Last visit was: 26 Apr 2026, 16:04 It is currently 26 Apr 2026, 16:04
Home
Messages
Tests
Schools
Events
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Go to My Error Log Learn more
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
Back to Forum
Create Topic
655-705 (Hard)|   Inference|         
User avatar
broall
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Last visit: 07 Apr 2021
Posts: 1,133
Own Kudos:
7,377
 [21]
Given Kudos: 65
Status:Long way to go!
Location: Viet Nam
Posts: 1,133
Kudos: 7,377
 [21]
One method of dating the emergence of species is to compare 23 Sep 2017, 02:52
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
19
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
00:00
Start Timer
Pause Timer
Resume Timer
Show Answer
Hide
Show
History
D
Be sure to select an answer first to save it in the Error Log before revealing the correct answer (OA)!

Difficulty:

55% (hard)

Question Stats:

70% (02:41) correct 30% (02:42) wrong based on 1399 sessions

History

Date
Time
Result
Not Attempted Yet
One method of dating the emergence of species is to compare the genetic material of related species. Scientists theorize that the more genetically similar two species are to each other, the more recently they diverged from a common ancestor. After comparing genetic material from giant pandas, red pandas, raccoons, coatis, and all seven bear species, scientists concluded that bears and raccoons diverged 30 to 50 million years ago. They further concluded that red pandas separated from the ancestor of today’s raccoons and coatis a few million years later, some 10 million years before giant pandas diverged from the other bears.

Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the passage?

(A) Giant pandas and red pandas are more closely related than scientists originally thought they were.
(B) Scientists now count the giant panda as the eighth species of bear.
(C) It is possible to determine, within a margin of just a few years, the timing of divergence of various species.
(D) Scientists have found that giant pandas are more similar genetically to bears than to raccoons.
(E) There is substantial consensus among scientists that giant pandas and red pandas are equally related to raccoons.

Source: LSAT
ShowHide Answer
Official Answer
D
User avatar
mbsingh
User avatar
Joined: 03 Aug 2016
Last visit: 18 Jan 2019
Posts: 342
Own Kudos:
135
Given Kudos: 48
Location: Canada
Schools: Rotman '20 (A) Tuck '20 (D) Stanford '20 (S) Haas '20 (S) Darden '20 (S)
GMAT 1: 660 Q44 V38
GMAT 2: 690 Q46 V40
GPA: 3.9
WE:Information Technology (Consumer Packaged Goods)
Schools: Rotman '20 (A) Tuck '20 (D) Stanford '20 (S) Haas '20 (S) Darden '20 (S)
GMAT 2: 690 Q46 V40
Posts: 342
Kudos: 135
One method of dating the emergence of species is to compare 04 Oct 2017, 20:06
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
broall
One method of dating the emergence of species is to compare the genetic material of related species. Scientists theorize that the more genetically similar two species are to each other, the more recently they diverged from a common ancestor. After comparing genetic material from giant pandas, red pandas, raccoons, coatis, and all seven bear species, scientists concluded that bears and raccoons diverged 30 to 50 million years ago. They further concluded that red pandas separated from the ancestor of today’s raccoons and coatis a few million years later, some 10 million years before giant pandas diverged from the other bears.

Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the passage?

(A) Giant pandas and red pandas are more closely related than scientists originally thought they were.
(B) Scientists now count the giant panda as the eighth species of bear.
(C) It is possible to determine, within a margin of just a few years, the timing of divergence of various species.
(D) Scientists have found that giant pandas are more similar genetically to bears than to raccoons.
(E) There is substantial consensus among scientists that giant pandas and red pandas are equally related to raccoons.

Source: LSAT
Show more


I chose option E, even though there is no consensus but giant pandas and red pandas equally related to raccoons or more closely.
But if you look at option D (OA) , it states that scientists found giant pandas are similar to bears than to raccoons even though passage begs to differ
They further concluded that red pandas separated from the ancestor of today’s raccoons and coatis a few million years later,

Any thoughts broall
User avatar
broall
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 10 Oct 2016
Last visit: 07 Apr 2021
Posts: 1,133
Own Kudos:
7,377
 [4]
Given Kudos: 65
Status:Long way to go!
Location: Viet Nam
Posts: 1,133
Kudos: 7,377
 [4]
One method of dating the emergence of species is to compare 04 Oct 2017, 20:59
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
mbsingh
broall
One method of dating the emergence of species is to compare the genetic material of related species. Scientists theorize that the more genetically similar two species are to each other, the more recently they diverged from a common ancestor. After comparing genetic material from giant pandas, red pandas, raccoons, coatis, and all seven bear species, scientists concluded that bears and raccoons diverged 30 to 50 million years ago. They further concluded that red pandas separated from the ancestor of today’s raccoons and coatis a few million years later, some 10 million years before giant pandas diverged from the other bears.

Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the passage?

(A) Giant pandas and red pandas are more closely related than scientists originally thought they were.
(B) Scientists now count the giant panda as the eighth species of bear.
(C) It is possible to determine, within a margin of just a few years, the timing of divergence of various species.
(D) Scientists have found that giant pandas are more similar genetically to bears than to raccoons.
(E) There is substantial consensus among scientists that giant pandas and red pandas are equally related to raccoons.

Source: LSAT


I chose option E, even though there is no consensus but giant pandas and red pandas equally related to raccoons or more closely.
But if you look at option D (OA) , it states that scientists found giant pandas are similar to bears than to raccoons even though passage begs to differ
They further concluded that red pandas separated from the ancestor of today’s raccoons and coatis a few million years later,

Any thoughts broall
Show more


First, look at scientists' theory: the more genetically similar two species are to each other, the more recently they diverged from a common ancestor

Now, the passage gives some facts:
bears vs raccoons: 30-50 million years ago
red pandas vs the ancestor of today’s raccoons and coatis: at leats 20 million years ago
giant pandas vs the other bears: at max 10 million year ago

Hence, it's clear that the event that giant pandas diverged from the other bears is the most recent. Thus D.

In E, the problem is "are equally related to". The theory tries to compare genetic between 2 species, not among 3 species.
User avatar
Skywalker18
User avatar
Retired Moderator
Joined: 08 Dec 2013
Last visit: 15 Nov 2023
Posts: 1,973
Own Kudos:
10,181
 [1]
Given Kudos: 171
Status:Greatness begins beyond your comfort zone
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Strategy
GPA: 3.2
WE:Information Technology (Consulting)
Products:
My Reviews
Posts: 1,973
Kudos: 10,181
 [1]
One method of dating the emergence of species is to compare 13 Dec 2017, 05:05
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
broall
One method of dating the emergence of species is to compare the genetic material of related species. Scientists theorize that the more genetically similar two species are to each other, the more recently they diverged from a common ancestor. After comparing genetic material from giant pandas, red pandas, raccoons, coatis, and all seven bear species, scientists concluded that bears and raccoons diverged 30 to 50 million years ago. They further concluded that red pandas separated from the ancestor of today’s raccoons and coatis a few million years later, some 10 million years before giant pandas diverged from the other bears.

Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the passage?

(A) Giant pandas and red pandas are more closely related than scientists originally thought they were.
(B) Scientists now count the giant panda as the eighth species of bear.
(C) It is possible to determine, within a margin of just a few years, the timing of divergence of various species.
(D) Scientists have found that giant pandas are more similar genetically to bears than to raccoons.
(E) There is substantial consensus among scientists that giant pandas and red pandas are equally related to raccoons.

Source: LSAT
Show more

When bears separated from raccoons, there were no pandas, because they had not yet diverged and become their own species.

See what I mean?

In the beginning, there were some things. 30-50 million years ago, they split into "bears" and "raccoons." Some time after that, red pandas separated from raccoons and coatis. Some time after that, "bears" split into "giant panda" and "other bears."

Don't make this harder than it needs to be! No other answer comes anywhere close, so simply playing the game of elimination should be enough to get you the answer. What do you know? Something about the relative closeness of bears, pandas, red pandas, and raccoons.

(A) "originally thought?" No evidence for this.
(B) "eight species?" Nope.
(C) "margin of just a few years?" Nope.
(E) "substantial consensus?" Not even close.

