Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2301:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Struggling with GMAT Verbal as a non-native speaker? Harsh improved his score from 595 to 695 in just 45 days—and scored a 99 %ile in Verbal (V88)! Learn how smart strategy, clarity, and guided prep helped him gain 100 points.
Apr 2308:00 PM PDT
-09:00 PM PDT
Video explanations + diagnosis of 10 weakest areas + 150+ short videos + study plan!
Apr 2212:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
15 Sep 2015, 14:59
Kudos
Bookmarks
C
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
65%
(hard)
Question Stats:
51% (01:37) correct
49%
(01:35)
wrong
based on 417
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Many courses in the high school syllabus are the result of outdated pedagogical prescriptions. Subjects such as geography and advanced mathematics are a mandatory part of the curriculum, whereas courses with pragmatic value, such as home science, are classified under electives and thus rarely chosen by students.
Which of the following conclusions can be derived from this information?
A. Students take courses such as geography and advanced mathematics only because they are required courses.
B. Home science is the most useful course that high school students can take.
C. Home science should be considered more important than it currently is.
D. Courses that do not have practical value should not be a part of the high school curriculum.
E. High schools must give more importance to subjects that are not academic in nature.
A- Not mentioned
B - Home science is mentioned as an example of a pragmatic course.
C- Same as B
D - Too strong statement and out of scope
E - Correct.
E seems to be correct option. Is anyone thinking differently?
Which of the following conclusions can be derived from this information?
A. Students take courses such as geography and advanced mathematics only because they are required courses.
B. Home science is the most useful course that high school students can take.
C. Home science should be considered more important than it currently is.
D. Courses that do not have practical value should not be a part of the high school curriculum.
E. High schools must give more importance to subjects that are not academic in nature.
A- Not mentioned
B - Home science is mentioned as an example of a pragmatic course.
C- Same as B
D - Too strong statement and out of scope
E - Correct.
E seems to be correct option. Is anyone thinking differently?
15 Sep 2015, 15:29
Kudos
Bookmarks
PerptualKnite56
Dear PerptualKnite56,
I'm happy to respond.
What is the source of this question? It doesn't have the feel of a GMAT CR question. Was the a question from some other test? Among other things, the perspective in the prompt is antiquated, at least in the USA. I don't think Geography has been part of the curriculum for half a century! Let's look at the answers:
(A) Students take courses such as geography and advanced mathematics only because they are required courses.
We don't know. We know students must take these, but if they weren't required, would students elect to take them? We don't know.
(B) Home science is the most useful course that high school students can take.
Far too extreme. The author things that home science is somewhat important, but not necessarily the "most useful." Extremely language is never correct.
(C) Home science should be considered more important than it currently is.
Right now, it appears that home science is not considered important at all, and the author cites it as something that has value. Therefore, it should be more important then it currently is. This is a quite reasonable inference.
(D) Courses that do not have practical value should not be a part of the high school curriculum.
This contradicts the authors argument.
(E) High schools must give more importance to subjects that are not academic in nature.
Hmmm. Is home science not an academic subject? This is not clear from the prompt. It's a little unclear what is meant by that course title, and it's hard to generalize, because that's the only example that the author gives of a course that should be given more prominence.
I don't think this is a particularly GMAT-like question, but I do agree with their OA.
Does all this make sense?
Mike
mvictor
Board of Directors
Joined: 17 Jul 2014
Last visit: 14 Jul 2021
Posts: 2,118
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 236
Location: United States (IL)
Concentration: Finance, Economics
Schools: Stanford '20 (WD)
GMAT 1: 650 Q49 V30
GPA: 3.92
WE:General Management (Transportation)
Products:
13 Apr 2016, 18:52
Kudos
Bookmarks
PerptualKnite56
I picked C, as it is the most neutral and written in the language similar to that in the argument.
A - goes into extremities...
B - again extremities
C - looks good
D - again extremities
E - but does a non-academic subject have a pragmatic value? don't know.. so E is not good
