Events & Promotions
|
|
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.
Customized
for You
Track
Your Progress
Practice
Pays
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Apr 2512:30 AM EDT
-01:30 AM EDT
At one point, she believed GMAT wasn’t for her. After scoring 595, self-doubt crept in and she questioned her potential. But instead of quitting, she made the right strategic changes. The result? A remarkable comeback to 695. Check out how Saakshi did it.
Apr 2601:30 AM EDT
-02:30 AM EDT
Learn how Keshav, a Chartered Accountant, scored an impressive 705 on GMAT in just 30 days with GMATWhiz's expert guidance. In this video, he shares preparation tips and strategies that worked for him, including the mock, time management, and more.
Apr 2610:00 AM EDT
-11:00 AM EDT
The Target Test Prep course represents a quantum leap forward in GMAT preparation, a radical reinterpretation of the way that students should study. Try before you buy with a 5-day, full-access trial of the course for FREE!
Apr 2711:00 AM EDT
-12:00 PM EDT
Prefer video-based learning? The Target Test Prep OnDemand course is a one-of-a-kind video masterclass featuring 400 hours of lecture-style teaching by Scott Woodbury-Stewart, founder of Target Test Prep and one of the most accomplished GMAT instructors
Apr 2808:00 AM PDT
-11:00 AM PDT
Whether you are just beginning your MBA journey or fine-tuning your path to a 700+ score, GMAT Day is designed to give you a competitive edge.
May 0111:00 AM PDT
-12:00 PM PDT
Free- full-length test + 15 concept videos + 150+ short videos + study plan!
31 Jul 2016, 02:38
Kudos
Bookmarks
A
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!
Difficulty:
55%
(hard)
Question Stats:
67% (02:04) correct
33%
(02:24)
wrong
based on 1192
sessions
History
Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
In order to reduce traffic congestion and raise revenue for the city, the mayor plans to implement a charge of $10 per day for driving in the downtown area. Payment of this charge will be enforced using a highly sophisticated system that employs digital cameras and computerized automobile registration. This system will not be ready until the end of next year. Without this system, however, mass evasion of the charge will result. Therefore, when the mayor’s plan is first implemented, payment of the charge will not be effectively enforced.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends for its conclusion to be properly drawn?
(A) The mayor’s plan to charge for driving downtown will be implemented before the end of next year.
(B) The city will incur a budget deficit if it does not receive the revenue it expects to raise from the charge for driving downtown.
(C) The plan to charge for driving downtown should be implemented as soon as payment of the charge can be effectively enforced.
(D) Raising revenue is a more important consideration for the city than is reducing traffic congestion.
(E) A daily charge for driving downtown is the most effective way to reduce traffic congestion.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends for its conclusion to be properly drawn?
(A) The mayor’s plan to charge for driving downtown will be implemented before the end of next year.
(B) The city will incur a budget deficit if it does not receive the revenue it expects to raise from the charge for driving downtown.
(C) The plan to charge for driving downtown should be implemented as soon as payment of the charge can be effectively enforced.
(D) Raising revenue is a more important consideration for the city than is reducing traffic congestion.
(E) A daily charge for driving downtown is the most effective way to reduce traffic congestion.
Hi All,
While i agree that option C talks about the penalties which are abolished as per the new proposal, I want to explain why did it become a contender in the first place. Once we understand that, I will be able to explain why is it not a strengthener actually.
The conclusion said that the federal govt will collect a far lower PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL TAX owed by delinquents than did state governments. We need to strengthen the conclusion and I will provide an example of how option C SEEMS to do that.
EXAMPLE
A person A owed 100 $ as federal and 100 $ as state tax. Now lets assume federal penalty was 10 % of the tax owed and state penalty was 2 %
So total taxes with the penalty:
Federal : 110 $
State: 102 $
However since the proposed plan only collects 100 dollars in each case, state government earned 98 percent of the total tax it COULD have received ( 100/ 102) whereas federal government only receives 90 percent ( 100/110).
