Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 14:48 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 14:48
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
maheshsrini
Joined: 10 Jan 2010
Last visit: 06 Aug 2015
Posts: 75
Own Kudos:
619
 [21]
Given Kudos: 33
GPA: 4
WE:Programming (Computer Software)
Posts: 75
Kudos: 619
 [21]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
17
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Most Helpful Reply
User avatar
ChrisLele
User avatar
Magoosh GMAT Instructor
Joined: 28 Nov 2011
Last visit: 27 Jul 2020
Posts: 295
Own Kudos:
4,843
 [9]
Given Kudos: 2
Expert
Expert reply
Posts: 295
Kudos: 4,843
 [9]
9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
General Discussion
User avatar
chesstitans
Joined: 12 Dec 2016
Last visit: 20 Nov 2019
Posts: 963
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 2,561
Location: United States
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
GPA: 3.64
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V33
Posts: 963
Kudos: 1,936
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Yellkrishna
Joined: 12 Dec 2019
Last visit: 21 Apr 2021
Posts: 53
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 33
Posts: 53
Kudos: 42
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A. No. Quite the opposite. With changing geopolitics, the argument says that the public now might not support the defence budget.

B. The threat in the past is the cause for high defence budget, lack of that threat is now the cause for perceived lack of support. So no.

C. The argument seeks to establish that public might not support the size of the defence budget. It does not presuppose this conclusion as fact.

D. The conclusion is that there might not be support for an adequate defence budget. It gives some reasons for it. So no.

E. The term adequate is not defined properly in the argument. How much less it adequate? 90% or only 10%. If that is evaluated, then the argument gets more clear. So E.

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,424
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,424
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
504 posts
358 posts