GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 19 Oct 2019, 16:16

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

V02-30

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58445
V02-30  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Sep 2014, 01:57
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  35% (medium)

Question Stats:

71% (01:44) correct 29% (01:46) wrong based on 31 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

According to a recent publication by the city council, the most cost-effective solution to the problem of congestion on State Highway 1 is to build an elevated roadway above the existing six lanes. This solution makes the most sense because it will save the expense of surveying and breaking new ground for an alternate route, and will also mean that crews will need to construct half as many lanes, since the current lanes will remain in use after the elevated portion is completed.

The conclusion in the passage above is based on which of the following assumptions?


A. That the city council has already approved funding for an elevated roadway above the existing highway.
B. That the cost of surveying and breaking new ground for an alternate route is greater than the difference in cost of constructing an elevated roadway and a normal roadway on the new ground.
C. That the large number of people traveling State Highway 1 every day make easing congestion a priority for the city council.
D. That the city council can not afford to fund the construction of more than six lanes, and so seeks a solution that will require building as few lanes as possible.
E. That drivers on State Highway 1 are unwilling to pay a toll to use the road, and so the city council must provide all funds for improvement.

_________________
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58445
Re V02-30  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Sep 2014, 01:57
Official Solution:


According to a recent publication by the city council, the most cost-effective solution to the problem of congestion on State Highway 1 is to build an elevated roadway above the existing six lanes. This solution makes the most sense because it will save the expense of surveying and breaking new ground for an alternate route, and will also mean that crews will need to construct half as many lanes, since the current lanes will remain in use after the elevated portion is completed.

The conclusion in the passage above is based on which of the following assumptions?


A. That the city council has already approved funding for an elevated roadway above the existing highway.
B. That the cost of surveying and breaking new ground for an alternate route is greater than the difference in cost of constructing an elevated roadway and a normal roadway on the new ground.
C. That the large number of people traveling State Highway 1 every day make easing congestion a priority for the city council.
D. That the city council can not afford to fund the construction of more than six lanes, and so seeks a solution that will require building as few lanes as possible.
E. That drivers on State Highway 1 are unwilling to pay a toll to use the road, and so the city council must provide all funds for improvement.


Situation A city council has recommended an elevated roadway as the most cost-effective solution to a local traffic problem.

Reasoning What assumption is present in the argument supporting this recommendation? The city council believes that surveying and breaking new ground would be the most expensive option, and that constructing new lanes will be more expensive than modifying existing ones. If it could be shown, however, that an elevated roadway will be more expensive than surveying and breaking new ground, the argument would fall apart.
  1. The passage does not say that the council has already approved money for the project.
  2. The city council’s publication presents the elevated roadway plan as a way to avoid the expense of surveying and breaking new ground. The assumption is that those costs would be prohibitive, and that the construction of an elevated roadway would be less expensive.
  3. While priority for the project is implied, the mere fact of its importance does not affect which solution the council recommends.
  4. The passage does not mention explicitly whether or not it can afford to construct a certain number of lanes.
  5. This is outside the scope of the passage, since the question of tolls is never raised directly.

Answer: B
_________________
Current Student
avatar
B
Joined: 19 Jul 2015
Posts: 60
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q51 V35
GPA: 3.69
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: V02-30  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 27 Jul 2016, 11:45
1
Here 's what I feel about choice B.
Let x=cost of surveying and breaking new ground for an alternate route
y=cost of construction on alternate route(without x)
z=cost of constructing an elevated roadway
Now, in the argument it states that elevated highway saves the cost x as it doesn't need to survey and break new ground. But it is not necessary that x<z as choice B states.
Retired Moderator
User avatar
S
Joined: 14 Dec 2013
Posts: 2861
Location: Germany
Schools: German MBA
GMAT 1: 780 Q50 V47
WE: Corporate Finance (Pharmaceuticals and Biotech)
GMAT ToolKit User Reviews Badge
Re: V02-30  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 20 Aug 2016, 10:02
Navinder wrote:
Here 's what I feel about choice B.
Let x=cost of surveying and breaking new ground for an alternate route
y=cost of construction on alternate route(without x)
z=cost of constructing an elevated roadway
Now, in the argument it states that elevated highway saves the cost x as it doesn't need to survey and break new ground. But it is not necessary that x<z as choice B states.


