Last visit was: 23 Apr 2026, 20:05 It is currently 23 Apr 2026, 20:05
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
pushpitkc
Joined: 26 Feb 2016
Last visit: 19 Feb 2025
Posts: 2,800
Own Kudos:
6,235
 [15]
Given Kudos: 47
Location: India
GPA: 3.12
Posts: 2,800
Kudos: 6,235
 [15]
4
Kudos
Add Kudos
11
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
u1983
User avatar
Current Student
Joined: 24 Aug 2016
Last visit: 06 Jun 2021
Posts: 700
Own Kudos:
873
 [2]
Given Kudos: 97
GMAT 1: 540 Q49 V16
GMAT 2: 680 Q49 V33
Products:
GMAT 2: 680 Q49 V33
Posts: 700
Kudos: 873
 [2]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
chetan2u
User avatar
GMAT Expert
Joined: 02 Aug 2009
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 11,229
Own Kudos:
45,003
 [2]
Given Kudos: 335
Status:Math and DI Expert
Location: India
Concentration: Human Resources, General Management
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 735 Q90 V89 DI81
Posts: 11,229
Kudos: 45,003
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
SonalSinha803
Joined: 14 Feb 2018
Last visit: 18 Feb 2019
Posts: 303
Own Kudos:
324
 [1]
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 303
Kudos: 324
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
A, C and D can easily be eliminated.

E says jobs have increasedby 50%, while the number of houses have gone up by 40%....( It doesn't mean that increase in jobs has been done by government, they could be private jobs. Moreover, increase in jobs still does not resolve, because argument talks about salary). Thus, I eliminated E.

I chose B because it gives an alternative reason as to why the price of owning a house has increased and clearly reflects that government has no role to play over here.

Thus, I find B more appropriate.

OA ??

Sent from my Lenovo K53a48 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
User avatar
getahead
Joined: 16 Mar 2018
Last visit: 08 May 2019
Posts: 36
Own Kudos:
22
 [1]
Given Kudos: 43
Location: United Kingdom
GMAT 1: 650 Q45 V35
GMAT 1: 650 Q45 V35
Posts: 36
Kudos: 22
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
SonalSinha803
A, C and D can easily be eliminated.

E says jobs have increasedby 50%, while the number of houses have gone up by 40%....( It doesn't mean that increase in jobs has been done by government, they could be private jobs. Moreover, increase in jobs still does not resolve, because argument talks about salary). Thus, I eliminated E.

I chose B because it gives an alternative reason as to why the price of owning a house has increased and clearly reflects that government has no role to play over here.

Thus, I find B more appropriate.

OA ??

Sent from my Lenovo K53a48 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app

Hi,
Can you please help me understand this is how I looked at it and came up with E as the answer.


Conclusion is that Govt has not done enough.... to control the housing price rise.


Question asks us to Weaken it that would mean finding an answer that says Govt has done enough. How come B supports that?
If only it strengthens it saying Govt did not intervene to control the trend that caused increasing house prices.

Please help understanding.
Thanks




Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
avatar
Rollroll
Joined: 07 Jun 2017
Last visit: 24 Apr 2019
Posts: 28
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 597
Location: United Arab Emirates
Concentration: Healthcare, International Business
GMAT 1: 580 Q42 V28
GPA: 3.19
Products:
GMAT 1: 580 Q42 V28
Posts: 28
Kudos: 9
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
B rightly gives an explanation that why people are not buying house because renting that particular house is more beneficial than buying one.
User avatar
SonalSinha803
Joined: 14 Feb 2018
Last visit: 18 Feb 2019
Posts: 303
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 29
Posts: 303
Kudos: 324
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
getahead
SonalSinha803
A, C and D can easily be eliminated.

E says jobs have increasedby 50%, while the number of houses have gone up by 40%....( It doesn't mean that increase in jobs has been done by government, they could be private jobs. Moreover, increase in jobs still does not resolve, because argument talks about salary). Thus, I eliminated E.

I chose B because it gives an alternative reason as to why the price of owning a house has increased and clearly reflects that government has no role to play over here.

Thus, I find B more appropriate.

OA ??

Sent from my Lenovo K53a48 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app

Hi,
Can you please help me understand this is how I looked at it and came up with E as the answer.


Conclusion is that Govt has not done enough.... to control the housing price rise.


Question asks us to Weaken it that would mean finding an answer that says Govt has done enough. How come B supports that?
If only it strengthens it saying Govt did not intervene to control the trend that caused increasing house prices.

Please help understanding.
Thanks




Sent from my iPhone using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
Hi !!