BUT the problem here is that we missed a key statement in the premise itself. The premise states that the new plan allows the delinquents to pay the TOTAL owed tax WITHOUT the penalties. Then later in the conclusion it actually refers to the total tax ( without the penalties) and not actually the total tax the govt COULD have earned.
I made the same mistake and I realised that we need to take official questions just by what is written and not what can be implied. If the question does not explicitly mention COULD, we shouldnt assume.
I hope that this explaination is able to calm the storms in some of your heads. Also I am very new to the verbal analysis culture and I will be more than happy to take feedbacks from the any1 who find the explanation above flawed!.
All the best
While i agree that option C talks about the penalties which are abolished as per the new proposal, I want to explain why did it become a contender in the first place. Once we understand that, I will be able to explain why is it not a strengthener actually.
The conclusion said that the federal govt will collect a far lower PERCENTAGE OF THE TOTAL TAX owed by delinquents than did state governments. We need to strengthen the conclusion and I will provide an example of how option C SEEMS to do that.
EXAMPLE
A person A owed 100 $ as federal and 100 $ as state tax. Now lets assume federal penalty was 10 % of the tax owed and state penalty was 2 %
So total taxes with the penalty:
Federal : 110 $
State: 102 $
However since the proposed plan only collects 100 dollars in each case, state government earned 98 percent of the total tax it COULD have received ( 100/ 102) whereas federal government only receives 90 percent ( 100/110).
BUT the problem here is that we missed a key statement in the premise itself. The premise states that the new plan allows the delinquents to pay the TOTAL owed tax WITHOUT the penalties. Then later in the conclusion it actually refers to the total tax ( without the penalties) and not actually the total tax the govt COULD have earned.
I made the same mistake and I realised that we need to take official questions just by what is written and not what can be implied. If the question does not explicitly mention COULD, we shouldnt assume.
I hope that this explaination is able to calm the storms in some of your heads. Also I am very new to the verbal analysis culture and I will be more than happy to take feedbacks from the any1 who find the explanation above flawed!.
All the best
04 Jul 2017, 07:11
Kudos
Bookmarks
In order to reduce traffic congestion and raise revenue for the city, the mayor plans to implement a charge of $10 per day for driving in the downtown area. Payment of this charge will be enforced using a highly sophisticated system that employs digital cameras and computerized automobile registration. This system will not be ready until the end of next year. Without this system, however, mass evasion of the charge will result. Therefore, when the mayor’s plan is first implemented, payment of the charge will not be effectively enforced.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends for its conclusion to be properly drawn?
(A) The mayor’s plan to charge for driving downtown will be implemented before the end of next year.
(B) The city will incur a budget deficit if it does not receive the revenue it expects to raise from the charge for driving downtown.
(C) The plan to charge for driving downtown should be implemented as soon as payment of the charge can be effectively enforced.
(D) Raising revenue is a more important consideration for the city than is reducing traffic congestion.
(E) A daily charge for driving downtown is the most effective way to reduce traffic congestion.
Which one of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends for its conclusion to be properly drawn?
(A) The mayor’s plan to charge for driving downtown will be implemented before the end of next year.
(B) The city will incur a budget deficit if it does not receive the revenue it expects to raise from the charge for driving downtown.
(C) The plan to charge for driving downtown should be implemented as soon as payment of the charge can be effectively enforced.
(D) Raising revenue is a more important consideration for the city than is reducing traffic congestion.
(E) A daily charge for driving downtown is the most effective way to reduce traffic congestion.
05 Jul 2017, 03:17
Kudos
Bookmarks
Akela
Premise:
The mayor plans to implement a charge for driving.
Mass evasion of the charge will result unless the highly sophisticated system is used.
This system will not be ready until the end of next year.
Conclusion:
If the mayor's plan is first implemented, the payment of the charge will not be effectively enforced.
The conclusion states that the payment of charge will not be effectively enforced because of mass evasion. However, the mass evasion is due to the lack of that highly sophisticated system. This means that the mayor's plan to charge for driving will be implemented before that system is ready, or before the end of next year. Choice A states this logic well.
