Traditional "talk" therapy, in which a patient with a psychological

Question

Traditional "talk" therapy, in which a patient with a psychological disorder discusses it with a trained therapist, produces chemical changes in the brain. These changes seem to correspond to improvements in certain aspects of the patient's behavior. Thus, physicians will eventually be able to treat such patients as effectively through pharmacological intervention in the brain's neurochemistry as through the lengthy intermediary of traditional "talk" methods.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) All neurochemical changes produce corresponding psychological changes.

(B) Improvements in a patient's behavior produced by "talk" therapy occur only through chemical changes in the brain's neurochemistry.

(C) "Talk" therapy has not been effective at bringing about psychological change.

(D) If chemical changes in the brain's neurochemistry correspond to improvements in patient behavior, then psychology and neuroscience will eventually be indistinguishable.

(E) Direct intervention in the brain's neurochemistry is likely to become a less expensive way of treating psychological disorders than is "talk" therapy.

gmatexam439 · Answer

Traditional "talk" therapy, in which a patient with a psychological disorder discusses it with a trained therapist, produces chemical changes in the brain. These changes seem to correspond to improvements in certain aspects of the patient's behavior. Thus, physicians will eventually be able to treat such patients as effectively through pharmacological intervention in the brain's neurochemistry as through the lengthy intermediary of traditional "talk" methods.

Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?

(A) All neurochemical changes produce corresponding psychological changes. - We can't say about "all" changes from the above passage. Incorrect .

(B) Improvements in a patient's behavior produced by "talk" therapy occur only through chemical changes in the brain's neurochemistry. - CORRECT. It refutes the possibility that any changes in brain other than the chemical changes help in the betterment of the psycho .

(C) "Talk" therapy has not been effective at bringing about psychological change. - The is a weakner. Incorrect .

(D) If chemical changes in the brain's neurochemistry correspond to improvements in patient behavior, then psychology and neuroscience will eventually be indistinguishable. - Alright let them be one. This is just a stated fact and out of scope of the argument at hand. Incorrect .

(E) Direct intervention in the brain's neurochemistry is likely to become a less expensive way of treating psychological disorders than is "talk" therapy - Ok let the direct intervention be cheaper. It is out of scope. Incorrect.

roadrunner · Answer

Assumption questions becomes much easier to attack when one understands the underlying idea of drawing conclusion. When author draws conclusion based on certain observation, he/she is 100% sure conclusion is correct and only observed behavior is responsible.

Observation - talk therapy releases certain chemicals in brain and patient's behavior improves.
Conclusion - use medicine to produce same chemicals and cut short recovery period

(A) All neurochemical changes produce corresponding psychological changes. Not all. OOS

(B) Improvements in a patient's behavior produced by "talk" therapy occur only through chemical changes in the brain's neurochemistry.
 Negating this choice weakens author's conclusion. Thus, is correct choice.

(C) "Talk" therapy has not been effective at bringing about psychological change.
 OOS

(D) If chemical changes in the brain's neurochemistry correspond to improvements in patient behavior, then psychology and neuroscience will eventually be indistinguishable.
 Author is not comparing psychology and neuroscience.

(E) Direct intervention in the brain's neurochemistry is likely to become a less expensive way of treating psychological disorders than is "talk" therapy. 
 Never compared cost of treatment.

rvgmat12 · Answer

From Powerscore:

This stimulus discusses “talk therapy,” which, as its name suggests, refers to therapy in which a patient discusses his or her psychological disorder with a trained therapist. This type of therapy, we are told, causes chemical changes in the brain that seem to correspond with improvements in behavior:
Cause ..... ..... ..... ..... Effect

Talk Therapy ..... :arrow: ..... Chemical Changes, Better Behavior

The author concludes that doctors will eventually be able to bring about the same behavioral improvements by changing the brain’s neurochemistry with pharmaceuticals as with talk therapy’s lengthy sessions:
Cause ..... ..... ..... ..... ..... Effect

Pharmaceuticals ..... :arrow: ..... Chemical Changes, Better Behavior
In reaching the conclusion that pharmaceuticals will eventually be as good as therapy, the author is attributing the noted behavioral improvements entirely to the chemical changes that take place in the brain.

The stimulus is followed by an Assumption question, so the correct answer choice will provide an assumption that the author relies upon in reaching the conclusion that pharmacological intervention will eventually be able to take the place of talk therapy. To confirm the correct answer choice, apply the Assumption Negation Technique by logically negating, or taking away, the assumption, and noting the effects on the author’s argument; when negating a given assumption weakens an argument, it becomes clear that the argument relies upon that assumption.

Answer choice (A): This is not an assumption on which the author’s conclusion relies. To confirm this to be an incorrect answer choice, we can apply the Assumption Negation Technique, take away the assumption, and note whether the negated version weakens the author’s conclusion:
Not all neurochemical changes bring about psychological changes.
This is a pretty limited claim—basically, that some (that is, at least one) neurochemical changes do not bring about psychological changes. Even if this were the case, this would not weaken the author’s argument that pharmacological intervention will eventually bring about the same benefits as talk therapy—this conclusion does not require that every single chemical change be associated with psychological changes.

Answer choice (B): This is the correct answer choice; the author assumes that the chemical changes are the sole cause of the noted improvements in behavior—and that talk therapy is not a necessity in that equation. To confirm this as an assumption on which the author’s argument relies, we can negate, or take away, this choice and note whether the author’s argument suffers:
Behavioral improvements do not occur only through chemical changes.
This negated version weakens the author’s argument, which relies on the idea that pharmaceuticals can cause chemical changes and therefore replace talk therapy. If, as this negated version provides, the behavior changes require more than just chemical changes, it is less likely that pharmacological intervention will someday be able to replace talk therapy.

Answer choice (C): The author does not assume that talk therapy is ineffective, but rather that it can be replaced by pharmacological intervention. To confirm that this is not an assumption on which the author’s argument relies, we can logically negate the assumption to see whether the argument suffers as a result. The negated version of this answer choice would be:
Talk therapy has been effective in bringing about psychological change.
The negated version of this answer choice does not weaken the author’s conclusion about pharmacological intervention, so this cannot be an assumption that is required by the author’s argument.

Answer choice (D): The assumption presented here is that if neurochemistry is associated with improved behavior, then psychology and neuroscience will eventually be indistinguishable from one another. In the stimulus, the author’s conclusion is that behavior will eventually be able to be modified through pharmacological intervention alone—but that is not the same as claiming that psychology and neuroscience will eventually be the same thing.

Answer choice (E): This choice discusses the relative expense associated with different approaches to the treatment of psychological disorders, but that issue is not mentioned or alluded to in the stimulus; this cannot be an assumption on which the author’s argument relies. To confirm this answer choice as incorrect, we can apply Assumption Negation and note whether or not the argument from the stimulus is weakened. The negated version of this answer choice is as follows:

Direct intervention is not likely to be a less expensive way to deal with disorders.

This would have no effect on the author’s conclusion, confirming that the author’s argument does not require this choice’s assumption

Posted from my mobile device

VerbalBot · Answer

Hello from the GMAT Club VerbalBot!

Thanks to another GMAT Club member, I have just discovered this valuable topic, yet it had no discussion for over a year. I am now bumping it up - doing my job. I think you may find it valuable (esp those replies with Kudos).

Want to see all other topics I dig out? Follow me (click follow button on profile). You will receive a summary of all topics I bump in your profile area as well as via email.

Traditional "talk" therapy, in which a patient with a psychological

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Critical Reasoning (CR) Questions

Traditional "talk" therapy, in which a patient with a psychological

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards