Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Sep 1507:00 PM EDT
-09:00 PM EST
Elite scores are possible when you enroll in a powerful GMAT course, taught live online + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Tues/Thurs Sept. 15, 2026 - Nov. 15, 2027, 7:00pm-9:00pm EST
Sep 2107:00 PM EDT
-10:00 PM EDT
Boost your GMAT score in less than one month in a live online class + 6 months access to TTP OnDemand video courses included! Class starts Mon, Tues, Wed, Thur, Fri Sept. 21, 2026 - Oct. 9, 2027, 7:00pm-10:00pm EST
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
35%
(medium)
Question Stats:
66% (01:11) correct
34%
(01:30)
wrong
based on 742
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
Compared to us, people who lived a century ago had very few diversions to amuse them. Therefore they likely read much more than we do today.
Which of the following statements, if true, most weakens the argument?
A. Many of the books published a century ago were of low literary quality.
B. On average, people who lived a century ago had considerably less leisure time than we do today.
C. The number of books sold today is larger than it was a century ago.
D. On the average, books today cost slightly less is relation to other goods than they did a century ago.
E. One of the popular diversions of a century ago was horse racing.
Which of the following statements, if true, most weakens the argument?
A. Many of the books published a century ago were of low literary quality.
B. On average, people who lived a century ago had considerably less leisure time than we do today.
C. The number of books sold today is larger than it was a century ago.
D. On the average, books today cost slightly less is relation to other goods than they did a century ago.
E. One of the popular diversions of a century ago was horse racing.
looks like B...let me try to explain
A - quality is irrelevant
B- only if people have leisure time, they will read more,,,what if they dnt have leisure time... clearly weakens.
C- number is irrelevant
D - cost is also out of scope
E- looks convincing,,but less convincing than B
A - quality is irrelevant
B- only if people have leisure time, they will read more,,,what if they dnt have leisure time... clearly weakens.
C- number is irrelevant
D - cost is also out of scope
E- looks convincing,,but less convincing than B
Posts: 1,142
Main argument is that: people in past likely read much more Because they had very few diversions to amuse them in comparison to today.
A - eliminated because argument doesn't mention anything about quality of books effecting the reading.
C - just because more books are sold today, doesn't mean that people today read more. Population today is much more than it was 100 years ago, so this point is refuted.
D - eliminated because the author doesn't mention 'cost of reading' being a valid cause. This is about having a diversion or amusement, not related to the cost of the diversion
E - even if horse racing was popular back then so what? That is just one diversion of the past, but we don't know whether there were many more diversions then or not. Eliminated
Only B seems correct, because if people back then had considerably less leisure time than we have today, then they were less likely to engage in their available diversions - whether those be reading or something else. Hence B answer
A - eliminated because argument doesn't mention anything about quality of books effecting the reading.
C - just because more books are sold today, doesn't mean that people today read more. Population today is much more than it was 100 years ago, so this point is refuted.
D - eliminated because the author doesn't mention 'cost of reading' being a valid cause. This is about having a diversion or amusement, not related to the cost of the diversion
E - even if horse racing was popular back then so what? That is just one diversion of the past, but we don't know whether there were many more diversions then or not. Eliminated
Only B seems correct, because if people back then had considerably less leisure time than we have today, then they were less likely to engage in their available diversions - whether those be reading or something else. Hence B answer
goforgmat
Joined: 09 Feb 2015
Last visit: 02 Nov 2019
Posts: 235
Location: India
Concentration: Social Entrepreneurship, General Management
Schools: Booth '21 (D) Cambridge "21 (D) LBS '22 (D)
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V34
GMAT 2: 720 Q49 V39
GPA: 2.8
Products:
vikasp99
the correlation between leisure time and reading for amusement isnt given straightaway. Even if they had less leisure time ,they could have read more than we do today. There isnt a better answer but i feel this question isn't a sound one. Experts Please let me know your thoughts on this one.
goforgmat - Yup I agree with you. B doesn't seem right to me as well
Prateek176
Joined: 12 Mar 2017
Last visit: 10 Jun 2021
Posts: 171
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: ISB '21 (D) IIMC MBAEx "21 (WL)
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V37
GPA: 4
amanvermagmat
amanvermagmat How can we assume that population today is much more? Moreover if they had less leisure time then probably they would have been less likely to engage not only in other diversions but also in reading. Can anyone please clarify this?
