One glance at the statements is enough to tell that this question is more about a and b and less about x. The equation given as data just furthers the point.
ax + b = 0. Since the question stem asks if x>0, we keep x on one side of the equation.
x = - \(\frac{b }{ a}\).
Therefore, the question stem can now be rephrased as “Is –\(\frac{b }{ a}\) > 0?”.
-(\(\frac{b}{a}\)) will be positive if (\(\frac{b}{a}\)) is negative; If (\(\frac{b}{a}\)) has to be negative, b and a should be of opposite signs.
The question can be rephrased to “
Are a and b of opposite signs?”. You will see that the statements now make a lot more sense because the question is also about the signs of a and b.
From statement I alone, a+b > 0.
Note that a sum or two variables is never enough to tell you a lot about the signs, compared to a product or a division of terms.
At the most, a+b>0 can tell you that both numbers cannot be ZERO and both cannot be negative at the same time. That’s about it!
Statement I alone is insufficient to say if a and b, are of opposite signs. Answer option A and D can be eliminated. Possible answer options are B, C and E.
From statement II alone, a-b>0.
A similar thing can be said about a difference of terms.
At the most, a-b>0 tells us that both numbers are not ZERO. Nothing more, nothing less!
Statement II alone is insufficient to answer the question. Answer option B can be eliminated. Possible answer options are C and E.
Combining statements I and II, we have the following:
From statement I, a + b > 0; from statement II, a – b > 0.
Since both inequalities have the same sign, they can be added. In fact, GMAT expects you to know this property of inequalities and use it to combine statements.
Adding the two inequalities, we have
2a > 0 or a > 0.
The combination of statements tells us that a is positive but provides us with no information about b.
The combination of statements is insufficient. Answer option C can be eliminated.
The correct answer option is E.
Hope that helps!
Aravind B T