Hi,
The key phrase is
first real school of new poetry emerging from a
chaos of experimentation.
That wording implies that before 1912, poets were experimenting, but without a clearly defined, organized movement that could be called a school.
Answer A doesn't claim that no poets or collaborations existed earlier, it only says there were no clearly defined movements, which is exactly what chaos of experimentation suggests.
RC inference questions ask what the author’s language most reasonably implies, not what might be hypothetically possible. This is why A) is correct, and E) is a stretch.
Hope this helps!
Vivek1707
I don’t quite agree with the solution. For Q1
In the first para its mentioned that it that "It was not until 1912, however, that the first real school of new poetry emerged from the chaos of experimentation.
and then its mentioend that....
......Ezra Pound created and sustained Imagism by mere declaration.
Between these lines its a stretch to infer that there were no clearly defined movementes before imagism. Its difficult to infer that imagism was the first. Its a possibilty but cant be 100% sure
Additionally, having a school of new poetry doesnt mean that this was the first time any defined movement came into being.
What if there were defined movements but were they died out before getting any traction ?
The passage says it was the first time a school of new poetry emerged.
I can understand that this is the best answer among the lot. Closest answer is E but that I agree is wrong cause 'many movements' is not justified