Traditional theories of animal behavior assert that animal conflict

Question

Traditional theories of animal behavior assert that
animal conflict within a species is highly ritualized
and does not vary from contest to contest. This
species-specific model assumes that repetitive use of
  (5)   the same visual and vocal displays and an absence of
escalated fighting evolved to prevent injury. The
contestant that exhibits the “best” display wins the
contested resource. Galápagos tortoises, for instance,
settle contests on the basis of height: the ritualized
  (10)   display consists of two tortoises facing one another
and stretching their necks skyward; the tortoise
perceived as being “taller” wins.

In populations of the spider  Agelenopsis aperta, 
however, fighting behavior varies greatly from contest
  (15)   to contest. In addition, fighting is not limited to
displays: biting and shoving are common. Susan
Riechert argues that a recently developed model,
evolutionary game theory, provides a closer fit to
A. aperta territorial disputes than does the species-
  (20)   specific model, because it explains variations in
conflict behavior that may result from varying
conditions, such as differences in size, age, and
experience of combatants. Evolutionary game theory
was adapted from the classical game theory that was
  (25)   developed by von Neumann and Morganstern to
explain human behavior in conflict situations. In both
classical and evolutionary game theory, strategies are
weighed in terms of maximizing the average payoff
against contestants employing both the same and
  (30)   different strategies. For example, a spider may engage
in escalated fighting during a dispute only if the
disputed resource is valuable enough to warrant the
risk of physical injury. There are, however, two major
differences between the classical and evolutionary
  (35)   theories. First, whereas in classical game theory it is
assumed that rational thought is used to determine
which action to take, evolutionary game theory
assumes that instinct and long-term species advantage
ultimately determine the strategies that are exhibited.
  (40)   The other difference is in the payoffs: in classical
game theory, the payoffs are determined by an
individual’s personal judgment of what constitutes
winning; in evolutionary game theory, the payoffs are
defined in terms of reproductive success.

(45)   In studying populations of A. aperta in a
grassland habitat and a riparian habitat, Riechert
predicts that such factors as the size of the opponents,
the potential rate of predation in a habitat, and the
probability of winning a subsequent site if the dispute
  (50)   is lost will all affect the behavior of spiders in
territorial disputes. In addition, she predicts that the
markedly different levels of competition for web sites
in the two habitats will affect the spiders’ willingness
to engage in escalated fighting. In the grassland,
  (55)   where 12 percent of the habitat is available for
occupation by A. aperta, Riechert predicts that
spiders will be more willing to engage in escalated
fighting than in the riparian habitat, where 90 percent
of the habitat is suitable for occupation.    1 
 1. Which one of the following best states the main idea of the passage?

(A) Evolutionary game theory and classical game theory can be used to analyze the process of decision-making used by humans and animals in settling disputes.
(B) A. aperta in grassland habitats and riparian habitats exhibit an unusually wide variety of fighting behaviors in territorial disputes.
(C) Evolutionary game theory may be useful in explaining the behavior of certain spiders during territorial disputes.
(D) The traditional theory of animal behavior in conflict situations cannot be used to explain the fighting behavior of most species.
(E) Evolutionary game theory, adapted from classical game theory, is currently used by scientists to predict the behavior of spiders in site selection.

2 
 2. The author of the passage mentions Galápagos tortoises in the first paragraph most likely in order to

(A) describe a kind of fighting behavior that is used by only a few species
(B) suggest that repetitive use of the same visual and vocal displays is a kind of fighting behavior used by some but not all species
(C) provide evidence to support the claim that fighting behavior does not vary greatly from contest to contest for most species
(D) provide an example of a fighting behavior that is unique to a particular species
(E) provide an example of a ritualized fighting behavior of the kind that traditional theorists assume is the norm for most species

3 
 3. Which one of the following, if true, is LEAST consistent with Riechert’s theory about fighting behavior in spiders?

(A) Spiders in the grassland habitat engage in escalated fighting when a disputed site is highly desirable.
(B) Spiders in the riparian habitat are not willing to engage in escalated fighting for less-than suitable sites.
(C) Spiders in the riparian habitat confine their fighting to displays more regularly than do spiders in the grassland habitat.
(D) Spiders in the riparian habitat are as willing to engage in escalated fighting as are spiders in the grassland habitat.
(E) Spiders in the riparian habitat are more likely to withdraw when faced with a larger opponent in territorial disputes than are spiders in the grassland habitat.

4 
 4. Which one of the following best states the function of the third paragraph of the passage?

(A) It develops a comparison of the two theories that were introduced in the preceding paragraph.
(B) It continues a discussion of a controversial theory described in the first two paragraphs of the passage.
(C) It describes an experiment that provides support for the theory described in the preceding paragraph.
(D) It describes a rare phenomenon that cannot be accounted for by the theory described in the first paragraph.
(E) It describes predictions that can be used to test the validity of a theory described in a preceding paragraph.

5 
 5. The passage suggests which one of the following about the behavior of A. aperta in conflict situations?

(A) They exhibit variations in fighting behavior from contest to contest primarily because of the different levels of competition for suitable sites in different habitats.
(B) They may confine their fighting behavior to displays if the value of a disputed resource is too low and the risk of physical injury is too great.
(C) They exhibit variations in fighting behavior that are similar to those exhibited by members of most other species of animals.
(D) They are more likely to engage in escalated fighting during disputes than to limit their fighting behavior to visual and vocal displays.
(E) They are more willing to engage in escalated fighting during conflict situations than are members of most other species of animals.