Option B is more appropriate because it gives you an alternative reason as to why the price of owning a house has increased.

On the other hand E says an increase in the job. So think....

1. Is the increase in job means that salary has also increased upto a level where house can be bought ??

2. Does it even specify that job increase is due to the role of government ??

Answer to both questions is a NO.

Thus, E is tempting but a trap.

On GMAT weaken question can be resolved when argument states X -->Y and you chose an option which says either -

(1) Y -->X

(2) X--/> Y ( X did not cause Y)

(3) Z --> Y ( an alternative reason as to why Y happened is Z and not X)

This question has option B correct and B is of the 3rd type.

Hope it helps



Sent from my Lenovo K53a48 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
User avatar
Jks3000
Joined: 28 Mar 2018
Last visit: 12 Nov 2025
Posts: 168
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 63
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Technology
GMAT 1: 700 Q49 V36
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V39
Products:
GMAT 2: 730 Q50 V39
Posts: 168
Kudos: 77
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
HORRIBLE QUESTION & WRONG OA :x :x :x :x :x

We have to weaken the CONCLUSION

And the conclusion starts with word "Clearly," ie. "Clearly, the government has not done enough "

Option B is giving alternate reason why the cost of house increased. BUT we already know that this increased. It does NOT matter if it increased due to X or due to Y. Does it says that price increased because of Govt. ???? NO.
User avatar
HarshZsssh
Joined: 20 Aug 2024
Last visit: 12 Apr 2025
Posts: 41
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 24
Posts: 41
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
but in option b rental accomadation is new information which is directly not mentioned in the passae than how can i got the correct i would really appreciate ur insight on this
SonalSinha803
A, C and D can easily be eliminated.

E says jobs have increasedby 50%, while the number of houses have gone up by 40%....( It doesn't mean that increase in jobs has been done by government, they could be private jobs. Moreover, increase in jobs still does not resolve, because argument talks about salary). Thus, I eliminated E.

I chose B because it gives an alternative reason as to why the price of owning a house has increased and clearly reflects that government has no role to play over here.

Thus, I find B more appropriate.

OA ??

Sent from my Lenovo K53a48 using GMAT Club Forum mobile app
User avatar
Vanshjika
Joined: 12 Jun 2023
Last visit: 01 Sep 2025
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 1
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Requesting you to please explain this. Thank you
User avatar
sghosh1096
Joined: 21 May 2025
Last visit: 05 Feb 2026
Posts: 23
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 687
Location: India
Concentration: Operations, Statistics
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q88 V82 DI81
GPA: 7.4
WE:Operations (Telecommunications)
GMAT Focus 1: 675 Q88 V82 DI81
Posts: 23
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
I eliminated E since it has mentioned about the number of Jobs and the number of houses going up.
While the arguement we have to weaken talks about the salary not increasing as per increasing costs of houses
u1983
pushpitkc
People of this country have been finding it difficult to buy their own houses. In the last two decades, the percentage of working population possessing their own homes has gone down. The primary reason is that while the average salary of the working population has increased fivefold in the last two decades, the average cost of a house has shot up ten times. Clearly, the government has not done enough to ensure that the citizens' salaries increase as per the increasing costs of houses.

Which of the following, if true, would most weaken the argument above?

A. In the two decades before the last two, the disparity between salary and housing prices was rising too.
B. The trend of rental accommodation has increased drastically in the last two decades, adding to the financial benefits of owning a house and thereby, increasing the cost of owning a house.
C. Most immigrants who entered the country in the last two decades have purchased their own houses.
D. The percentage of working people owning their own houses has declined more rapidly in the last decade than in the decade preceding this last.
E. The number of jobs in the country has gone up by fifty percent while the number of houses has gone up by forty percent in the last two decades.

Source: Experts Global


Option A,C & D are out of scope

Option B: Rental Accommodation trend upwards ----> increases financial benifit of owning house ---->increase cost of owning house .... but this donot talk about Govt measures