Your point is valid - option B has been modified. Thank you.
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 11 Jun 2018
Posts: 11
Re: V02-30  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Sep 2018, 22:07
Bunuel wrote:
Official Solution:


According to a recent publication by the city council, the most cost-effective solution to the problem of congestion on State Highway 1 is to build an elevated roadway above the existing six lanes. This solution makes the most sense because it will save the expense of surveying and breaking new ground for an alternate route, and will also mean that crews will need to construct half as many lanes, since the current lanes will remain in use after the elevated portion is completed.

The conclusion in the passage above is based on which of the following assumptions?


A. That the city council has already approved funding for an elevated roadway above the existing highway.
B. That the cost of surveying and breaking new ground for an alternate route is greater than the difference in cost of constructing an elevated roadway and a normal roadway on the new ground.
C. That the large number of people traveling State Highway 1 every day make easing congestion a priority for the city council.
D. That the city council can not afford to fund the construction of more than six lanes, and so seeks a solution that will require building as few lanes as possible.
E. That drivers on State Highway 1 are unwilling to pay a toll to use the road, and so the city council must provide all funds for improvement.


Situation A city council has recommended an elevated roadway as the most cost-effective solution to a local traffic problem.

Reasoning What assumption is present in the argument supporting this recommendation? The city council believes that surveying and breaking new ground would be the most expensive option, and that constructing new lanes will be more expensive than modifying existing ones. If it could be shown, however, that an elevated roadway will be more expensive than surveying and breaking new ground, the argument would fall apart.
  1. The passage does not say that the council has already approved money for the project.
  2. The city council’s publication presents the elevated roadway plan as a way to avoid the expense of surveying and breaking new ground. The assumption is that those costs would be prohibitive, and that the construction of an elevated roadway would be less expensive.
  3. While priority for the project is implied, the mere fact of its importance does not affect which solution the council recommends.
  4. The passage does not mention explicitly whether or not it can afford to construct a certain number of lanes.
  5. This is outside the scope of the passage, since the question of tolls is never raised directly.

Answer: B


In option B, why is it the difference between a land road and an elevated road? Shouldn't it be just an elevated road?
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 14 Aug 2012
Posts: 78
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 620 Q43 V33
GMAT 2: 690 Q47 V38
GMAT ToolKit User
Re: V02-30  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 03 Nov 2018, 10:12
B. That the cost of surveying and breaking new ground for an alternate route is greater than the difference in cost of constructing an elevated roadway and a normal roadway on the new ground.

Aren't they comparing an elevated road on the existing highway on existing ground, as opposed to breaking new ground on an alternate route?
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 28 Jan 2019
Posts: 97
Location: India
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GPA: 4
WE: Manufacturing and Production (Manufacturing)
Re: V02-30  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 01 May 2019, 04:59
bpdulog wrote:
B. That the cost of surveying and breaking new ground for an alternate route is greater than the difference in cost of constructing an elevated roadway and a normal roadway on the new ground.

Aren't they comparing an elevated road on the existing highway on existing ground, as opposed to breaking new ground on an alternate route?


My exact doubt! Would be really helpful if someone would explain this.
_________________
"Luck is when preparation meets opportunity!"
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 12 Dec 2017
Posts: 11
CAT Tests
Re: V02-30  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Oct 2019, 00:31
Hi,

Correct option B actually mentioned in the argument as -" it will save the expense of surveying and breaking new ground for an alternate route, and will also mean that crews will need to construct half as many lanes" . How the correct option B is different from what is given in the argument?
GMAT Club Bot
Re: V02-30   [#permalink] 14 Oct 2019, 00:31
Display posts from previous: Sort by

V02-30

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  

Moderators: chetan2u, Bunuel






Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne