadline earlier than in previous years (and/or peer schools moved their decision dates further back). In any case, we'll all find out in three weeks!
User avatar
jb88
User avatar
BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 06 Dec 2009
Last visit: 24 Nov 2015
Posts: 230
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 23
Status:Enjoying Class
Concentration: Consulting, Strategy
Schools:Booth
GPA: 3.4
GMAT 1: 690 Q46 V39
Posts: 230
Kudos: 88
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
discrete83

Worst case scenario: my calculations suggest that we could see an approximately 20-25% decline in Round 2 admits as compared to Round 2 of last year (which would equate to around 120-150 less admits than last year) given the 40% increase in deposits from Round 1 applicants. This would be because the the full year yields will be higher this year. The calculations are below. The numbers are subject to significant change based on the key assumptions.

Your analysis is great stuff, thanks for putting it together. A couple of things to consider: 1) R1 invites were higher than the 50% 2) R2 invites are "roughly half" (Note: GC spreadsheet data does not appear to reflect either of these) 3) # of apps are in line w/ last year so this is correct and Booth is targeting class size of 580 so this is correct 4) Overall admit rate needs to be b/t 20-22%
avatar
discrete83
Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Last visit: 02 Jan 2012
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Posts: 9
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
agreed with most of the points. Analysis doesn't significantly change when you up #s from 49% to 51-52% ish. The take-away is that I think we might only see around 33% to 35% of R2 interviewees get admits this year. That's a significant change from the ~45% rate admits of people who were interviewed in 2010.

Overall rates (admits as a % of total applications) would also creep down this year if class size remains relatively constant. Would expect it to decrease from ~22% to ~18-19%. This is purely as a result of the higher yields (which is puzzling by itself - are more of the Harvard / Stanford / Wharton dings matriculating at Chicago?)
avatar
SEOmatt
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Last visit: 06 Jan 2014
Posts: 78
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 13
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
discrete83
agreed with most of the points. Analysis doesn't significantly change when you up #s from 49% to 51-52% ish. The take-away is that I think we might only see around 33% to 35% of R2 interviewees get admits this year. That's a significant change from the ~45% rate admits of people who were interviewed in 2010.

Overall rates (admits as a % of total applications) would also creep down this year if class size remains relatively constant. Would expect it to decrease from ~22% to ~18-19%. This is purely as a result of the higher yields (which is puzzling by itself - are more of the Harvard / Stanford / Wharton dings matriculating at Chicago?)

Great job discrete.

One note - according to the P&Q article on Booth admissions, the typical application pool is rough 30% R1, 60% R2, 10% R3. This will change your percentages slightly.

-SEOmatt
avatar
discrete83
Joined: 30 Oct 2010
Last visit: 02 Jan 2012
Posts: 9
Own Kudos:
Posts: 9
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Yup. i also assumed that a higher %age of R1 applications than last year - the +40% increase in deposits seems very high, but higher application volumes would account for that Y-o-Y increase (this effectively increases the forecasted admit% for R2 - otherwise numbers are even lower).

Either way, fingers crossed for now I suppose.
User avatar
Michmax3
Joined: 14 Oct 2009
Last visit: 30 Jun 2012
Posts: 353
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 53
Status:Current Student
Concentration: CPG Marketing
Schools:Chicago Booth 2013, Ross, Duke , Kellogg , Stanford, Haas
GPA: 3.8
Products:
Posts: 353
Kudos: 268
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
xaffron9
alienfluid
holywater
P&Q has an article about R1:
https://poetsandquants.com/2011/02/14/wh ... ago-booth/

R1 number of deposits has increased by 40% @_@

That was an interesting article. If the R1 yield has dramatically increased, it'll certainly show in the R2 admits. That's quite unfortunate for us R2 applicants :|.

That's even more unfortunate for us R1 waitlisters

Did anyone else notice how the article said an interviewer may ask follow up questions based on your score in certain areas? I thought the interviews were blind?
avatar
nkuzmin
Joined: 18 Feb 2011
Last visit: 02 Jun 2011
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
Affiliations: Cerififed Chartered Accountant (UK)
Location: Houston, TX
Schools:Booth (waitlisted), Wharton (dinged), Stanford
GPA: BS 4.0 MS 3.6
Posts: 13
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Guys, and girls, you really think that 5% of error in the calculations based on unproved assumptions really helps your application profile? I'm an R1 applicant, who had been waitlisted and your statistics works against me. I want to believe that everyone who needs MBA will get one, if not, he(she) will arrange his(her) life better without taking $160 k loan.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
jb88
User avatar
BSchool Forum Moderator
Joined: 06 Dec 2009
Last visit: 24 Nov 2015
Posts: 230
Own Kudos:
88
 [1]
Given Kudos: 23
Status:Enjoying Class
Concentration: Consulting, Strategy
Schools:Booth
GPA: 3.4
GMAT 1: 690 Q46 V39
Posts: 230
Kudos: 88
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
nkuzmin
Guys, and girls, you really think that 5% of error in the calculations based on unproved assumptions really helps your application profile? I'm an R1 applicant, who had been waitlisted and your statistics works against me.

No, doing all this forecasting and speculation does absolutely nothing to improve our profiles, but it sure does pass the time and make me feel better :lol: . Based on both anecdotal evidence from admissions officers and students, the deposits are up 40% over last year. Assuming 333 admits in R1 (from discrete's forecast) this could mean that last year 100/333 admits deposited by this time and this year 140/333 (or any other baseline) which doesn't really mean a whole lot, but it could...what if 200/333 last year and this year 280/333. That is a significant increase in yield and very bad for both WL and R2 candidates alike. I think playing with the numbers and asking ?s is healthy, inquisitive, and just what Booth is looking for in its students. Also, I don't see your name on the R1 spreadsheet :problem:
avatar
SEOmatt
Joined: 07 Sep 2010
Last visit: 06 Jan 2014
Posts: 78
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 13
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jb88
I think playing with the numbers and asking ?s is healthy, inquisitive, and just what Booth is looking for in its students. Also, I don't see your name on the R1 spreadsheet :problem:

Agreed.
avatar
nkuzmin
Joined: 18 Feb 2011
Last visit: 02 Jun 2011
Posts: 13
Own Kudos:
1
 [1]
Affiliations: Cerififed Chartered Accountant (UK)
Location: Houston, TX
Schools:Booth (waitlisted), Wharton (dinged), Stanford
GPA: BS 4.0 MS 3.6
Posts: 13
Kudos: 1
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
jb88
nkuzmin
Guys, and girls, you really think that 5% of error in the calculations based on unproved assumptions really helps your application profile? I'm an R1 applicant, who had been waitlisted and your statistics works against me.

No, doing all this forecasting and speculation does absolutely nothing to improve our profiles, but it sure does pass the time and make me feel better :lol: . Based on both anecdotal evidence from admissions officers and students, the deposits are up 40% over last year. Assuming 333 admits in R1 (from discrete's forecast) this could mean that last year 100/333 admits deposited by this time and this year 140/333 (or any other baseline) which doesn't really mean a whole lot, but it could...what if 200/333 last year and this year 280/333. That is a significant increase in yield and very bad for both WL and R2 candidates alike. I think playing with the numbers and asking ?s is healthy, inquisitive, and just what Booth is looking for in its students. Also, I don't see your name on the R1 spreadsheet :problem:
:) long story short, I'm an international applicant/28/M/710 (mostly because of math, if only I spoke better English:))/5 years in "big 4".

Posted from my mobile device
   1  ...  127   128   129   130   131  ...  185   
Moderator:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts