Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized for You
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Track Your Progress
every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance
Practice Pays
we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Thank you for using the timer!
We noticed you are actually not timing your practice. Click the START button first next time you use the timer.
There are many benefits to timing your practice, including:
Do RC/MSR passages scare you? e-GMAT is conducting a masterclass to help you learn – Learn effective reading strategies Tackle difficult RC & MSR with confidence Excel in timed test environment
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors.
I started my preparation for GMAT this month. I was reading a news article in International New York Times dated at 13 March 2015 and was not sure about the usage of the tense in the text.
Text :
The Deutsche Bank unit had not planned to transfer any profit or capital to the parent company, and Santander said it had not requested to repatriate profit from US as part of it capital plan.
According to my understanding one should use past perfect (an earlier action) along with a verb in past tense (later action), but the above text doesn't do so.
So I wanted to ask whether the above usage of past perfect is also acceptable?
Regards, Vipul
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block below for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.
It is possible that both of these past tense events happened before some earlier event that is discussed in some other sentence. As far as the GMAT is concerned, the only justifiable use of the past perfect is with a simple past tense event or a time marker.
Does that mean we can have the past perfect verb and the simple past tense verb in two different sentences?
I thought it must be in the same sentence.
Kind Regards, Vipul
Show more
Hi,
In case of news articles, it is possible to have the past perfect verb and the simple past tense verb in two different sentences because the article talks about so many different things. However, in case of GMAT SC, you won't know if there are two actions or not unless specified in the sentence for you. So, in GMAT always use past perfect when you have two events specified.
That is why it's a bit difficult sometimes to apply the GMAT sentence correction rules to real life writing. Since the GMAT is only a single sentence, the requirements for proper grammar must be met within the sentence, but that is not true of English as a whole. Another good example of this is pronoun usage. On the GMAT, we must have an antecedent for the pronoun WITHIN the sentence, but in real life antecedents are established and can carry for several sentences or even paragraphs.
KW
Archived Topic
Hi there,
This topic has been closed and archived due to inactivity or violation of community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Where to now? Join ongoing discussions on thousands of quality questions in our Verbal Questions Forum
Still interested in this question? Check out the "Best Topics" block above for a better discussion on this exact question, as well as several more related questions.