Neuroscientists of today, unlike 30 years ago, have access to sophisti

Question

Project SC Butler: Sentence Correction (SC2) 
 For SC butler Questions  Click Here

Neuroscientists of today, unlike 30 years ago,  have access to sophisticated instrumentation that has only become possible as a result of recent technological advances.

A) Neuroscientists of today, unlike 30 years ago,

B) Today’s neuroscientists, unlike those of 30 years ago,

C) Neuroscientists who are conducting research today, unlike 30 years ago,

D) Neuroscientists conducting research today, in contrast to 30 years ago,

E) Neuroscientists who conduct research today, differing from that of 30 years ago,

generis · Answer

OFFICIAL EXPLANATION

THE PROMPT  
 
•  unlike  is similar to  like.  
→ unlike is a preposition that must be followed by a noun 
→ whatever follows  unlike  is being compared to (contrasted with) something else
→ be sure that similar things are being compared
• in this case, we want to compare neuroscientists of today and neuroscientists of 30 years ago

THE OPTIONS  
 
• on the RHS of  unlike  is  30 years ago .
→ on the LHS of the comparison we should be reading about some other time period. We are not doing so. We are reading about neuroscientists  .
• the option thus improperly compares  neuroscientists  (people) with 30 years ago (a time period)
Eliminate A
 
• on the RHS of  unlike  we have  those,  which correctly refers to neuroscientists (today's neuroscientists)
• this option compares contemporary neuroscientists to not-contemporary neuroscientists. The contrast is parallel.
KEEP B
 
• on the RHS of unlike is  30 years ago,  a time period
• do not be fooled by  today  in this option (or in A): the main noun is  neuroscientists.  
→ Once again,  neuroscientists  are incorrectly compared with  30 years ago . Not a parallel contrast.
Eliminate C
 
•  in contrast to  is a prepositional phrase that means  unlike. 
• once against,  30 years ago  is incorrectly contrasted with  neuroscientists   
Eliminate D
 
• prepositional  from  must be and is followed by a noun:  that 
• In this case,  from  is followed by  that,  but
-- we do not use  that  to refer to people
--  that  is singular and cannot agree with the plural  neuroscientists,  whose pronoun is  those 
• differing is a participle (a verbING), and probably implies some  continuing  difference

Eliminate E

The best answer is B.

COMMENTS

saurabh851  ,  hsingh3030  , and  dracarys007  , welcome to SC Butler.

I am always pleased when new people post.
It encourages others to join.
Little communities of people are oases in what can sometimes seem like chaos at the moment.

The veterans and occasional visitors are always welcome, too. You all keep the threads going.
 tyildirim92  , I like your reference to  Greta Thunberg. 
She is passionate, articulate, and feisty.

I happen to like such qualities.

Most of these answers are very good. Kudos to all.

saurabh851 · Answer

ANS: B

A) Neuroscientists of today, unlike 30 years ago,
 Wrong comparison of Neuroscientists with 30 years ago

B) Today’s neuroscientists, unlike those of 30 years ago,
 OK..

C) Neuroscientists who are conducting research today, unlike 30 years ago,
 Wrong comparison of Neuroscientists with 30 years ago

D) Neuroscientists conducting research today, in contrast to 30 years ago,
 Wrong comparison

E) Neuroscientists who conduct research today, differing from that of 30 years ago,
 Awkward

Hope it is correct...

sambitspm · Answer

Neuroscientists of today, unlike 30 years ago , have access to sophisticated instrumentation that has only become possible as a result of recent technological advances.

We are comparing the neuroscientists of today and of 30 years ago.

A) Neuroscientist s of today, unlike 30 years ago , Wrong comparison 
 
B) Today’s neuroscientists, unlike those of 30 years ago,

C) Neuroscientists who are conducting research today, unlike 30 years ago,  the Wrong comparison. Not comparing research.

D) Neuroscientists conducting  research today, in contrast to  30 years ago,  the Wrong comparison. Not comparing time.

E) Neuroscientists who conduct  research today, differing from that of 30 years ago ,  the Wrong comparison. Not comparing research.

chaitralirr · Answer

Neuroscientists of today, unlike 30 years ago , have access to sophisticated instrumentation that has only become possible as a result of recent technological advances.

