najsh2
C is too extreme. Why is E not the right answer?
Posted from my mobile deviceHi najsh2,
Let's look at the argument:
Muscular strength is a limited resource, and athletic techniques help to use this resource efficiently.
Since top athletes do not differ greatly from each other in muscular strength, it follows that a
requirement for an athlete to become a champion is a superior mastery of athletic techniques. Which one of the following most accurately expresses the conclusion of the argument?
The word "since" always signifies a conclusion.
Conclusion: Requirement to become a champion is a superior mastery of athletic technique (green highlighted). This is word for word what (C) states. Also, note the word 'requirement' (highlighted above). If something is a requirement, then nothing can occur without it, hence why no athlete can become a champion without it. And, hence the 'extreme' language.
C. No athlete can become a champion without a superior mastery of athletic techniques.
E. Athletic techniques help athletes use limited resources efficiently. --
This may be true, but it is not the conclusion.More words that signal a conclusion, if it helps:
Thus
Therefore
Hence
Consequently (“ly”)
As a result
So, If
Accordingly
Clearly
Must Be
Shows(is a action word) that
Conclude (is a action word) that
Follows that
For this reason
*I did not compile this list. It is derived from a CR word document found online that I can provide, if anyone wants it.