Option E: job increased 50% ( a clear outcome of +ve govt measures) AND housing increase 40%(could be a +ve govt measures) -- thus govt has done something but still the housing price is going up ( may be due to other factors of economics e.g., supply -demand). Hence the claim about the Govt's action in the argument weakens .
Ans Option E
User avatar
Dream009
Joined: 05 Nov 2024
Last visit: 13 Mar 2026
Posts: 276
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 60
Location: India
Concentration: Strategy, Leadership
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q82 V79 DI80
GRE 1: Q30 V50
GPA: 84
WE:General Management (Consulting)
Products:
GMAT Focus 1: 615 Q82 V79 DI80
GRE 1: Q30 V50
Posts: 276
Kudos: 98
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
COnclusion is that government has not done enough to keep salary at par with rising cost of houses. Not everyone owns a house - so how will they benefit from it?
Option C makes more sense - that government has created opportunities - or done something for people who do not have houses to afford - houses. Maybe not with income but this directly negates it better than whatever B says. It only speaks about why housing prices increased - nothing about all citizen's salary who may or may not own a house. KarishmaB - please help if this is a poor quality question or my CR skills are weak
User avatar
agrasan
Joined: 18 Jan 2024
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 676
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 6,475
Location: India
Posts: 676
Kudos: 174
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Hi MartyMurray KarishmaB

B. The trend of rental accommodation has increased drastically in the last two decades, adding to the financial benefits of owning a house and thereby, increasing the cost of owning a house.
Could you explain how (B) is correct? My rejection reason was that (B) just explains the fact why cost of owning a house increased.

E. The number of jobs in the country has gone up by fifty percent while the number of houses has gone up by forty percent in the last two decades.
Can you pls explain how this is wrong? I thought that all other options are wrong and (E) provides an alternative reason or how government cannot be blamed for the phenomenon observed in the argument.
User avatar
pappal
Joined: 24 Nov 2022
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 319
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 96
Products:
Posts: 319
Kudos: 109
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
statistical information given-->points to inefficiency of govt over the point of discussion.
what if the statistical information which is the basis of the conclusion is a result of other reason, that is mentioned in B.
however E talks about the efforts of govt to provide more no of jobs in relation to the no of houses increased , but not on the increase in the salaries/purchasing power of people correspondingly to the increase in the prices of houses .
so B fits better .
User avatar
MartyMurray
Joined: 11 Aug 2023
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 1,845
Own Kudos:
7,103
 [2]
Given Kudos: 212
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
GMAT 1: 800 Q51 V51
Posts: 1,845
Kudos: 7,103
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
agrasan
B. The trend of rental accommodation has increased drastically in the last two decades, adding to the financial benefits of owning a house and thereby, increasing the cost of owning a house.
Could you explain how (B) is correct? My rejection reason was that (B) just explains the fact why cost of owning a house increased.

E. The number of jobs in the country has gone up by fifty percent while the number of houses has gone up by forty percent in the last two decades.
Can you pls explain how this is wrong? I thought that all other options are wrong and (E) provides an alternative reason or how government cannot be blamed for the phenomenon observed in the argument.
It's a busted question.

The conclusion of the argument is that the government has not done enough to ensure that salaries increase as per the increasing costs of houses, but the credited answer presents a reason why housing costs have increased, not a reason to believe that the government may have done enough to ensure that the citizens' salaries increase as per the increasing costs of houses.

Also, (E) doesn't work either, because the point of the argument involves increasing salaries, not "the number of jobs."

So, there's no correct answer among the answer choices.
User avatar
KarishmaB
Joined: 16 Oct 2010
Last visit: 23 Apr 2026
Posts: 16,441
Own Kudos:
79,397
 [2]
Given Kudos: 484
Location: Pune, India
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 16,441
Kudos: 79,397
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Dream009
COnclusion is that government has not done enough to keep salary at par with rising cost of houses. Not everyone owns a house - so how will they benefit from it?
Option C makes more sense - that government has created opportunities - or done something for people who do not have houses to afford - houses. Maybe not with income but this directly negates it better than whatever B says. It only speaks about why housing prices increased - nothing about all citizen's salary who may or may not own a house. KarishmaB - please help if this is a poor quality question or my CR skills are weak
The question makes no sense. No option addresses what the Govt may or may not have done. Ignore.

This Question is Locked Due to Poor Quality
Hi there,
The question you've reached has been archived due to not meeting our community quality standards. No more replies are possible here.
Looking for better-quality questions? Check out the 'Similar Questions' block below for a list of similar but high-quality questions.
Want to join other relevant Problem Solving discussions? Visit our Critical Reasoning (CR) Forum for the most recent and top-quality discussions.
Thank you for understanding, and happy exploring!
User avatar
SreenivasGiri
Joined: 22 Apr 2025
Last visit: 22 Apr 2026
Posts: 3
Given Kudos: 9
Posts: 3
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The key is to catch on the word 'drastically' in option 'B'. it clearly shows that government must have done its part in ensuring salary increase but due to high attractiveness, owning a house beyond purpose of necessity the prices saw a more than normal spike.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
501 posts
358 posts