Comparsion tested. Neuroscientists unlike Neuroscientists 30 years ago have access.

In all options except B the comparison is incorrect neuroscientist should be compared to neuroscientists 30 years ago not the time period. 
the Unlike those is correctly used. IMO B

A) Neuroscientists of today, unlike 30 years ago,

B) Today’s neuroscientists, unlike those of 30 years ago,

C) Neuroscientists who are conducting research today, unlike 30 years ago,

D) Neuroscientists conducting research today, in contrast to 30 years ago,

E) Neuroscientists who conduct research today, differing from that of 30 years ago,

dracarys007 · Answer

A humble request – Please give KUDOS if you like the response.
Let us first dissect the sentence.
Neuroscientists of today,
unlike 30 years ago, - We are comparing Neuroscientists
have access to sophisticated instrumentation that has only become possible as a result of recent technological advances.
Neuroscientists… have access to … - SV pair is correct. 
That is used as an article here.

A) Neuroscientists of today, unlike 30 years ago,
Here we are comparing Neuroscientists with 30 years ago.

B) Today’s neuroscientists, unlike those of 30 years ago,
This is the correct comparison.

C) Neuroscientists who are conducting research today, unlike 30 years ago,
Here we are comparing Neuroscientists with 30 years ago.

If you are still reading my post please hit the KUDOS button.

D) Neuroscientists conducting research today, in contrast to 30 years ago,
Here we are comparing Neuroscientists with 30 years ago.

E) Neuroscientists who conduct research today, differing from that of 30 years ago,
That of is incorrect usage. It should be those of.
Thank you for reading the post. Request you to please hit the KUDOS button.
Answer is B.

youggotthis95 · Answer

Neuroscientists of today, unlike 30 years ago, have access to sophisticated instrumentation that has only become possible as a result of recent technological advances.

A) Neuroscientists of today, unlike 30 years ago,
- X like Y should be comparing two nouns. However, it seems we are comparing neuroscientists with a time period of 30 years ago. INCORRECT.

B) Today’s neuroscientists, unlike those of 30 years ago,
- Well this solves the problem in option A. Scientists are rightly compared to "those" of 30 years ago. Those here correctly refers to today's scientists.

C) Neuroscientists who are conducting research today, unlike 30 years ago,
- If you got the issue with option A, this will be easy to eliminate.

D) Neuroscientists conducting research today, in contrast to 30 years ago,
- Same as C.

E) Neuroscientists who conduct research today, differing from that of 30 years ago,
- Same as C.

Note: If you got this question incorrect, just revise the use of "like" and "as" and maybe your concept will be clear.

Good luck!

NiftyNiffler · Answer

Neuroscientists of today, unlike 30 years ago,  have access to sophisticated instrumentation that has only become possible as a result of recent technological advances.

A) Neuroscientists of today, unlike 30 years ago,  -- Comparing Neuroscientists to an year 30 years ago WRONG

B) Today’s neuroscientists, unlike those of 30 years ago,  -- CORRECT, comparison of neuroscientists from two different time periods

C) Neuroscientists who are conducting research today, unlike 30 years ago,  -- Makes it seem like we are talking about same set of neuroscientists from different times
 
D) Neuroscientists conducting research today, in contrast to 30 years ago,  -- same as C

E) Neuroscientists who conduct research today, differing from that of 30 years ago,  -- wordy and awkward. "that" is used to refer to plural neuroscientists

So, answer should be  B

jaisonsunny77 · Answer

Neuroscientists of today, unlike 30 years ago , have access to sophisticated instrumentation that has only become possible as a result of recent technological advances. 
 
A) Neuroscientists of today, unlike 30 years ago,  -  has a comparison error: Neuroscientists are being compared to ''30 years''. 
 
B) Today’s neuroscientists, unlike those of 30 years ago, - has no error. Hence,    (B) is the right answer choice.    
 
C) Neuroscientists who are conducting research today, unlike 30 years ago,  -  has the same error as described in (C). 
  
D) Neuroscientists conducting research today, in contrast to 30 years ago,  -  does not clearly indicate what is being compared (or contrasted)
  
E) Neuroscientists who conduct research today, differing from that of 30 years ago,  -  with the use of ''that'' (Which refers to ''research''), (E) effectively compares ''Neuroscientists'' with ''research''; This comparison is illogical.

hsingh3031 · Answer

B is the answer.

