21. The author of the passage is primarily concerned with discussing
(A) the current
debate on whether the morphological attributes of wind-pollinated plants are evolutionary adaptations
NO debate if you see what I wrote in the explanation of the passage. It is immediately recognized that no debate or fight or different opinions
(B) the kinds of airflow patterns that permit wind-pollinated plants to capture pollen most efficiently
yes but this was just an example
(C) the ways in which the reproductive processes of wind-pollinated plants are controlled by random events
no. to narrow in scope. Also the mention of random patterns is barely a few words
(D) a
recently proposed explanation of a way in which wind-pollinated plants reduce pollen waste
yes true. new studies suggest the trees do not waste pollen to compensate the long-distance running of the pollen and the fact that it could not reach them proficiently
(E) a specific morphological attribute that permits one species of wind-pollinated plant to capture pollen
no. the passage said about that morphological \(\geq \) evolution
IF skim the passage quickly you should notice a lot of shifts about: the recent study, however, this fact doe snot explain fully why is that and need to know more.
With this in mind, notice how ONLY d could catch the essence of those shifts. The others answer choice are TOO specific: organs, evolution, etc
The difference between this kind of passages is that the GRE or GMAT use more complex words and sentences to say essentially the same thing, in an easier way, what a TOEFL iBT passage says about the main idea
The following is an excerpt from the old TOEFL iBT guide to show you the main idea
Quote:
It should be obvious that cetaceans-whales, porpoises, and dolphins-are mammals. They breathe through lungs, not through gills, and give birth to live young. Their streamlined bodies, the absence of hind legs, and the presence of a fluke1 and blowhole2 cannot disguise their affinities with land dwelling mammals. However, unlike the cases of sea otters and pinnipeds (seals, sea lions, and walruses, whose limbs are functional both on land and at sea), it is not easy to envision what the first whales looked like. Extinct but already fully marine cetaceans are known from the fossil record. ■How was the gap between a walking mammal and a swimming whale bridged? ■Missing until recently were fossils clearly intermediate, or transitional, between land mammals and cetaceans.
■Very exciting discoveries have finally allowed scientists to reconstruct the most likely origins of cetaceans. ■In 1979, a team looking for fossils in northern Pakistan found what proved to be the oldest fossil whale. The fossil was officially named Pakicetus in honor of the country where the discovery was made. Pakicetus was found embedded in rocks formed from river deposits that were 52 million years old. The river that formed these deposits was actually not far from an ancient ocean known as the Tethys Sea.
The fossil consists of a complete skull of an archaeocyte, an extinct group of ancestors of modern cetaceans. Although limited to a skull, the Pakicetus fossil precious details on the origins of cetaceans. The skull is cetacean-like but its jawbones lack the enlarged space that is filled with fat or oil and used for receiving underwater sound in modern whales. Pakicetus probably detected sound through the ear opening as in land mammals. The skull also lacks a blowhole, another cetacean adaptation for diving. Other features, however, show experts that Pakicetus is a transitional form between a group of extinct flesh- eating mammals, the mesonychids, and cetaceans. It has been suggested that Pakicetus fed on fish in shallow water and was not yet adapted for life in the open ocean. It probably bred and gave birth on land.
Another major discovery was made in Egypt in 1989. Several skeletons of another early whale, Basilosaurus, were found in sediments left by the Tethys Sea and now exposed in the Sahara desert. This whale lived around 40 million years ago, 12 million years after Pakicetus. Many incomplete skeletons were found but they included, for the first time in an archaeocyte, a complete hind leg that features a foot with three tiny toes. Such legs would have been far too small to have supported the 50-foot-long Basilosaurus on land. Basilosaurus was undoubtedly a fully marine whale with possibly nonfunctional, or vestigial, hind legs.
An even more exciting find was reported in 1994, also from Pakistan. The now extinct whale Ambulocetus natans (“the walking whale that swam”) lived in the Tethys Sea 49 million years ago. It lived around 3 million years after Pakicetus but 9 million before Basilosaurus. The fossil luckily includes a good portion of the hind legs. The legs were strong and ended in long feet very much like those of a modern pinniped. The legs were certainly functional both on land and at sea. The whale retained a tail and lacked a fluke, the major means of locomotion in modern cetaceans. The structure of the backbone shows, however, that Ambulocetus swam like modern whales by moving the rear portion of its body up and down, even though a fluke was missing. The large hind legs were used for propulsion in water. On land, where it probably bred and gave birth, Ambulocetus may have moved around very much like a modern sea lion. It was undoubtedly a whale that linked life on land with life at sea.
Complete the summary by selecting the THREE answer choices that express the most important ideas in the passage. Some answer choices do not belong in the summary because they express ideas that are not presented in the passage or are minor ideas in the passage. A. Recent discoveries of fossils have helped to show the link between land mammals and cetaceans.
B. The discovery of Ambulocetus natans provided evidence for a whale that lived both on land and at sea.
C. The skeleton of Basilosaurus was found in what had been the Tethys Sea, an area rich in fossil evidence.
D. Pakicetus is the oldest fossil whale yet to be found.
E. Fossils thought to be transitional forms between walking mammals and swimming whales were found.
F. Ambulocetus’ hind legs were used for propulsion in the water.
I did not even read the passage above BUT if I read carefully the following, what I reckon is:A. Recent discoveries of fossils have helped to show the link between land mammals and cetaceans.
This looks good. We need the main idea. Of course IF the passage talks about the origin of the whales, what is best of a link to show us the origin
B. The discovery of Ambulocetus natans provided evidence for a whale that lived both on land and at sea.
Also looks pretty good. We need link to find the origin. And we find a piece maybe is the link or part of that link. the option above should tell us the big picture of the passage above.
C. The skeleton of Basilosaurus was found in what had been the Tethys Sea, an area rich in fossil evidence.
No. It just say where it was found. detail
D. Pakicetus is the oldest fossil whale yet to be found.
just a statistic
E. Fossils thought to be transitional forms between walking mammals and swimming whales were found.
Yes. another piece or demonstration of the link: mammals >>> cetaceans
F. Ambulocetus’ hind legs were used for propulsion in the water.
Just a detail what they did
Source of the passage
https://toeflibt.home.blog/2019/11/11/t ... was%20made.