Just by ballparking, we can see that (D) is the only reasonable answer.
avatar
MeBossBaby
avatar
Joined: 05 Mar 2018
Last visit: 23 Sep 2020
Posts: 31
Own Kudos:
33
 [1]
Given Kudos: 97
Posts: 31
Kudos: 33
 [1]
One method of dating the emergence of species is to compare 23 Mar 2019, 00:53
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Skywalker18
broall
One method of dating the emergence of species is to compare the genetic material of related species. Scientists theorize that the more genetically similar two species are to each other, the more recently they diverged from a common ancestor. After comparing genetic material from giant pandas, red pandas, raccoons, coatis, and all seven bear species, scientists concluded that bears and raccoons diverged 30 to 50 million years ago. They further concluded that red pandas separated from the ancestor of today’s raccoons and coatis a few million years later, some 10 million years before giant pandas diverged from the other bears.

Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the passage?

(A) Giant pandas and red pandas are more closely related than scientists originally thought they were.
(B) Scientists now count the giant panda as the eighth species of bear.
(C) It is possible to determine, within a margin of just a few years, the timing of divergence of various species.
(D) Scientists have found that giant pandas are more similar genetically to bears than to raccoons.
(E) There is substantial consensus among scientists that giant pandas and red pandas are equally related to raccoons.

Source: LSAT

When bears separated from raccoons, there were no pandas, because they had not yet diverged and become their own species.

See what I mean?

In the beginning, there were some things. 30-50 million years ago, they split into "bears" and "raccoons." Some time after that, red pandas separated from raccoons and coatis. Some time after that, "bears" split into "giant panda" and "other bears."

Don't make this harder than it needs to be! No other answer comes anywhere close, so simply playing the game of elimination should be enough to get you the answer. What do you know? Something about the relative closeness of bears, pandas, red pandas, and raccoons.

(A) "originally thought?" No evidence for this.
(B) "eight species?" Nope.
(C) "margin of just a few years?" Nope.
(E) "substantial consensus?" Not even close.

Just by ballparking, we can see that (D) is the only reasonable answer.
Show more


I am not satisfied with option D, as option D compares giant pandas and raccoons, which is no where in the passage. The passage only states genetic diversion of giant pandas and bears.
Could you help with this?
avatar
speedrevision37
avatar
Joined: 30 Jan 2021
Last visit: 19 Oct 2021
Posts: 14
Own Kudos:
26
Given Kudos: 7
Posts: 14
Kudos: 26
One method of dating the emergence of species is to compare 30 May 2021, 11:32
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Since it is given in the question stem that giant panda diverged from bears and it is the most recent case, option D fits in as correct answer choice.
User avatar
unraveled
User avatar
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,706
Own Kudos:
2,329
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,706
Kudos: 2,329
One method of dating the emergence of species is to compare 24 Mar 2023, 08:14
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
One method of dating the emergence of species is to compare the genetic material of related species. Scientists theorize that the more genetically similar two species are to each other, the more recently they diverged from a common ancestor. After comparing genetic material from giant pandas, red pandas, raccoons, coatis, and all seven bear species, scientists concluded that bears and raccoons diverged 30 to 50 million years ago. They further concluded that red pandas separated from the ancestor of today’s raccoons and coatis a few million years later, some 10 million years before giant pandas diverged from the other bears.

Which one of the following can be properly inferred from the passage?

(A) Giant pandas and red pandas are more closely related than scientists originally thought they were. - WRONG.
(B) Scientists now count the giant panda as the eighth species of bear. - WRONG.
(C) It is possible to determine, within a margin of just a few years, the timing of divergence of various species. - WRONG.
(D) Scientists have found that giant pandas are more similar genetically to bears than to raccoons. - CORRECT.
(E) There is substantial consensus among scientists that giant pandas and red pandas are equally related to raccoons. - WRONG.
This is a question that would be pain in the *** for any test taker, for simply for the reason that s/he might waste more time identifying the relation(blue text) - leading to longer time to eliminate choices - when one can simply eliminate the choices based on the language(red text) it uses. However, it can only happen unless one doesn't get overwhelmed by the relationship aspect between the parameter/aspects discussed in the passage.

Answer D.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,425
Own Kudos:
1,010
Posts: 19,425
Kudos: 1,010
One method of dating the emergence of species is to compare 06 Aug 2025, 08:21
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMATNinja
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
AbhishekP220108
506 posts
bhanu29
361 posts