We are comparing neuroscientist of today with neuroscientist of 30 years ago . So B gives ''those of 30 years ago" where those refers to neuroscientist 30 years back. Gives better comparison between Neuroscientists.

tyildirim92 · Answer

Neuroscientists of today, unlike 30 years ago,  have access to sophisticated instrumentation that has only become possible as a result of recent technological advances.

A) Neuroscientists of today, unlike 30 years ago,  // let's remember Greta Thunberg's speech. how dare you to compare neuroscientists with 30 years ago? Neuroscientists are human, 30 years ago is a time indicator.

B) Today’s neuroscientists, unlike those of 30 years ago,  // sounds perfect!

C) Neuroscientists who are conducting research today, unlike 30 years ago,  // let's remember Greta Thunberg's speech. how dare you to compare neuroscientists with 30 years ago? Neuroscientists are human, 30 years ago is a time indicator.

D) Neuroscientists conducting research today, in contrast to 30 years ago,  // let's remember Greta Thunberg's speech. how dare you to compare neuroscientists with 30 years ago? Neuroscientists are human, 30 years ago is a time indicator.

E) Neuroscientists who conduct research today, differing from that of 30 years ago,  // those should be used instead of that. Neuroscientists are plural. Furthermore, I would prefer to use "different from" rather than "differing from".

monk123 · Answer

Neuroscientists of today, unlike 30 years ago , have access to sophisticated instrumentation that has only become possible as a result of recent technological advances.
 
POE:
Stop sign- unlike; search for comparison.
Here, the comparison is between the neuroscientist of today and neuroscientists of 30 years ago.
Eliminate (A), (C) - comparison error.
Eliminate (D), (E) - comparison error plus wordy.

A) Neuroscientists of today,  unlike 30 years ago,
 
B) Today’s neuroscientists, unlike those of 30 years ago, -   CORRECT

C)  Neuroscientists  who are conducting research today,  unlike 30 years ago ,

D)  Neuroscientists  conducting research today,  in contrast to 30 years ago ,

E)  Neuroscientists  who conduct research today,  differing from that of 30 years ago,

vipulshahi · Answer

Neuroscientists of today, unlike 30 years ago,  have access to sophisticated instrumentation that has only become possible as a result of recent technological advances.

Lets analyze each & every part of the sentence.

* Subject Verb Agreement   
-All subjects have verb pair and makes sense. Correct.

* Tense Form   
- present tense used and conveyed the intended meaning.

* If-then condition  - not used

* Subjunctive Verb  - not used

* Pronoun   
-pronoun has logical antecedent. Correct.

* Modifier  - not used

* Parallelism  - not used

* Comparison    
 - today is comparing with "30 years ago" but it didn't make any sense. Incorrect.
 
 * Idioms   
- idioms used correctly.

While analyzing the sentence, only   comparison error   is identified.
 
A) Neuroscientists of   today, unlike 30 years ago  ,
 
- Comparison error;

- Incorrect
 
B) Today’s neuroscientists, unlike those of 30 years ago,
 
- removes the comparison error while using of " those of",it compares today's neuroscientist to neuroscientist of 30 years back .

- Correct
 
C) Neuroscientists who are conducting research   today, unlike 30 years ago,

- Comparison error;

- Incorrect

D) Neuroscientists conducting research   today, in contrast to 30 years ago ,

- Comparison error;

- Incorrect

E) Neuroscientists who conduct research   today, differing from that of 30 years ago,

- "differing from that of 30 years ago" modifying "who conduct research" which changed the intended meaning of the sentence.

- Incorrect

IMO(B)

generis · Answer

The official explanation is  here.

Neuroscientists of today, unlike 30 years ago, have access to sophisti

Prep Toolkit

Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards

GMAT Sentence Correction (SC - EA only) Questions

Neuroscientists of today, unlike 30 years ago, have access to sophisti

Prep Toolkit

615 to 715 in 15 Days (Ria's Strategies)

More than Quant/Verbal Abilities: Speed vs. Accuracy

745 with Only Self-Prep and GMAT Club

From 555 to 765: 210-point Improvement

Perfect 805 Score Debrief by Julia

My Rewards