6 
 6. The primary purpose of the passage is to

(A) present an alternative to a traditional approach
(B) describe a phenomenon and provide specific examples
(C) evaluate evidence used to support an argument
(D) present data that refutes a controversial theory 
(E) suggest that a new theory may be based on inadequate research

Sajjad1994 · Answer

Explanation

1. Which one of the following best states the main idea of the passage?

Explanation

The main idea is merely that there’s a new theory (evolutionary game theory) that may better explain some animals’ conflict behavior than the traditional theory. And since the passage applies this specifically to the  A. aperta , this matches  (C)  pretty well.

(A) Distortion.  These theories can help explain what decisions factor into disputes, but they don’t go so far as to explain the decision-making process. Moreover, while we are told that classical game theory was designed to explain human decision-making, nothing in the passage indicates that evolutionary game theory explains human factors.

(B)  Too narrow, and a distortion. The point of the passage is that evolutionary game theory may have application to intraspecies conflict, not just to tell us details about the spider used as an example.

(D) Extreme.  We know it doesn’t quite fit the behavior of A. aperta, but that’s hardly enough to say it can’t explain behavior of most species.

(E) Extreme.  We know that Reichert believes it can be used, but that doesn’t mean the rest of the scientific community is on board. And even if they do agree with Reichert, that’s not the main point of the passage.

Answer: C

Its_me_aka_ak · Answer

Plz explain Q 5
i was confused between A and B and agreed to both but went for A. i think the word 'PRIMARILY' was the part that made this choice wrong but kindly explain the reasoning comparing both choices

Sajjad1994 · Answer

Remember that  paragraph 3  refers to what Reichert predicts these spiders would do. That doesn’t tell us what the passage suggests is actually their behavior. For that, we have to check  Paragraph 2. Line 30  introduces an example of how spiders would be more willing to fight only when the item in dispute is valuable enough. That seems to be summed up perfectly by answer  choice (B).

(A)  is Extreme. We’re told that different levels of competition is a factor, but not that it’s the primary factor. This is a classic RC trap.

Raman109 · Answer

5. The passage suggests which one of the following about the behavior of A. aperta in conflict situations?

(A) They exhibit variations in fighting behavior from contest to contest primarily because of the different levels of competition for suitable sites in different habitats. - This is too narrow. "Different levels of competition for suitable sites in different habitats" is one of the reasons and not the primary reasons.

(B) They may confine their fighting behavior to displays if the value of a disputed resource is too low and the risk of physical injury is too great. - ok.

(C) They exhibit variations in fighting behavior that are similar to those exhibited by members of most other species of animals. - A comparison with most of them is out of scope.

(D) They are more likely to engage in escalated fighting during disputes than to limit their fighting behavior to visual and vocal displays. - Can't be inferred.

(E) They are more willing to engage in escalated fighting during conflict situations than are members of most other species of animals. - This comparison is out of scope.

Sajjad1994 · Answer

Explanation

2. The author of the passage mentions Galápagos tortoises in the first paragraph most likely in order to

Consulting our r oadmap, Paragraph 1 is about the traditional theory of animal conflict – animals have evolved so that conflicts don’t result in injury. The Galapagos tortoises are just an example of an animal that fits this theory, which is exactly what answer  choice    (E)  says.

(A)  Accor ding to traditional theory, this kind of behavior is the norm for all animals. Even if the new theory is valid, we still don’t know how many species may still fit the old theory – it could be a lot more than  “a few.” 
 
 (B)  Distor tion. While this is apparently true of the tortoise, the author does not cite the tortoise as an exceptional example of just  “some but not all”  species. The author cites the tortoise as an excellent example of these behaviors because they fit the classical model

(C)  Extr eme. Again, the traditional theory is just that – a theory. The example of one animal does not support that theory’s application to  “most species.” 
 
 (D)  The tor toise is just one example of a nonaggressive fighting style, but there’s nothing here to suggest that the fighting style is unique.

Answer: E

Sajjad1994 · Answer

Explanation

6. The primary purpose of the passage is to

Explanation

When we finished the passage, we noticed that the  author never really had a strong opinion. He simply introduced the new theory, and that was that. So we have to make sure the correct answer doesn’t go any further than that.

(A)  Simply pr esenting an alternative approach (i.e., theory)? That’s exactly what we want.

(B)  While examples of a phenomenon ar e provided, this is not the author’s purpose. Those examples are provided to illustrate the new theory for the phenomeneon.

(C)  The author does no evaluation. This is simply a  descriptive passage.

(D)  While the A.aper ta  evidence may r efute the traditional theory, the passage never suggests that the theory is  “controversial.”  Too extreme.
 
 (E)  The author doesn’ t suggest anything, let alone that the new theory may be inadequately supported. Plus, there is no research mentioned in this passage – simply predictions on how the new theory might apply.

Answer: A

VerbalBot · Answer

Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.

Traditional theories of animal behavior assert that animal conflict

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Reading Comprehension (RC) Questions

Traditional theories of animal behavior assert that animal conflict

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards