Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 10:02 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 10:02
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
avatar
aurobindomahanty
Joined: 30 Apr 2016
Last visit: 03 Apr 2019
Posts: 66
Own Kudos:
855
 [28]
Given Kudos: 56
Location: India
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
GPA: 4
Products:
GMAT 1: 720 Q50 V38
Posts: 66
Kudos: 855
 [28]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
27
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
deep14
Joined: 21 Nov 2014
Last visit: 03 May 2019
Posts: 32
Own Kudos:
42
 [2]
Given Kudos: 16
Location: India
Schools: ISB '18
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
GPA: 3.7
Schools: ISB '18
GMAT 1: 710 Q49 V38
Posts: 32
Kudos: 42
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
AbdurRakib
Joined: 11 May 2014
Last visit: 03 Mar 2026
Posts: 464
Own Kudos:
43,747
 [2]
Given Kudos: 220
Status:I don't stop when I'm Tired,I stop when I'm done
Location: Bangladesh
Concentration: Finance, Leadership
GPA: 2.81
WE:Business Development (Real Estate)
Posts: 464
Kudos: 43,747
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
adityapareshshah
Joined: 17 Apr 2016
Last visit: 14 Nov 2017
Posts: 59
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 254
Posts: 59
Kudos: 46
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hey Experts,

Didn't quiet understand the question and the answer. Please explain.
avatar
Ravindra.here
Joined: 15 Aug 2015
Last visit: 08 May 2020
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
49
 [2]
Given Kudos: 334
Location: India
Schools: LBS '18 ISB '19
GMAT 1: 610 Q48 V26
GPA: 3.21
Schools: LBS '18 ISB '19
GMAT 1: 610 Q48 V26
Posts: 34
Kudos: 49
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
aurobindomahanty
Rifka: We do not need to stop and ask for directions. We would not need to do that unless, of course, we were lost.
Craig: The fact that we are lost is precisely why we need to stop.
In the exchange above, the function of Craig’s comment is to

(A) contradict the conclusion of Rifka’s argument without offering any reason to reject any of Rifka’s implicit premises
(B) deny one of Rifka’s implicit premises and thereby arrive at a different conclusion
(C) imply that Rifka’s argument is invalid by accepting the truth of its premises while rejecting its conclusion
(D) provide a counterexample to Rifka’s generalization
(E) affirm the truth of the stated premise of Rifka’s argument while remaining noncommittal about its conclusion

A nice question on conditional Reasoning
I got it wrong in my attempt.
UNLESS INTRODUCES A NECESSARY CONDITION
therefore, If i write the rifika's conclusionWe would not need to do that unless, of course, we were lost in sufficient condition and necessary condition form it will be ((( I will choose if , then indicators to be more precise))

IF we need to stop and ask for directions, then we are lost-------1

A contrapositive (( correct reversal )) of this statement will be
IF we are not lost , then we do not need to stop and ask for directions------2

Coming to Craig's Conclusion The fact that we are lost is precisely why we need to stop.

Compare this to 1 and 2 we find no similarities

Infact this is the wrong negation of the statement 2
Option b says that deny one of Rifka’s implicit premises and thereby arrive at a different conclusion
Craig is coming to a different conclusion by using mistaken reversal of statement 2. Also he is acting against the premise of rifika we do not need to stop and ask for directions .
avatar
Ravindra.here
Joined: 15 Aug 2015
Last visit: 08 May 2020
Posts: 34
Own Kudos:
49
 [2]
Given Kudos: 334
Location: India
Schools: LBS '18 ISB '19
GMAT 1: 610 Q48 V26
GPA: 3.21
Schools: LBS '18 ISB '19
GMAT 1: 610 Q48 V26
Posts: 34
Kudos: 49
 [2]
Kudos
Add Kudos
2
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
AbdurRakib
aurobindomahanty
Rifka: We do not need to stop and ask for directions. We would not need to do that unless, of course, we were lost.
Craig: The fact that we are lost is precisely why we need to stop.
In the exchange above, the function of Craig’s comment is to

(A) contradict the conclusion of Rifka’s argument without offering any reason to reject any of Rifka’s implicit premises
(B) deny one of Rifka’s implicit premises and thereby arrive at a different conclusion
(C) imply that Rifka’s argument is invalid by accepting the truth of its premises while rejecting its conclusion
(D) provide a counterexample to Rifka’s generalization
(E) affirm the truth of the stated premise of Rifka’s argument while remaining noncommittal about its conclusion


Rifka: We do not need to stop and ask for directions. We would not need to do that unless, of course, we were lost.
Craig: The fact that we are lost is precisely why we need to stop.
In the exchange above, the function of Craig’s comment is to


Rifka: If lost ,then stop and ask
Craig:If lost ,then stop

(A) contradict the conclusion of Rifka’s argument without offering any reason to reject any of Rifka’s implicit premises
(B) deny one of Rifka’s implicit premises and thereby arrive at a different conclusion
(C) imply that Rifka’s argument is invalid by accepting the truth of its premises while rejecting its conclusion
(D) provide a counterexample to Rifka’s generalization
(E) affirm the truth of the stated premise of Rifka’s argument while remaining noncommittal about its conclusion

AbdurRakib
Hi AbdurRakib
Though you arrived at the right answer , the form of conditional reasoning you used is wrong
Unless introduces a necessary condition
IF introduces a sufficient condition , then introduces a necessary condition
To find a conditional indicator such as UNLESS we need to write the part before UNLESS BY removing not, as sufficient
condition and the part with UNLESS ,becomes the necessary condition

therefore, If i write the rifika's conclusion
We would not need to do that unless, of course, we were lost in sufficient condition and necessary condition form it will be ((( if , then indicators))

IF we need to stop and ask for directions, then we are lost-------1

A contrapositive (( correct reversal )) of this statement will be
IF we are not lost , then we do not need to stop and ask for directions------2

What you wrote as reasoning is mistaken reversal
Please correct me if i am wrong.
User avatar
lichting
Joined: 17 Sep 2017
Last visit: 10 Sep 2019
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 168
Posts: 36
Kudos: 52
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can anyone please explain the correct answer please? I still do not understand
User avatar
poorvi125
Joined: 08 Jun 2022
Last visit: 04 Feb 2024
Posts: 39
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 592
Posts: 39
Kudos: 8
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
What an incredible question in a dire need of an expert explanation.

GMATNinja

Please step in :)

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
DrAnkita91
Joined: 29 Aug 2022
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 58
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 93
Posts: 58
Kudos: 21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
can someone please tell the difference between option b and c?? why is option B better?
User avatar
HarshavardhanR
Joined: 16 Mar 2023
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 488
Own Kudos:
576
 [1]
Given Kudos: 67
Status:Independent GMAT Tutor
Affiliations: Ex - Director, Subject Matter Expertise at e-GMAT
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 488
Kudos: 576
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
DrAnkita91
can someone please tell the difference between option b and c?? why is option B better?
­Hey @DrAnkita91

Let me try to help!

Rifka's argument:
Conclusion -> We do not need to stop and ask for directions.
Reasoning -> We would not need to stop and ask for directions unless we were actually lost.
Implicit premise -> We are not actually lost.
Understanding the Logical play -> If we were actually lost, then, yes, we would need to stop and ask for directions. But we are not actually lost (implicit). So, we do not need to stop and ask for directions (conclusion).

Craig's counter:
The fact that we are lost is precisely why we need to stop.

Rifka's implicitly considers that they are not lost. Craig denies the truth of this. He states as a fact that they are lost. Based on his outright denial of Rifka's implicit premise, Craig arrives at a different conclusion to Rifka's ("we need to stop" vs. "we do not need to stop").

Hope you see why choice B is correct.

The issue with choice C -> While Craig does reject Rifka's conclusion, he does not accept the truth of Rifka's premises. As we have seen, Craig denies the truth of Rifka's implicit premise. The issue with choice C is "by accepting the truth of its premises". Not true.

Hope this helps!
___
Harsha
Enthu about all things GMAT | Exploring the GMAT space | My website: gmatanchor.com
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,423
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,423
Kudos: 1,009
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
501 posts
358 posts