Last visit was: 22 Apr 2026, 18:00 It is currently 22 Apr 2026, 18:00
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,754
Own Kudos:
810,671
 [5]
Given Kudos: 105,823
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,754
Kudos: 810,671
 [5]
Kudos
Add Kudos
5
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
Vatsal7794
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 17 Mar 2021
Last visit: 12 Oct 2025
Posts: 246
Own Kudos:
127
 [1]
Given Kudos: 123
Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q44 V36
GPA: 3.5
GMAT 1: 660 Q44 V36
Posts: 246
Kudos: 127
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
abhimanyu22j
Joined: 30 Jun 2021
Last visit: 07 Mar 2024
Posts: 1
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 12
Location: India
Posts: 1
Kudos: 2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
VivekSri
Joined: 01 May 2022
Last visit: 05 Feb 2026
Posts: 468
Own Kudos:
769
 [1]
Given Kudos: 117
Location: India
WE:Engineering (Consulting)
Posts: 468
Kudos: 769
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
abhimanyu22j
On what ground is D eliminated ?

This is the classic question and it works on below parallel reasoning :
If we throw stones then water spills this does not mean that if water spills, then we have thrown stones. There are can be many reason of water spills.


Now the option D is wrong because there is no generalization that is broad, actually it is citing the generalization that can be true or false. It will not be absolutely true every time. So the correct answer is

It treats an event that can cause a certain result as though that event is necessary to bring about that result.
User avatar
Nielgmat
Joined: 08 Apr 2022
Last visit: 01 Apr 2024
Posts: 129
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 63
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Human Resources
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
GPA: 2.8
Products:
GMAT 1: 730 Q49 V41
Posts: 129
Kudos: 144
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
abhimanyu22j
On what ground is D eliminated ?

The argument is based on causation - necessary condition v/s sufficient condition

remove mouse -> program unusable
cause -> effect
(removing mouse is sufficient to cause a program to stop, however program can stop bcoz of other reasons too)

So, there is no generalisation in the argument, Hence D can be eliminated.

Hope this helps.
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,706
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,706
Kudos: 2,329
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Unplugging a peripheral component such as a “mouse” from a personal computer renders all of the software programs that require that component unusable on that computer. On Fred’s personal computer, a software program that requires a mouse has become unusable. So it must be that the mouse for Fred’s computer became unplugged.

The argument is most vulnerable to which one of the following criticisms?

(A) It contains a shift in the meaning of “unusable” from “permanently unusable” to “temporarily unusable.” - WRONG. Irrelevant. No such distinction is possible.

(B) It treats an event that can cause a certain result as though that event is necessary to bring about that result. - CORRECT. See the word 'must' which suggests so.

(C) It introduces information unrelated to its conclusion as evidence in support of that conclusion. - WRONG. Not unrelated but used illogically.

(D) It attempts to support its conclusion by citing a generalization that is too broad. - WRONG. Generalization is fine but why use 'broad'. Aren't the two same? But most importantly had it been about generalization words like 'must' which suggest specificity would not have been used. Thus, 'generalization' and 'broad' are wrongly used as they are going in the opposite direction of passage.

(E) It overlooks the possibility that some programs do not require a peripheral component such as a mouse. - WRONG. Not concerned with programs that don't require component.

Answer B.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
499 posts
358 posts