Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Nov 2007:30 AM PST
-08:30 AM PST
Learn what truly sets the UC Riverside MBA apart and how it helps in your professional growth
Nov 2211:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment- Nov 23
11:00 AM IST
-01:00 PM IST
Attend this free GMAT Algebra Webinar and learn how to master the most challenging Inequalities and Absolute Value problems with ease. 
Nov 2510:00 AM EST
-11:00 AM EST
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
01 Aug 2022, 06:18
Kudos
Bookmarks
Piyushggmat
The "that" before "they are restricted ..." acts as a conjunction that correct joins that clause to the rest of the sentence.
05 Aug 2022, 11:04
Kudos
Bookmarks
Piyushggmat
Good question. The word "that" creates a dependent clause that can't stand on its own.
"Philadelphia lost by 30 points" is a complete sentence.
"That Philadelphia lost by 30 points" is not.
So it's fine to write something like, "James Harden took 75 consecutive step-back threes, with the result that Philadelphia lost by 30." The portion in red is dependent on what comes before.
Similarly, the phrase "that they are restricted" can't stand on its own, so the construction is okay.
I hope that clears things up!
12 Oct 2022, 10:56
Kudos
Bookmarks
Dear experts, RonTargetTestPrep GMATNinja and others,
I read all comments. Many people asked about -ed modifier.
Many explanations are provided but most of them are " -ed,_____________" or "Nount + -ed modifier"
What about -ed modifier follows a comma : ________(sentence/clause)_______, -ed.
I know that there is no touch rule, but I would like to know in term of grammar. What things that -ed can modify? Is it the same as -ing following comma?
I read all comments. Many people asked about -ed modifier.
Many explanations are provided but most of them are " -ed,_____________" or "Nount + -ed modifier"
What about -ed modifier follows a comma : ________(sentence/clause)_______, -ed.
I know that there is no touch rule, but I would like to know in term of grammar. What things that -ed can modify? Is it the same as -ing following comma?
