GMAT Question of the Day - Daily to your Mailbox; hard ones only

It is currently 22 Oct 2019, 17:01

Close

GMAT Club Daily Prep

Thank you for using the timer - this advanced tool can estimate your performance and suggest more practice questions. We have subscribed you to Daily Prep Questions via email.

Customized
for You

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Track
Your Progress

every week, we’ll send you an estimated GMAT score based on your performance

Practice
Pays

we will pick new questions that match your level based on your Timer History

Not interested in getting valuable practice questions and articles delivered to your email? No problem, unsubscribe here.

Close

Request Expert Reply

Confirm Cancel

Rachel: The legal drinking age in America should remain at 21, because

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  
Author Message
TAGS:

Hide Tags

Find Similar Topics 
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58427
Rachel: The legal drinking age in America should remain at 21, because  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Feb 2019, 01:23
00:00
A
B
C
D
E

Difficulty:

  75% (hard)

Question Stats:

56% (02:12) correct 44% (02:23) wrong based on 280 sessions

HideShow timer Statistics

Rachel: The legal drinking age in America should remain at 21, because teens have not yet reached an age where they are able to consume alcohol responsibly. Additionally, the actions of 18-year-olds are more likely to be imitated by teens aged 15 to 17 than are the actions of those who are significantly older, so lowering the drinking age to 18 would also result in increased alcohol consumption by younger teens trying to emulate the actions of their older peers.

Mackenzie: The drinking age in America should be lowered to 18, because keeping it at 21 has not only failed to curb teen drinking but has encouraged those teens who do drink to do so in private, uncontrolled environments where they are more prone to life-endangering behavior. Many youths in European countries drink from an early age, and those countries have substantially fewer alcohol-related problems than we do in America.

Rachel’s argument is based on which of the following assumptions?


(A) Those who have reached the age of 21 are able to consume alcohol more responsibly than those who are 18.

(B) When European teenagers consume alcohol, they do so in public, controlled environments.

(C) Teens who are 15 to 17 years old are more impressionable than those who are aged 18 or older.

(D) The impressionability of one’s actions on others should not be a consideration when deciding the legal age to consume alcohol.

(E) Consuming alcohol in private, uncontrolled environments is not more dangerous than consuming alcohol in more public environments, such as bars or restaurants.


SIMILAR "WEAKEN "QUESTION IS HERE.

_________________
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 31 Dec 2018
Posts: 114
Location: India
GMAT ToolKit User Premium Member
Re: Rachel: The legal drinking age in America should remain at 21, because  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Feb 2019, 01:43
1
option A

Rachel's entire argument is based on responsible consumption of alcohol with no consideration of European Peers.

Posted from my mobile device
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 20 May 2017
Posts: 25
Location: Slovakia (Slovak Republic)
GMAT 1: 640 Q49 V28
GRE 1: Q166 V152
GPA: 3.7
Re: Rachel: The legal drinking age in America should remain at 21, because  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Feb 2019, 03:05
1
mohitranjan05 wrote:
option A

Rachel's entire argument is based on responsible consumption of alcohol with no consideration of European Peers.

Posted from my mobile device


Answer should be C because main issue highlighted by the Rachel is that young people (age 15) imitate older one and Rachel directly assumes that older kids (age 18) do not do so or at least are less likely do do so.
Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 12 Jul 2017
Posts: 212
GMAT 1: 570 Q43 V26
GMAT 2: 660 Q48 V34
Re: Rachel: The legal drinking age in America should remain at 21, because  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Feb 2019, 04:45
Answer should be a.

Ans c says that the 15 year olds are more impressionable than 18.

But Rachel's argument is that if we lower the age limit to 18 then it's a problem as the responsibility is decreased.

So the age concern of above 18's impressionism does not really matter.

Regards,
Rishav

Posted from my mobile device
BSchool Moderator
avatar
G
Joined: 11 Feb 2018
Posts: 296
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 3: 750 Q50 V42
Re: Rachel: The legal drinking age in America should remain at 21, because  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Feb 2019, 06:27
I vote for C.

The answer is not A because drinking responsibly is already mentioned in the passage.

Posted from my mobile device
Manager
Manager
avatar
G
Joined: 12 Jul 2017
Posts: 212
GMAT 1: 570 Q43 V26
GMAT 2: 660 Q48 V34
Re: Rachel: The legal drinking age in America should remain at 21, because  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Feb 2019, 06:34
redskull1 wrote:
I vote for C.

The answer is not A because drinking responsibly is already mentioned in the passage.

Posted from my mobile device



Exactly the responsibility factor is mentioned but if you notice carefully it is for 18 years :)

We are inherently assuming that 21 years is a responsible age.

And same is assumed by Rachel as well.

Apart from that the whole argument by both the debators hinges on the responsibility only as per me.
Manager
Manager
avatar
S
Joined: 13 Oct 2018
Posts: 85
Location: India
GPA: 3.1
WE: Information Technology (Computer Software)
Re: Rachel: The legal drinking age in America should remain at 21, because  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Feb 2019, 07:12
I'll go for A .

Rachal argument is based on the age when one drink responsibly .
Other statement is additional premise to support why the age should not be decreased.
_________________
Ankit
GMAT is tough so I am ...
Giving Kudos is the best way to encourage and appreciate people
BSchool Moderator
avatar
G
Joined: 11 Feb 2018
Posts: 296
Location: India
Concentration: General Management, Finance
GMAT 1: 690 Q47 V37
GMAT 2: 710 Q50 V36
GMAT 3: 750 Q50 V42
Re: Rachel: The legal drinking age in America should remain at 21, because  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 14 Feb 2019, 08:13
I dont know.I am still veering towards C because negating C breaks the argument.Also,in my view,the first statement of rachels argument and option A are pretty similar

Posted from my mobile device
Math Expert
User avatar
V
Joined: 02 Sep 2009
Posts: 58427
Re: Rachel: The legal drinking age in America should remain at 21, because  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 26 Feb 2019, 02:23
2
1
Bunuel wrote:
Rachel: The legal drinking age in America should remain at 21, because teens have not yet reached an age where they are able to consume alcohol responsibly. Additionally, the actions of 18-year-olds are more likely to be imitated by teens aged 15 to 17 than are the actions of those who are significantly older, so lowering the drinking age to 18 would also result in increased alcohol consumption by younger teens trying to emulate the actions of their older peers.

Mackenzie: The drinking age in America should be lowered to 18, because keeping it at 21 has not only failed to curb teen drinking but has encouraged those teens who do drink to do so in private, uncontrolled environments where they are more prone to life-endangering behavior. Many youths in European countries drink from an early age, and those countries have substantially fewer alcohol-related problems than we do in America.

Rachel’s argument is based on which of the following assumptions?


(A) Those who have reached the age of 21 are able to consume alcohol more responsibly than those who are 18.

(B) When European teenagers consume alcohol, they do so in public, controlled environments.

(C) Teens who are 15 to 17 years old are more impressionable than those who are aged 18 or older.

(D) The impressionability of one’s actions on others should not be a consideration when deciding the legal age to consume alcohol.

(E) Consuming alcohol in private, uncontrolled environments is not more dangerous than consuming alcohol in more public environments, such as bars or restaurants.


SIMILAR "WEAKEN "QUESTION IS HERE.


OFFICIAL EXPLANATION:



A. Rachel argues for retaining the current legal drinking age of 21. She bases her conclusion on the premises that younger drinkers are more likely to influence the behavior of 15- to 17-year-olds and that teens haven’t reached an age where they can drink alcohol responsibly.

To find the correct answer to questions that ask for an assumption, look for the answer choice that links one or more of the premises to the conclusion. Eliminate answer choices that don’t relate to at least one of the premises of the argument.

