Last visit was: 24 Apr 2026, 16:13 It is currently 24 Apr 2026, 16:13
Close
GMAT Club Daily Prep
Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History
Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.
Close
Request Expert Reply
Confirm Cancel
User avatar
Bunuel
User avatar
Math Expert
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Last visit: 24 Apr 2026
Posts: 109,818
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 105,873
Products:
Expert
Expert reply
Active GMAT Club Expert! Tag them with @ followed by their username for a faster response.
Posts: 109,818
Kudos: 811,077
 [16]
3
Kudos
Add Kudos
13
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
gmat1393
User avatar
Share GMAT Experience Moderator
Joined: 25 Apr 2018
Last visit: 19 Dec 2022
Posts: 626
Own Kudos:
2,630
 [2]
Given Kudos: 199
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Products:
GMAT 1: 680 Q49 V34
Posts: 626
Kudos: 2,630
 [2]
2
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
avatar
Rameshllll
Joined: 23 Dec 2019
Last visit: 17 Jan 2022
Posts: 2
Given Kudos: 5
Posts: 2
Kudos: 0
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
User avatar
analytica233
Joined: 04 Aug 2019
Last visit: 15 Nov 2022
Posts: 62
Own Kudos:
90
 [1]
Given Kudos: 745
Location: Viet Nam
Concentration: Organizational Behavior, Strategy
Schools: Desautels '23
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
WE:Research (Other)
Products:
Schools: Desautels '23
GMAT 1: 740 Q49 V42
Posts: 62
Kudos: 90
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Rameshllll
D and E both are close ....can't see how to reject E.

Posted from my mobile device

(E) is incorrect because the geologists acknowledge the physical evidence that the channels were formed quickly. What they rejected initially was the flood THEORY to explain the physical evidence.
avatar
anshulvnd5
Joined: 06 May 2019
Last visit: 08 Mar 2024
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
5
 [1]
Given Kudos: 88
Posts: 20
Kudos: 5
 [1]
Kudos
Add Kudos
1
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Can anyone explain why Option A is incorrect
User avatar
rohit8865
Joined: 05 Mar 2015
Last visit: 19 Apr 2026
Posts: 815
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 45
Products:
Posts: 815
Kudos: 1,008
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
anshulvnd5
Can anyone explain why Option A is incorrect


it is quoting a generic view ...
avatar
anshulvnd5
Joined: 06 May 2019
Last visit: 08 Mar 2024
Posts: 20
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 88
Posts: 20
Kudos: 5
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
rohit8865
anshulvnd5
Can anyone explain why Option A is incorrect


it is quoting a generic view ...

I am still not getting it, I mean this generic view is right ?

Posted from my mobile device
User avatar
unraveled
Joined: 07 Mar 2019
Last visit: 10 Apr 2025
Posts: 2,706
Own Kudos:
2,329
 [1]
Given Kudos: 763
Location: India
WE:Sales (Energy)
Posts: 2,706
Kudos: 2,329
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
The Gulches is an area of volcanic rock that is gashed by many channels that lead downhill from the site of a prehistoric glacier to a river. The channels clearly were cut by running water. It was once accepted as fact that the cutting occurred gradually, as the glacier melted. But one geologist theorized that the channels were cut in a short time by an enormous flood. The channels do show physical evidence of having been formed quickly, but the flood theory was originally rejected because scientists knew of no natural process that could melt so much ice so quickly. Paradoxically, today the scientific community accepts the flood theory even though scientists still do not know of a process that can melt so much ice so quickly.

Which one of the following is supported by the information in the passage?

(A) Only running water can cause deep channels in volcanic rock. - WRONG. Bit extreme claim to make. 

(B) The river did not exist before the channels were cut. - WRONG. Again like A a bit extreme claim.

(C) Geologists cannot determine the amount of heat required to melt a glacier quickly. - WRONG. They may know or they may not. 

(D) The physical effects of water on rock vary with the speed with which those effects are produced. - CORRECT. Aligns with the blue text.

(E) Geologists are compelled to reject physical evidence when it leads to an unexplainable conclusion. - WRONG. They din't accept earlier but now they accept that theory.