Abhishek009
Board of Directors
Joined: 11 Jun 2011
Last visit: 17 Dec 2025
Posts: 5,880
Status:QA & VA Forum Moderator
Location: India
GPA: 3.5
WE:Business Development (Commercial Banking)
Posts: 5,880
vikasp99
Few diversions to amuse = More opportunity to read book.
(A) , (C) and (D) are clearly out of scope for the highlighted reasons...
(E) Talks about popular diversion as horse-riding which is one of the few Diversions available to people a century ago.
Only (B) weakens the argument by stating that fewer amusements were not responsible for more reading habit, further it suggests that people were genuinely Interested in reading despite less leisure time available to them than we have now....
_________________
Prateek176
Joined: 12 Mar 2017
Last visit: 10 Jun 2021
Posts: 171
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, General Management
Schools: ISB '21 (D) IIMC MBAEx "21 (WL)
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V37
GPA: 4
Abhishek009
Abhishek009 Still didn't understand why C is out of scope. If The number of books sold earlier was less than that sold a century earlier, doesn't it mean that people read less earlier??
I perfectly understand why B is a weakener but i am still not fully convinced with C as a wrong choice. A lil help!!!
prateek176
Maybe I can help...
The number of books sold does not necessarily tell us anything about how much people read.
- Maybe a century ago most people got their books for free from libraries or borrowed books from friends.
- Just because you BUY a lot of books does not necessarily mean that you read a lot. Maybe you bought the books to give them as gifts or bought them and never read them.
- Maybe book sales have increased only because population has increased. The average number of book purchases per person might be the same now as it was a century ago (or even less!). If population has grown, the number of book sales would be higher today.
Increased book sales do not necessarily imply increased reading frequency. Eliminate choice (C).
I hope that helps!
_________________
GMAT/GRE/EA tutors @ www.gmatninja.com | YouTube | Articles | IG
Beginners' Guides: RC | CR | Complete Resource Compilations: RC | CR
YouTube LIVE webinars: all videos by topic + 24-hour marathon for Ukraine
Question Explanation Collections: RC | CR | SC
Beginners' Guides: RC | CR | Complete Resource Compilations: RC | CR
YouTube LIVE webinars: all videos by topic + 24-hour marathon for Ukraine
Question Explanation Collections: RC | CR | SC
1920-less diversion for entertainment, more reading
2020-more diversion, less reading
How to Weaken this?
Only if we know that not bcz of less diversion but bcz they get less leisure time and in that one could read a book.
For example, if in
1920-30 min leisure time
One can read a book
2020-120 min ,one can surely visit mall ,cinema halls etc which one can't do in 30 min.
Hope it helps
Posted from my mobile device
2020-more diversion, less reading
How to Weaken this?
Only if we know that not bcz of less diversion but bcz they get less leisure time and in that one could read a book.
For example, if in
1920-30 min leisure time
One can read a book
2020-120 min ,one can surely visit mall ,cinema halls etc which one can't do in 30 min.
Hope it helps
Posted from my mobile device
I got confused in selecting the most apt one in this.
For B, much leisure time may or may not corresponds to much reading.
It may be that out of the less time that people of last century spends more time in reading than the time people of today's generation will read in much leisure time.
Hence, i was confused
Posted from my mobile device
For B, much leisure time may or may not corresponds to much reading.
It may be that out of the less time that people of last century spends more time in reading than the time people of today's generation will read in much leisure time.
Hence, i was confused
Posted from my mobile device
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:
A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.
This post was generated automatically.
_________________
A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.
This post was generated automatically.
_________________
Moderators:
Announcements
How to Tell If Your GMAT Prep Resources Are Actually Helping You
Subscribe to GMAT Club for New Podcast Episodes, Debriefs, & Insightful Sessions on GMAT Preparation
Subscribe to GMAT Club for New Podcast Episodes, Debriefs, & Insightful Sessions on GMAT Preparation
Tuck at Dartmouth
AI at Dartmouth Tuck: How the School Is Preparing Leaders for the Age of Artificial Intelligence
Inside the courses, research, and hands-on learning defining wise, decisive leadership in an AI-driven world.
Read More
Inside the courses, research, and hands-on learning defining wise, decisive leadership in an AI-driven world.
Read More
Top 5 GMAT Debrief Videos
Success stories and strategies from high-scoring candidates.