Last visit was: 21 Apr 2026, 23:04 It is currently 21 Apr 2026, 23:04
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 21 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,740
Own Kudos:
810,506
 [4]
Given Kudos: 105,815
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,740
Kudos: 810,506
 [4]
Kudos
Add Kudos
4
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Apr 2026
Posts: 11,229
Own Kudos:
44,985
 [2]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,229
Kudos: 44,985
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
GMATWhizTeam
User avatar
GMATWhiz Representative
Joined: 07 May 2019
Last visit: 17 Mar 2026
Posts: 3,374
Own Kudos:
2,193
 [2]
Given Kudos: 70
Location: India
GMAT 1: 740 Q50 V41
GMAT 2: 760 Q51 V40
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT 2: 760 Q51 V40
Posts: 3,374
Kudos: 2,193
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
dave13
Joined: 09 Mar 2016
Last visit: 15 Mar 2026
Posts: 1,086
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 3,851
Posts: 1,086
Kudos: 1,137
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
chetan2u
Bunuel
Two shopkeepers, Bruce and Wayne, sold the same toy at different prices. If the ratio of the prices at which Bruce and Wayne purchased the toy was 3:4 respectively, who made a greater profit on selling the toy?

(1) The profit percentage of Bruce was higher than that of Wayne.
(2) The ratio of the prices at which Bruce and Wayne sold the toy was 4:3 respectively.

We do not know the exact amount but the ratio of cost to B and W = 3:4 =3a:4a

(1) The profit percentage of Bruce was higher than that of Wayne.
since we do not the exact values of cost or the profit %, we cannot say anything.
Say profit % on 3a is 50, then profit = 1.5a..
Now if profit % on 4a is 10, then profit is 0.4a <1.5a, but if the profit % is 40%, then profit is 1.6a>1.5a....
Insuff

(2) The ratio of the prices at which Bruce and Wayne sold the toy was 4:3 respectively.
So the selling prices are 4b and 3b.
Now Bruce purchased the toy at 4a-3a or a less, and sold it at higher price by 4b-3b=b. Thus, profit of Bruce is more than that of Wayne by a+b.
Suff

B


hi chetan2u

Can you please elabarote more on highlighted part ? The ratio of selling toys 4b-3b=b is clear since purchased price was 3b and selling price is 4b hemce b is profit so its clear but how do you come up with "4a-3a or a less" and "profit of Bruce is more than that of Wayne by a+b. ' ?
maybe some simple figures would work for better understanding :grin:
thanks :)
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 18 Apr 2026
Posts: 11,229
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,229
Kudos: 44,985
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
dave13
chetan2u
Bunuel
Two shopkeepers, Bruce and Wayne, sold the same toy at different prices. If the ratio of the prices at which Bruce and Wayne purchased the toy was 3:4 respectively, who made a greater profit on selling the toy?

(1) The profit percentage of Bruce was higher than that of Wayne.
(2) The ratio of the prices at which Bruce and Wayne sold the toy was 4:3 respectively.

We do not know the exact amount but the ratio of cost to B and W = 3:4 =3a:4a

(1) The profit percentage of Bruce was higher than that of Wayne.
since we do not the exact values of cost or the profit %, we cannot say anything.
Say profit % on 3a is 50, then profit = 1.5a..
Now if profit % on 4a is 10, then profit is 0.4a <1.5a, but if the profit % is 40%, then profit is 1.6a>1.5a....
Insuff

(2) The ratio of the prices at which Bruce and Wayne sold the toy was 4:3 respectively.
So the selling prices are 4b and 3b.
Now Bruce purchased the toy at 4a-3a or a less, and sold it at higher price by 4b-3b=b. Thus, profit of Bruce is more than that of Wayne by a+b.
Suff

B


hi chetan2u

Can you please elabarote more on highlighted part ? The ratio of selling toys 4b-3b=b is clear since purchased price was 3b and selling price is 4b hemce b is profit so its clear but how do you come up with "4a-3a or a less" and "profit of Bruce is more than that of Wayne by a+b. ' ?
maybe some simple figures would work for better understanding :grin:
thanks :)


Hi,
Say B and W purchased it in ratio 3:4, say 300:400..... B spent a or 100 less
They sold it in ratio 4:3, say 800:600... here B sold it for b or 200 more
So profit is a+b or 100+200=300 more.

