[quote="Bunuel"]Rachel: The legal drinking age in America should remain at 21, because teens have not yet reached an age where they are able to consume alcohol responsibly. Additionally, the actions of 18-year-olds are more likely to be imitated by teens aged 15 to 17 than are the actions of those who are significantly older, so lowering the drinking age to 18 would also result in increased alcohol consumption by younger teens trying to emulate the actions of their older peers.
Mackenzie: The drinking age in America should be lowered to 18, because keeping it at 21 has not only failed to curb teen drinking but has encouraged those teens who do drink to do so in private, uncontrolled environments where they are more prone to life-endangering behavior. Many youths in European countries drink from an early age, and those countries have substantially fewer alcohol-related problems than we do in America.
Which of the following, if true, would most significantly weaken Mackenzie’s argument?
(A) The idea that Europeans and other nations with low or no minimum drinking ages do not have alcohol-related problems is a myth.
(B) If Americans are allowed to give their lives for this country at age 18, then they should be considered old enough to make the proper decision as to what to put in their bodies.
(C) More American high-school students drink now than they did decades ago, when the drinking age was lower.
(D) In European culture, youths are taught at an early age that it is acceptable to either abstain from alcohol entirely or drink in moderation and that it is never acceptable for them to abuse alcohol, regardless of their age.
(E) European youths are just as likely as American youths to drink in private, uncontrolled environments.
IMO the correct answer is option E.
If the European youths are as likely as American youths to drink in private, uncontrolled environment; then they are exposed to similar risks thereby refuting Mackenzie's claim.