Choices (B) and (E) relate to one of Mackenzie’s premises, so it’s unlikely that they would reveal one of Rachel’s assumptions. Cross out those two answers on your noteboard.

You can also check off Choice (D) because it contradicts Rachel’s premise that the effect an 18-year-old’s alcohol consumption can have on younger peers is an important consideration in determining the legal drinking age. It’s also unlikely that Choice (C) is correct because Rachel doesn’t make comparisons regarding the impressionability of teens based on their ages. Her premise is that younger teens are more likely to be influenced by 18-year-olds than 21-year-olds. Furthermore, Choice (C) doesn’t link one of Rachel’s premises to her conclusion in the way that Choice (A) does.

If Rachel concludes that the legal drinking age must remain at 21 because younger drinkers don’t consume alcohol responsibly, she must think that 21-year-olds have achieved some level of responsibility that’s greater than those who are younger. Choice (A) links the relevance of one of Rachel’s premises (a lower level of responsible drinking) to her conclusion that people who are younger than 21 shouldn’t be able to legally consume alcohol. So the correct answer is Choice (A).
_________________
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 22 Sep 2018
Posts: 63
CAT Tests
Re: Rachel: The legal drinking age in America should remain at 21, because  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 16 Mar 2019, 22:17
I had chosen option E as my answer. I think I understand where I went wrong but please do help check my understanding.

E says alcohol drinking in private environment more dangerous than in public environment . However, the premise does not tell us the degree of level of danger consuming alcohol in private environment compared to in consuming alcohol in public environment. That is the reason why option E is wrong.
Manager
Manager
avatar
B
Joined: 04 Jun 2010
Posts: 73
Location: India
GMAT 1: 660 Q49 V31
GPA: 3.22
CAT Tests
Re: Rachel: The legal drinking age in America should remain at 21, because  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 11 May 2019, 01:00
rish2708 wrote:
redskull1 wrote:
I vote for C.

The answer is not A because drinking responsibly is already mentioned in the passage.

Posted from my mobile device



Exactly the responsibility factor is mentioned but if you notice carefully it is for 18 years :)

We are inherently assuming that 21 years is a responsible age.

And same is assumed by Rachel as well.

Apart from that the whole argument by both the debators hinges on the responsibility only as per me.



i feel too that option A is a restatement of the premise................. Option C is better among the rest
Intern
Intern
avatar
B
Joined: 14 Mar 2019
Posts: 3
Re: Rachel: The legal drinking age in America should remain at 21, because  [#permalink]

Show Tags

New post 19 May 2019, 07:59
I go for A because I eliminate other options as below

(A) Those who have reached the age of 21 are able to consume alcohol more responsibly than those who are 18.
--> This is actually the assumption that the argument is based on. Try to negate it, we will have "Those who have reached the age of 21 are NOT able to consume alcohol more responsibly than those who are 18". This statement will hurt the argument conclusion. So this is CORRECT.

(B) When European teenagers consume alcohol, they do so in public, controlled environments.
--> The first argument does not mention about European teenagers. So this is out of scope

(C) Teens who are 15 to 17 years old are more impressionable than those who are aged 18 or older.
--> We have nothing to do when comparing the impressionability. This is irrelevant.

(D) The impressionability of one’s actions on others should not be a consideration when deciding the legal age to consume alcohol.
--> Again irrelevant with impressionability.

(E) Consuming alcohol in private, uncontrolled environments is not more dangerous than consuming alcohol in more public environments, such as bars or restaurants.
--> Irrelevant to compare the danger of drinking in private place to public place.
GMAT Club Bot
Re: Rachel: The legal drinking age in America should remain at 21, because   [#permalink] 19 May 2019, 07:59
Display posts from previous: Sort by

Rachel: The legal drinking age in America should remain at 21, because

  new topic post reply Question banks Downloads My Bookmarks Reviews Important topics  





Powered by phpBB © phpBB Group | Emoji artwork provided by EmojiOne