So profit of B otherwise = 800-300=500, and that of W is 600-400=200.
Thus B is 500-200 or 300 more, which is nothing but a+b as shown above
User avatar
Kritisood
Joined: 21 Feb 2017
Last visit: 19 Jul 2023
Posts: 488
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 1,090
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
Products:
GMAT 1: 700 Q47 V39
Posts: 488
Kudos: 1,315
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
let
profit of B (Pb)
profit of W (Pw)

from statement 1 we get
\(\frac{Pb}{3x}*100>\frac{Pw}{4x}*100\)

\(Pb>\frac{3}{4}Pw\) ---condition

if Pb =1 and Pw =1
then the condition satisfies and profits are equal

now take Pb=2 and Pw=1
again the condition satisfied but now the profit of Pb is higher

two answers hence insufficient.

from statement 2 we get
4y-3x and 3y-4x
try putting some values you'll always get that 4y-3x is greater than 3y-4x

another approach
let 4y-3x>3y-x
y>-x
y+x>0 this is always true as since x and y are positive
hence sufficient
User avatar
msignatius
Joined: 28 Aug 2025
Last visit: 09 Apr 2026
Posts: 131
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 31
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Marketing
GMAT Focus 1: 705 Q86 V85 DI84
GPA: 3.5
WE:Marketing (Consulting)
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 705 Q86 V85 DI84
Posts: 131
Kudos: 98
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
It's late in the night. Bruce Wayne, after a long-day's stint of selling toys - an amiable profession the billionaire has taken to, to cope with the troubles of crimefighting all night - is accounting for the day's profits. He notices something strange: Half of the receipts say 'Bruce', the remaining half say 'Wayne'. That's when it hits him, the Joker's latest abomination - the "Personality Splitter", a diabolical device - has arrested his mind!

(He still needs to account for the profits though, but he notices, Bruce and Wayne - now split into two - proceeded to do business differently.)

Bruce, it turns out, bought the toy for $3, while Wayne, for $4. (This assuming values would account for the 3:4 ratio).

As Statement I states, Bruce's profit was higher than Wayne's. But it was clear even in the dead of the night to Bruce Wayne that this wasn't nearly enough information - the receipts highlighted, Bruce sold the $3 toy at a 10% profit (we plug in a value), amounting to a total sale of $9.90, and a profit of 90c. Wayne, on the other hand, sold four of his $4 toy at a 5% profit (plugging in a value - as the profit percentage of Bruce is higher as per the statement) - to a total sale of $16.80, or a profit of 80c. Any other value will lead to variable answers, so Statement I is not enough.

Not to be flummoxed any further, Bruce Wayne proceeded to the second statement - "The Ratio of prices at which Bruce and Wayne sold the toy was 4:3 respectively".

With a little help from Alfred, the billionaire had this figured out:

Now, even if Bruce had purchased his toy at 3c and Wayne at 4c, and sold it at, respectively, $40 and $30, we know for a fact that the $0.03 -> $40 will be a higher profit percentage than $0.04 -> $30. As the ratio for the cost prices shows one product more costly, and the ratio for the selling prices shows that same product as selling at a lower price, no matter the values, Bruce will always be more profitable than Wayne. Hence, B alone is sufficient.

The billionaire, after completing a hard day's work, decided to rest for the night. And as he did so, he muttered to himself, "I'm the mathematician GMAT deserves, not the one it needs right now".
Bunuel
Two shopkeepers, Bruce and Wayne, sold the same toy at different prices. If the ratio of the prices at which Bruce and Wayne purchased the toy was 3:4 respectively, who made a greater profit on selling the toy?

(1) The profit percentage of Bruce was higher than that of Wayne.
(2) The ratio of the prices at which Bruce and Wayne sold the toy was 4:3 respectively.


Are You Up For the Challenge: 700 Level Questions
Moderators:
Math Expert
109740 posts
498 posts
211 posts