Answer D.
User avatar
arthurchichester
Joined: 27 Feb 2024
Last visit: 29 Jan 2026
Posts: 10
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 9
Posts: 10
Kudos: 1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
Rameshllll
D and E both are close ....can't see how to reject E.

Posted from my mobile device
D and E are not close at all,
Considering E, there is no compulsion stated in the para to straight up reject physical evidence when it leads to an unexplainable conclusion, its too extreme of a choice.
D on the other hand, sums up the underlying fact on which the para is based.
User avatar
DmitryFarberMPrep
User avatar
Manhattan Prep Instructor
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Last visit: 03 Mar 2026
Posts: 3,005
Own Kudos:
8,625
 [1]
Given Kudos: 57
Expert
Expert reply
GMAT Focus 1: 745 Q86 V90 DI85
Posts: 3,005
Kudos: 8,625
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
 
anshulvnd5

rohit8865

anshulvnd5
Can anyone explain why Option A is incorrect

it is quoting a generic view ...
I am still not getting it, I mean this generic view is right ?

Posted from my mobile device
­We need an answer that is fully supported by the given info. All the text tells us is that these particular trenches were clearly cut by running water. That doesn't mean that water is the only thing that can EVER cause deep channels. Even if we knew this to be true in real life, that wouldn't make it supported by the text. (A could say that 10 > 2, and it still wouldn't be supported by the text.)
User avatar
8Harshitsharma
Joined: 25 Oct 2017
Last visit: 06 Jul 2025
Posts: 127
Own Kudos:
160
 [1]
Given Kudos: 723
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q87 V80 DI80
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GRE 1: Q165 V160
GRE 2: Q170 V162
GPA: 9.25
GMAT Focus 1: 655 Q87 V80 DI80
GMAT 1: 690 Q49 V35
GRE 1: Q165 V160
GRE 2: Q170 V162
Posts: 127
Kudos: 160
 [1]
1
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Rameshllll
D and E both are close ....can't see how to reject E.

Posted from my mobile device
­E is the opposite of what is stated in the passage. One geologist proposed that channels were cut by a flood, not reject it. The SCIENTIFIC community rejected the theory because they didn't have an explanation for that.

We don't know for sure that Geologists rejected anything with the info presented in the passage. Maybe geologists believed in it but other scientists disagreed with the flood theory so they also had to keep shush and agree with the larger community.­
User avatar
akshaypratap278
Joined: 16 May 2023
Last visit: 29 Nov 2025
Posts: 17
Own Kudos:
Given Kudos: 116
Location: India
GMAT Focus 1: 665 Q83 V84 DI82
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V30
GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V37
GPA: 4
WE:Supply Chain Management (Consulting)
GMAT Focus 1: 665 Q83 V84 DI82
GMAT 2: 700 Q48 V37
Posts: 17
Kudos: 10
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
(A) Only running water can cause deep channels in volcanic rock.
- 'Only' is very strong. Can't be sure on this.

(B) The river did not exist before the channels were cut.
- Again very strong. Who know, they exist before too?

(C) Geologists cannot determine the amount of heat required to melt a glacier quickly.
- Nothing about the 'heat'. So can't be sure here too.

(D) The physical effects of water on rock vary with the speed with which those effects are produced.
- True. See in passage when we talk about glacier melting (here the speed of water will be slow), we say 'gradually'. But with enormous floods (when speed will be high), it is cut quickly. CORRECT.

(E) Geologists are compelled to reject physical evidence when it leads to an unexplainable conclusion.
- They didn't reject. They were the one who proposed and there were physical evidence to it too.
User avatar
VerbalBot
User avatar
Non-Human User
Joined: 01 Oct 2013
Last visit: 04 Jan 2021
Posts: 19,424
Own Kudos:
Posts: 19,424
Kudos: 1,010
Kudos
Add Kudos
Bookmarks
Bookmark this Post
Automated notice from GMAT Club VerbalBot:

A member just gave Kudos to this thread, showing it’s still useful. I’ve bumped it to the top so more people can benefit. Feel free to add your own questions or solutions.

This post was generated automatically.
Moderators:
GMAT Club Verbal Expert
7391 posts
504 posts
358 posts